This is topic The wall paintings of Ancient Egyptians in forum Egyptology at EgyptSearch Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=005661

Posted by Yonis2 (Member # 11348) on :
 
Most people have probably noticed now that American "whites" and "blacks" have been arguing and debating for some while now on the internet about the looks ("race") of the ancient egyptian. The American "black" camp usually argues that the ancient egyptians were "black", "negro" or whatever term is of choice due mostly to the skin colour of the reliefs and geographic location of Egypt and that arabs and southern european migration have diluted the egyptian "negrodeisity". And the American "white" camp claims to prove that they were nordic like by pointing out the straight nose or blue eyes (Ramses II red hair is very popular) and also some blond hair they might have detected on some wall relief, and that this "nordic desert empire" collapsed due to the entrance of "black" and arab blood.

I personally think both are wrong the Ancient Egyptians were and are still the same as upper egyptians you can find the ancient egyptian appearance still alive in most of rural egypt, and they are neither "black" or "white". the arabs, turks and other people who entered egypt from the levant were mostly confined to the delta region and settled in areas such as alexandria and cairo.

This Egyptian kid below has a striking resemblance to the king tut relief, he looks neither arab from levant or what is conventially considered "black" or "white".
 -  -

Pictures of pure Levantines (arabs)

 -

 -

Egyptians are quite distinct from these people, which they also showed on the wall paintings.

Egyptians
 -

 -

 -

 -
 
Posted by Yonis2 (Member # 11348) on :
 
Now in contrast to "Asiatics" again

 -

 -

As you can see Egyptians look nothing like "arabs" or "asiatics", they have quite a unique and distinct phenotype that is indigenous.

Thats why i say it's not necessery to talk about invading arabs, europeans or blacks so to reconstruct how they really looked like, it's righ there, if you want to see how the ancients of that nation looked like then just make a trip to the rural side of Egypt. They were neither "black" or "white" they were and are simply Egyptian.
 
Posted by Doug M (Member # 7650) on :
 
Yonis2 your picture spamming is irrelevant. Many parts of the modern Egyptian population is heavily mixed with European, Arab and Levantine blood. Pictures don't tell you this, genetics does. Likewise parts of the Egyptian population are quite black in all senses of the term. Modern Egypt is a blend of African, European and Levantine types as a result of Egypt being a historical crossroads of cultures and civilizations for the last 3,000 years or more. The aboriginal indigenous population of the Nile Valley has always been black African, even if many modern Egyptians are not black. The ancient population of Egypt was not populated by the exact same set of phenotypes that are seen today, even if modern Egyptians are descended from ancient Egypt. The fact that many modern Egyptians are not black does not change the fact that there are blacks in Egypt with features no different from other black Africans across the Nile Valley and Sahara. They are not some unique and special class of people just because they happen to be within the borders of Egypt.
 
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
 
^ Doug is correct. Most modern day Egyptians are very mixed and vary from province to province and from city to city. Even within the same city especially big ones like Cairo there is abundant diversity in looks.

However, there are certain sections of the population that have preserved the looks of their ancient ancestors. Most of these people are located in the very rural areas of Upper Egypt like these folks below:

 -

 -

 -

 -

 -  -
 
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
 
Better pic of Tut's throne portrait
 -

A close up of Tut
 -

Ramses II (the Great)
 -

Thutmose III
 -

Other wall paintings:

 -

 -

 -
 
Posted by rasol (Member # 4592) on :
 
quote:
Most people have probably noticed now that American "whites" and "blacks" have been arguing and debating for some while now
I see you still haven't learned to shake off that passive voice Yonis.

No need to hide your powerful anti-black emotions behind Americans.

Learn to speak directly, otherwise you sound like a man who doesn't believe himself.

It's about what *you are arguing* - not what some say, others say, some feel, many believe, and the weakly emoted semantics which keep you down.

The Kemetians were Black, by self-definition and that is *exactly* what I consider them. Black was sacred to the Km.t, and I respect them for being proud and not ashamed of their own skins.

Your problems with Km.t being Black are due to the psychological 'beat down' put on you by Arab and Ws.t alike, and I honestly pity you in this regard.
 
Posted by osiriun (Member # 14297) on :
 
Again, if Black Americans no longer wish to be called Black why should an Egyptian of mixed ancestry?
 
Posted by Sundiata (Member # 13096) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:
Again, if Black Americans no longer wish to be called Black why should an Egyptian of mixed ancestry?

Where'd you get that idea from? I'm African American and I refer to myself and all those with whom I identify, as black. Nearly all of those in my community do the same and I've yet to come across an African American who didn't see him/herself in this light. What Arabized Egyptians in 2007 consider themselves is completely irrelevant..
 
Posted by osiriun (Member # 14297) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:
Again, if Black Americans no longer wish to be called Black why should an Egyptian of mixed ancestry?

Where'd you get that idea from? I'm African American and I refer to myself and all those with whom I identify, as black. Nearly all of those in my community do the same and I've yet to come across an African American who didn't see him/herself in this light. What Arabized Egyptians in 2007 consider themselves is completely irrelevant..
I sure feel uncomfortable calling anyone Black anymore. I generally do call Black people African American. I always feel like I slipped up if I say Black.
 
Posted by Sundiata (Member # 13096) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:
Again, if Black Americans no longer wish to be called Black why should an Egyptian of mixed ancestry?

Where'd you get that idea from? I'm African American and I refer to myself and all those with whom I identify, as black. Nearly all of those in my community do the same and I've yet to come across an African American who didn't see him/herself in this light. What Arabized Egyptians in 2007 consider themselves is completely irrelevant..
I sure feel uncomfortable calling anyone Black anymore.
Sounds like a personal problem, but it surely has nothing to do with us African Americans who are proud of what we are........Black.
 
Posted by osiriun (Member # 14297) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:
Again, if Black Americans no longer wish to be called Black why should an Egyptian of mixed ancestry?

Where'd you get that idea from? I'm African American and I refer to myself and all those with whom I identify, as black. Nearly all of those in my community do the same and I've yet to come across an African American who didn't see him/herself in this light. What Arabized Egyptians in 2007 consider themselves is completely irrelevant..
I know some that consider themselves Black or are not opposed to the generalization. Many Somalians do not like to be referred to as Black Africans but are not opposed to the Black American label. Of course most Upper Egyptians that are Fellahin are more tribal oriented. Many African Americans to move to these parts of Egypt and fit right in, however, a person from Nigeria would like stick out (lots of Ethiopians would not).

Nice message board irregardless of the obsession with labeling. I suppose there was a time when even Nubians weren't considered Black (boy that really stretching it). I think Black is fine. After some consideration, if Europeans can claim Greece as a completely White society then Egypt should be referred to as Black. I don't know where that leaves Eurasians though. Seems like we don't get credit for anything anymore.
 
Posted by Sundiata (Member # 13096) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:
I think Black is fine. After some consideration, if Europeans can claim Greece as a completely White society then Egypt should be referred to as Black. I don't know where that leaves Eurasians though. Seems like we don't get credit for anything anymore.

Okay, now you're on the right track and are finally starting to make sense. Maybe I was a bit hard on you in the other thread as you truly are trying to understand the social ramifications of labels and how it should and can apply to civilization, though your bias is still apparent by your reference to Eurasia in the context of "seeking credit". As pointed out, it is my contention that it is a double standard to dichotomize Africa, but not Europe. Until that is addressed, I am firm in my classification of Egypt as a Black civilization, the same as how East Flatbush (Brooklyn) is a black neighborhood. As far as "Eurasians", if you mean SW Asians ("middle east"), then why not try focusing on SW Asia if it is "credit" you are actually seeking? That way you won't have to force a relationship between Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia to find what you are looking for.
 
Posted by rasol (Member # 4592) on :
 
quote:
if Europeans can claim Greece as a completely White society
Britain isn't completely white either. Nor is it completely European. You cannot use the word -completely- selectively to qualify Black African identity, but not qualify other identities.

There is no completely European society, there is no completely Jewish society, or culture or even language.

Kemet was Black African socieity on its own terms and was recognised as such throughout history.

It is the ws.t that polluted the discourse via racism, by deciding that in order to justify imperialism...Blacks would erradicated from history in any context other than slave.

It is this ws.t revisionist history that still has Yonis2 entrapped.
 
Posted by rasol (Member # 4592) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:
Again, if Black Americans no longer wish to be called Black why should an Egyptian of mixed ancestry?

I have no idea. I also have no idea of how your question is relevant to the topic of *Ancient* Egyptians?
 
Posted by sportbilly (Member # 14122) on :
 
I got into it the other night with some white supremecist who was referencing something called the Stela of Philae.

He says that Sesostris the Third, was a Nordic (crazy, but the pic of the statue he showed, which I later found to only be one of many!) and declared no blacks were to be allowed north of that point.
Here's the pic he held up as unassailable proof.
 -

Now of course like all white supremecist whackos who claim the Egyptians were Nordics, all he has is the one "piece of evidence." An accurate term, since it's only a fragment of a larger whole. Like the scumbags who claims Ramses "red hair" was proof positive he was "Nordic." Of course when you ask if Ramses father or children had red hair, or even brown hair for that matter, they mumble something about traits not being passed on and quickly change the subject.
i'm still waiting for one Euro-supremecist to explain to me where the Egyptians depicted themselves as blonde or red-headed.
BTW, pseaking of Sesostris III Here's two other depictions I found of the same guy:

 -
 -

And his grandfather:
 -


I read Anta Diop's book, and all he pretty much says on that point is that the Stela was misinterpretted, and that Eurocentric's chose to interpret "Nahasi" as "Black," in order to try to undergird the assertion the Egyptians were whites and hated blacks.
I would like some mroe information on that. Searchd the archives, but didn't find anything on it. Anyone know anything about what Diop was talking about?
 
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by sportbilly:

I got into it the other night with some white supremecist who was referencing something called the Stela of Philae.

He says that Sesostris the Third, was a Nordic (crazy, but the pic of the statue he showed, which I later found to only be one of many!) and declared no blacks were to be allowed north of that point.

^ LOL Typical white racist propaganda. During the 12th dynasty, Egypt was having trouble with certain 'Nubian' groups whose raids into Egyptian territories became so bad that Senwosoret III built forts along the southern border and made a decree that "No Nhsi shall pass except to do trade". Of course it was the racist custom first started by Egyptologist James Henry Breasted, to translate Nhsi into "negro"! A custom still followed today.

Of course it doesn't matter to these idiots that the closest word to "negro" in Egyptian is Kem which the Egyptians called themselves!

Nor does it matter that his predecessor from the 11th dynasty, was married to a couple of Nubian wives:

 -
 
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Yonis2:

...Pictures of pure Levantines (arabs)

 -

 -

...

But as we all know Arabs are not pure and never have been. And those two pictures of the men above seem to be proof of that with their ambiguous features.
 
Posted by Sundiata (Member # 13096) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by sportbilly:
I got into it the other night with some white supremecist who was referencing something called the Stela of Philae.

He says that Sesostris the Third, was a Nordic (crazy, but the pic of the statue he showed, which I later found to only be one of many!) and declared no blacks were to be allowed north of that point.
Here's the pic he held up as unassailable proof.
 -

Now of course like all white supremecist whackos who claim the Egyptians were Nordics, all he has is the one "piece of evidence." An accurate term, since it's only a fragment of a larger whole. Like the scumbags who claims Ramses "red hair" was proof positive he was "Nordic." Of course when you ask if Ramses father or children had red hair, or even brown hair for that matter, they mumble something about traits not being passed on and quickly change the subject.
i'm still waiting for one Euro-supremecist to explain to me where the Egyptians depicted themselves as blonde or red-headed.
BTW, pseaking of Sesostris III Here's two other depictions I found of the same guy:

 -
 -

And his grandfather:
 -


I read Anta Diop's book, and all he pretty much says on that point is that the Stela was misinterpretted, and that Eurocentric's chose to interpret "Nahasi" as "Black," in order to try to undergird the assertion the Egyptians were whites and hated blacks.
I would like some mroe information on that. Searchd the archives, but didn't find anything on it. Anyone know anything about what Diop was talking about?

Ironic to say the least. In addition to what Djehuti explains, I'd also like to point out that despite his shortcomings, Frank Yurco was extremely helpful in dispelling this nonsense in particular. It is appropriate then, that I quote him in full, concerning this supposed issue.

When members of the royal family were descended from such foreign populations or from border areas, pharaonic sculpture and reliefs clearly display their ethnic features. For example, the XIIth Dynasty (1991-1786 B.C.E.) originated from the Aswan region.4 As expected, strong Nubian features and dark coloring are seen in their sculpture and relief work. This dynasty ranks as among the greatest, whose fame far outlived its actual tenure on the throne. Especially interesting, it was a member of this dynasty- that decreed that no Nehsy (riverine Nubian of the principality of Kush), except such as came for trade or diplomatic reasons, should pass by the Egyptian fortress at the southern end of the Second Nile Cataract. Why would this royal family of Nubian ancestry ban other Nubians from coming into Egyptian territory? Because the Egyptian rulers of Nubian ancestry had become Egyptians culturally; as pharaohs, they exhibited typical Egyptian attitudes and adopted typical Egyptian policies. - Source

Also see: The Prophecies of Neferti

^I still have some problems with his approach to that, namely the reference to "Nubian features/ancestry", as opposed to Egyptian, but this is actually more than enough to poke major holes in that crappy argument, since even according to Yurco, these people were "blacks" (southerners) themselves.


Such jumble also reminds me of the naivete of Vermeule. As a supposed rebuttal to black Athena, she basically implied that the tensions between Egypt and Kush were racially motivated. However, she doesn't mention conquests with the same ferocity in Syrio-Palestine as the Egyptians began to expand their empire, not to mention that the conflict was deeply political and actually was in major part, a retaliation for a Kushite and Hyksos alliance during the New Kingdom's formative period (which is why directly proceeding, they expanded both south AND north), or actually just prior, as is evidenced by this article, here.

Keita addresses the issue as well, stating:

Excusing the pejorative “tribal warfare” (in Europe it is called ethnic conflict), it is clear that she is saying that this must have been a racial war . . . However, the antagonisms between Kush and Egypt were political and not racial - See, Kamugisha, Aaron. Finally in africa? Egypt, from Diop to Celenko. “Race & Class” 45 (2003): 31-60
 
Posted by osiriun (Member # 14297) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Djehuti:
quote:
Originally posted by sportbilly:

I got into it the other night with some white supremecist who was referencing something called the Stela of Philae.

He says that Sesostris the Third, was a Nordic (crazy, but the pic of the statue he showed, which I later found to only be one of many!) and declared no blacks were to be allowed north of that point.

^ LOL Typical white racist propaganda. During the 12th dynasty, Egypt was having trouble with certain 'Nubian' groups whose raids into Egyptian territories became so bad that Senwosoret III built forts along the southern border and made a decree that "No Nhsi shall pass except to do trade". Of course it was the racist custom first started by Egyptologist James Henry Breasted, to translate Nhsi into "negro"! A custom still followed today.

Of course it doesn't matter to these idiots that the closest word to "negro" in Egyptian is Kem which the Egyptians called themselves!

Nor does it matter that his predecessor from the 11th dynasty, was married to a couple of Nubian wives:

 -

Nice - you do this well.
 
Posted by alTakruri (Member # 10195) on :
 
OT COMMENTS

There are many terms we use here in our specialized
sense which the world in general uses quite differently.

Eurasia is one such term.

Due to our heavy concentration with population genetics,
Eurasia is what geography makes of it, i.e. the entire
landmass of the Asia "kite" and its Europe "tail" with
its indigenous peoples.

To the world however Eurasia brings to mind things composed
of European and Asian ingredients or places where Europe
and Asia border each other.


Thus at one time Austrian tailored cashmere coats
were Eurasian, Turkey was Eurasian, war babies in
Viet Nam were Eurasians, etc.

On the otherhand, the area refered to below as SW
Asia/Middle East has always been Afro-Asia never
Eurasia in any sense i.e., Afro-Asian, Afro-Asiatic.

quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:
... I don't know where that leaves Eurasians though. Seems like we don't get credit for anything anymore.

... As far as "Eurasians", if you mean SW Asians ("middle east"), ...

 
Posted by alTakruri (Member # 10195) on :
 
Got to look for the correct name in the archive.

I don't help folk counter white supremacists
but I do have something written up on this
pharaoh that you can read here.

quote:
Originally posted by sportbilly:
...the Stela of Philae.

He says that Sesostris the Third, was a Nordic ... and
declared no blacks were to be allowed north of that point.

I read Anta Diop's book, and all he pretty much says on
that point is that the Stela was misinterpretted, and that
Eurocentric's chose to interpret "Nahasi" as "Black," in order
to try to undergird the assertion the Egyptians were whites
and hated blacks.

I would like some mroe information on that. Searchd
the archives, but didn't find anything on it. Anyone
know anything about what Diop was talking about?


 
Posted by osiriun (Member # 14297) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by rasol:
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:
Again, if Black Americans no longer wish to be called Black why should an Egyptian of mixed ancestry?

I have no idea. I also have no idea of how your question is relevant to the topic of *Ancient* Egyptians?
In otherwards, don't be so hard on people that have Black ancestry but do not label themselves as Black. My Grandfather was half Black (Great Grandmother was Ethiopian) but I do not see myself as Black but primarily because it is not my cultural heritage nor am I identifiably Black. Middle Eastern is the handle.
 
Posted by Sundiata (Member # 13096) on :
 
^^And the relevance of this to Ancient Egypt?
 
Posted by osiriun (Member # 14297) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
^^And the relevance of this to Ancient Egypt?

Dynastic Egypt was around for a long time. What do you consider ancient?
 
Posted by osiriun (Member # 14297) on :
 
So that is a question for this board. Did Egypt stop being Egypt when the Hysoks conqured it. How about when the Nubians. Assyrian? Persians? Who did not conquer Egypt anyways. Copper and Bronze didn't work well against Iron, right?
 
Posted by rasol (Member # 4592) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
Sounds like a personal problem, but it surely has nothing to do with us African Americans who are proud of what we are........Black.

As were the AE. Osirus is called The Great Black. How ironic.
 
Posted by blackman (Member # 1807) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
Sounds like a personal problem, but it surely has nothing to do with us African Americans who are proud of what we are........Black.

Well said and I second that. Only a weak minded black person would be ashamed of being called black.
 
Posted by sportbilly (Member # 14122) on :
 
Okay, BIG thanks to Djehuti, Smooth Al Takuri and the silent but deadly Sundiata for the info on Senwosoret III.

Another two questions though:

1.) I'd read that the Egyptians, in the Papyrus of Henefu, said they came from the Mountains of the Moon, which was supposed to be at the origin of the White Nile, which is in Uganda.
But then the Ethiopians said (at least according to Herodotus) Egypt was a colony of Ethiopian expatriates.
Anyone got any opinions on whether the Egyptians were Ugandan in origin or Ethiopian, or was Uganda perhaps part of Ethiopia at one point?

2.) I'd also read on another forum that Hatshepsut was a Nubian, and a lesbian. I'm not at all interested in her sexuality (okay, maybe just a little...) but I would like some of you guys input about Hatshepsut's Nubian roots and for that matter more on the Egyptian's repeated marrying of Nubian brides.
 
Posted by Mystery Solver (Member # 9033) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:

Many African Americans to move to these parts of Egypt and fit right in, however, a person from Nigeria would like stick out (lots of Ethiopians would not).

So far, I haven't come across a country where any foreigner isn't likely to stick out. For instance, a Nigerian will likely stick out in Cameroon, and the case would be vice versa.


quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:

After some consideration, if Europeans can claim Greece as a completely White society then Egypt should be referred to as Black. I don't know where that leaves Eurasians though. Seems like we don't get credit for anything anymore.

It was a matter of time - finally out of the closet so to speak; you came out here talking about trying to approach things unbiased. So you do have an agenda, looking to find credit for what you consider "your people" in the Nile Valley, bypassing the rich history in the so-called Mesopotamia.

Osiriun, don't you find it odd that you feel, that just because people are rightfully characterizing ancient Nile Valley complexes as "African" and "by African", all of a sudden you - "Eurasians" - cease to get credit for "anything anymore"? LOL.

So, you have nothing to look towards to, but ancient complex in Africa, to feel that you've accomplished something? The real question should be, if Africans can't take credit for their own accomplishments, just so they can make "Eurasians" feel happy to get credit for *something*, where does that leave Africans? LOL.
 
Posted by rasol (Member # 4592) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:
Middle Eastern is the handle.

Middle Eastern is a term invented by the British in the early 20 century to protect their oil interrest. It has no meaning outside of that context, and is nonexistent as a historical reference.
 
Posted by osiriun (Member # 14297) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by rasol:
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:
Middle Eastern is the handle.

Middle Eastern is a term invented by the British in the early 20 century to protect their oil interrest. It has no meaning outside of that context, and is nonexistent as a historical reference.
It is what I am called today.
 
Posted by osiriun (Member # 14297) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mystery Solver:
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:

Many African Americans to move to these parts of Egypt and fit right in, however, a person from Nigeria would like stick out (lots of Ethiopians would not).

So far, I haven't come across a country where any foreigner isn't likely to stick out. For instance, a Nigerian will likely stick out in Cameroon, and the case would be vice versa.


quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:

After some consideration, if Europeans can claim Greece as a completely White society then Egypt should be referred to as Black. I don't know where that leaves Eurasians though. Seems like we don't get credit for anything anymore.

It was a matter of time - finally out of the closet so to speak; you came out here talking about trying to approach things unbiased. So you do have an agenda, looking to find credit for what you consider "your people" in the Nile Valley, bypassing the rich history in the so-called Mesopotamia.

Osiriun, don't you find it odd that you feel, that just because people are rightfully characterizing ancient Nile Valley complexes as "African" and "by African", all of a sudden you - "Eurasians" - cease to get credit for "anything anymore"? LOL.

So, you have nothing to look towards to, but ancient complex in Africa, to feel that you've accomplished something? The real question should be, if Africans can't take credit for their own accomplishments, just so they can make "Eurasians" feel happy to get credit for *something*, where does that leave Africans? LOL.

Rubbish. Of COURSE Egypt was African. Where's the Mesopatamian script/language/tools in Egypt? Where's the cultural and religious influence? Mesopatamia and Egypt are worlds apart. You had your oppourtunity to point that out but you are a weak poster.

Were Eurasians in Egypt since pre-Dynastic times? Sure they were but they were probably more like many Hispanic people in American society - semi-skilled laborers or migrant workers of some sort. Why couldn't you point that out.

Why do many of you resort to emotional rantings and personal attacks rather than stick to scientific principals?
 
Posted by rasol (Member # 4592) on :
 
quote:
Osiriun, don't you find it odd that you feel, that just because people are rightfully characterizing ancient Nile Valley complexes as "African" and "by African", all of a sudden you - "Eurasians" - cease to get credit for "anything anymore
There was never civilisation called Mesopotamia. Meso-potamia is a Greek word for and area between rivers. It has the same linguistic structure as Hippo-potamus, where Hippo is greek for horse and Meso is greek for middle and potam is river.

The people involved in ancient Levantine civilisaions like Akadia were Asiatics.

These people are known to the Kemetians as Aamu.

No scholar credits Kemetic civilisation to Asiatic Aamu. Certainly the Kemetians never did, since they largely villified Asiatics as intruders.

And Asiatics did succeed finally - in destroying dynastic Kemet and replacing it with and alien culture which arrogantly postures on African soil to this day. [Frown]

Here is your *mesopotamian* influence discribed by the KM.t 1st hand:

Pharoah will build the Walls-of-the-Ruler to bar [Asiatics] from entering [Egypt];

They shall beg water as supplicants so as to let their cattle drink.
- Prophesy Neferti.
 
Posted by Charlie Bass (Member # 10328) on :
 
I wonder why the aimed comments at American whites and blacks, the majority of whom don't waste their time talking about the race of the ancient Egyptians. Can people leave their veiled personal attacks out of this?
 
Posted by osiriun (Member # 14297) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by rasol:
quote:
Osiriun, don't you find it odd that you feel, that just because people are rightfully characterizing ancient Nile Valley complexes as "African" and "by African", all of a sudden you - "Eurasians" - cease to get credit for "anything anymore
There was never civilisation called Mesopotamia. Meso-potamia is a Greek word for and area between rivers. It has the same linguistic structure as Hippo-potamus, where Hippo is greek for horse and Meso is greek for middle and potam is river.

The people involved in ancient Levantine civilisaions like Akadia were Asiatics.

These people are known to the Kemetians as Aamu.

No scholar credits Kemetic civilisation to Asiatic Aamu. Certainly the Kemetians never did, since they largely villified Asiatics as intruders.

And Asiatics did succeed finally - in destroying dynastic Kemet and replacing it with and alien culture which arrogantly postures on African soil to this day. [Frown]

Here is your *mesopotamian* influence discribed by the KM.t 1st hand:

Pharoah will build the Walls-of-the-Ruler to bar [Asiatics] from entering [Egypt];

They shall beg water as supplicants so as to let their cattle drink.
- Prophesy Neferti.

The Hysoks brought peace and prosperity to Egypt!
 
Posted by Sundiata (Member # 13096) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:
quote:
Originally posted by rasol:
quote:
Osiriun, don't you find it odd that you feel, that just because people are rightfully characterizing ancient Nile Valley complexes as "African" and "by African", all of a sudden you - "Eurasians" - cease to get credit for "anything anymore
There was never civilisation called Mesopotamia. Meso-potamia is a Greek word for and area between rivers. It has the same linguistic structure as Hippo-potamus, where Hippo is greek for horse and Meso is greek for middle and potam is river.

The people involved in ancient Levantine civilisaions like Akadia were Asiatics.

These people are known to the Kemetians as Aamu.

No scholar credits Kemetic civilisation to Asiatic Aamu. Certainly the Kemetians never did, since they largely villified Asiatics as intruders.

And Asiatics did succeed finally - in destroying dynastic Kemet and replacing it with and alien culture which arrogantly postures on African soil to this day. [Frown]

Here is your *mesopotamian* influence discribed by the KM.t 1st hand:

Pharoah will build the Walls-of-the-Ruler to bar [Asiatics] from entering [Egypt];

They shall beg water as supplicants so as to let their cattle drink.
- Prophesy Neferti.

The Hysoks brought peace and prosperity to Egypt!
[Confused] Are you sure about that?

Manetho (Ancient Egyptian priest) on the Hyksos:

In his reign, for what cause I know not, a blast of God smote us; and unexpectedly, from the regions of the East, invaders of obscure race marched in confidence of victory against our land. By main force they easily overpowered the rulers of the land, they then burned our cities ruthlessly, razed to the ground the temples of the gods, and treated all the natives with a cruel hostility, massacring some and leading into slavery the wives and children of others. Finally, they appointed as king one of their number whose name was Salitis. He had his seat at Memphis, levying tribute from Upper and Lower Egypt, and leaving garrisons behind in the most advantageous positions. Above all, he fortified the district to the east, foreseeing that the Assyrians, as they grew stronger, would one day covet and attack his kingdom. - Manetho, Aegyptiaca., frag. 42, 1.75-79.2
 
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
 
^ So much for "peace and prosperity". [Embarrassed]
 
Posted by osiriun (Member # 14297) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:
quote:
Originally posted by rasol:
quote:
Osiriun, don't you find it odd that you feel, that just because people are rightfully characterizing ancient Nile Valley complexes as "African" and "by African", all of a sudden you - "Eurasians" - cease to get credit for "anything anymore
There was never civilisation called Mesopotamia. Meso-potamia is a Greek word for and area between rivers. It has the same linguistic structure as Hippo-potamus, where Hippo is greek for horse and Meso is greek for middle and potam is river.

The people involved in ancient Levantine civilisaions like Akadia were Asiatics.

These people are known to the Kemetians as Aamu.

No scholar credits Kemetic civilisation to Asiatic Aamu. Certainly the Kemetians never did, since they largely villified Asiatics as intruders.

And Asiatics did succeed finally - in destroying dynastic Kemet and replacing it with and alien culture which arrogantly postures on African soil to this day. [Frown]

Here is your *mesopotamian* influence discribed by the KM.t 1st hand:

Pharoah will build the Walls-of-the-Ruler to bar [Asiatics] from entering [Egypt];

They shall beg water as supplicants so as to let their cattle drink.
- Prophesy Neferti.

The Hysoks brought peace and prosperity to Egypt!
[Confused] Are you sure about that?

Manetho (Ancient Egyptian priest) on the Hyksos:

In his reign, for what cause I know not, a blast of God smote us; and unexpectedly, from the regions of the East, invaders of obscure race marched in confidence of victory against our land. By main force they easily overpowered the rulers of the land, they then burned our cities ruthlessly, razed to the ground the temples of the gods, and treated all the natives with a cruel hostility, massacring some and leading into slavery the wives and children of others. Finally, they appointed as king one of their number whose name was Salitis. He had his seat at Memphis, levying tribute from Upper and Lower Egypt, and leaving garrisons behind in the most advantageous positions. Above all, he fortified the district to the east, foreseeing that the Assyrians, as they grew stronger, would one day covet and attack his kingdom. - Manetho, Aegyptiaca., frag. 42, 1.75-79.2

They were seen as invaders regardless of the properity they brought!
 
Posted by osiriun (Member # 14297) on :
 
Somewhat like the Us in Iraq.
 
Posted by Mystery Solver (Member # 9033) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:

Rubbish. Of COURSE Egypt was African.

If you feel that the most logical followup to your post is rubbish, then you might want to drop this rubbish:

After some consideration, if Europeans can claim Greece as a completely White society then Egypt should be referred to as Black. I don't know where that leaves Eurasians though. Seems like we don't get credit for anything anymore. - Osiriun

...so that a question addressing the rubbish, doesn't sound rubbish as well.


quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:

Where's the Mesopatamian script/language/tools in Egypt? Where's the cultural and religious influence? Mesopatamia and Egypt are worlds apart. You had your oppourtunity to point that out but you are a weak poster.

Were Eurasians in Egypt since pre-Dynastic times? Sure they were but they were probably more like many Hispanic people in American society - semi-skilled laborers or migrant workers of some sort. Why couldn't you point that out.

Of what relevance are these trivial points to characterizing Egypt as being African, which is what you were whining about? If some one says that some "Asiatic" servants were here and there in Kemet, how does that affect anything about rightfully characterizing it 'African'?


quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:

Why do many of you resort to emotional rantings and personal attacks rather than stick to scientific principals?

Where? Citation.
 
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:

They were seen as invaders regardless of the prosperity they brought!

[Eek!] Didn't you read that description by Manetho? How do you call all that destruction and subjugation "prosperity"?!

quote:
Somewhat like the Us in Iraq.
And since when did the U.S. burn down Mosques, kill men, and enslave women and children?! Seriously, Osiriun what are you thinking?? [Confused]
quote:
Originally posted by Mystery Solver:

If you feel that the most logical followup to your post is rubbish, then you might want to drop this rubbish:

After some consideration, if Europeans can claim Greece as a completely White society then Egypt should be referred to as Black. I don't know where that leaves Eurasians though. [b]Seems like we don't get credit for anything anymore.

and...

Were Eurasians in Egypt since pre-Dynastic times? Sure they were but they were probably more like many Hispanic people in American society - semi-skilled laborers or migrant workers of some sort. Why couldn't you point that out. - Osiriun

Ah! I see now. You feel somewhat misled that there is no "Eurasian" credit in Egyptian civilization and you seem to be desperate for that. As I recall you expressed this notion last time you were here, alot this having to do with your Jewish 'heritage' and wanting to impart Kemet as part of that heritage.

First of all, let it be known that even though the Hyksos were Asiatics, they were NOT the Hebrew ancestors you claim.

Second, if you are so proud of your Jewish/Hebrew ancestry why try to (in vain) make Egypt a part of this heritage when it obviously is not. Yes Jewish/Hebrew history is intimately linked with Egypt but do not try to make the mistake of Eurocentrics in denying the obvious African identity and credit that Egypt was.
 
Posted by osiriun (Member # 14297) on :
 
Rubbish. Look at the death toll in Iraq. Look at what is left of the infrastructure. The benefits to the Iraqi people may finally come but the Americans will be remembered for the atrocities (rape and murder of innocent civilians) and the abuse (Abdu Girabi) and the intent of plundering (Oir reserves).

As for the connection between Egypt and Mesopatamia. Are you sure there is no connection or is that like your answer to the question about classical writers and descriptions of Egyptians?
 
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:

Rubbish. Look at the death toll in Iraq. Look at what is left of the infrastructure. The benefits to the Iraqi people may finally come but the Americans will be remembered for the atrocities (rape and murder of innocent civilians) and the abuse (Abdu Girabi) and the intent of plundering (Oir reserves).

I haven't heard any news of U.S. soldiers raping Iraqi women though I do not dismiss the possibility. As for murder, I don't even take all those stories of U.S troops committing "massacre" with a grain of salt as rightly, the only ones committing true massacres are Iraqi terorrists who resort to suicide bombings.

[Embarrassed] Either way, again when has the U.S. actually razed to the ground Iraqi mosques or enslave people the same way the Hyksos did? They didn't so please do not involve modern politics into this ancient event. There is a board for that here.

quote:
As for the connection between Egypt and Mesopatamia. Are you sure there is no connection or is that like your answer to the question about classical writers and descriptions of Egyptians?
LOL If you recall that particular writer you cited isn't from the Classical Greek period but from the Roman period. And well, Sundiata pretty much answered your reply.

As for Mesopotamian 'connection'. Other than economic ties via trade, what other connection do you suppose? Any evidence of such?
 
Posted by Willing Thinker {What Box} (Member # 10819) on :
 
Me 3!

quote:
Originally posted by blackman:
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
Sounds like a personal problem, but it surely has nothing to do with us African Americans who are proud of what we are........Black.

Well said and I second that. Only a weak minded black person would be ashamed of being called black.
Me 3!

Well, not only the weak minded, but pretty much so. A misled person might dis-like the word aswell.

quote:
Originally posted by Charlie Bass:
I wonder why the aimed comments at American whites and blacks, the majority of whom don't waste their time talking about the race of the ancient Egyptians. Can people leave their veiled personal attacks out of this?

The world may never know...
 
Posted by Mystery Solver (Member # 9033) on :
 
Actually, Egyptomania romancing and the attempt to ethno-identify with ancient Egypt, is a reality in Europe and the U.S. Africans at large don't talk about it much, until if and when they come to these regions and come across any questioning of its 'Africanity'. If in doubt, also ask: Who make up most of the tourists that come to see the ancient Nile Valley relics? Who makes movies about Ancient Egyptians being played by white actors?
 
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
 
^ Indeed. Some whites complain about Afrocentrism when it comes to the study of Egypt but look at how Egypt (an African culture) is presented by the Western media/!

Oh and another good question to add to Mystery's list: Who among Western tourists are mistaken for being native Egyptians?! [Wink]
 
Posted by prmiddleeastern (Member # 14038) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Djehuti:
 -

 -

 -

 -

 -  -

Y haplogroup F individuals.
 
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
 
^ And you base this on.. the way they look?! [Confused]

LOL Uh oh guys, looks like we have another 'one'. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by prmiddleeastern (Member # 14038) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Djehuti:
^ And you base this on.. the way they look?! [Confused]

LOL Uh oh guys, looks like we have another 'one'. [Big Grin]

yes, because the are neither white or black,Bcak african male haplogroup are A, B, an E, and white ones are G,I,J,K and R.
 
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
 
^ You make no sense. First of all, those are obviously all photos of black men. And second you cannot correlate haplogroups to skin color or phenotype. For example, R is also carried by West African Cameroonians while E is also found in Greeks.

Looks like you are just another person who knows not what he says. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by sportbilly (Member # 14122) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Djehuti:
^ Indeed. Some whites complain about Afrocentrism when it comes to the study of Egypt

Considering that Egypt is IN Africa, and was one of the cornerstones of African civilization, what could be more appropriate that it being studied under the banner of Afrocentrism?

And what could be more stupid than to claim the Egyptians were not "African," --that they only lived there and came from there, but weren't OF Africa-- and were not black either.

There were no "brown whites," (what the hell is a "brown" white anyway?) or indigenous caucasians who laid the foundations of Africa and there was no neutral third race out there either. Amazing what ridiculous ends folks are willing to go to in order to sustain (if only in their own sick minds) the myth of black inferiority. As if blacks NEED Egypt to hold up, when Meroe, Mali, Ghana and Ethiopia also stand testament to what blacks accomplished.
If blacks aren't out trying to prove that Rome and europe were inherently african/black then the knee-jerk histrionics that predictably ensue when blacks claim their historical underpinnings must stop.
 
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
 
^ Well apparently you haven't heard of the "Hamitic caucasoid race" theory where populations like Egyptians to Ethiopians and Somalians were acknowledged as dark-brown and even black but actually "caucasian". LOL [Big Grin]
 
Posted by sportbilly (Member # 14122) on :
 
^I get the joke. But I would add, I've heard theories for damned near everything, but I'm usually swayed by proof. And mythical "brown whites" is as stupid as it sounds.

Hell, Ive seen theories that the pyramids were built at the directions of aliens from space. Doesn't make it true.
 
Posted by prmiddleeastern (Member # 14038) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Djehuti:
^ You make no sense. First of all, those are obviously all photos of black men. And second you cannot correlate haplogroups to skin color or phenotype. For example, R is also carried by West African Cameroonians while E is also found in Greeks.

Looks like you are just another person who knows not what he says. [Roll Eyes]

So, egyptians are black truly and not an unique ethnicity as others say?
 
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
 
^ 'Black' is a reference to skin-color NOT ethnicity. There are black peoples from Africa through the tropics of Asia all the way to the Pacific! Also what is so 'unique' about their ethnicity. They were an African group speaking an Afrasian language closely related to other African groups like the Beja and practiced a culture very similar to many other Africans, including West Africans!

And?...
 
Posted by prmiddleeastern (Member # 14038) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Djehuti:
^ 'Black' is a reference to skin-color NOT ethnicity. There are black peoples from Africa through the tropics of Asia all the way to the Pacific! Also what is so 'unique' about their ethnicity. They were an African group speaking an Afrasian language closely related to other African groups like the Beja and practiced a culture very similar to many other Africans, including West Africans!

And?...

yes, melanesians and the "negrito" are also black, I agree with you on that part.
 
Posted by Sundiata (Member # 13096) on :
 
^But they are not Africans, so your point is moot basically.. This of course goes back to your silly implication of "black" being an ethnic appellation. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by KemsonReloaded (Member # 14127) on :
 
There is no such thing as "Afrasian" or "Afriasian". It never existed! It's a strawman term.
 
Posted by Sundiata (Member # 13096) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by KemsonReloaded:
There is not such thing as "Afrasian" or "Afriasian". It never existed!

It simply applies to the classification of a particular African language phylum that emerged in east Africa over 10,000 years ago, which should very well be labeled "African", but isn't. Therefore, for sake of standard nomenclature, it actually does exist and designates this said language phylum that is found spoken through out Africa and SW Asia, but predominantly in Africa, where it emerged:

From Egypt in Africa, 1996, pp. 25-27

The origins of Egyptian ethnicity lay in the areas south of Egypt. The ancient Egyptian language belonged to the Afrasian family (also called Afroasiatic or, formerly, Hamito-Semitic). The speakers of the earliest Afrasian languages, according to recent studies, were a set of peoples whose lands between 15,000 and 13,000 B.C. stretched from Nubia in the west to far northern Somalia in the east. They supported themselves by gathering wild grains. The first elements of Egyptian culture were laid down two thousand years later, between 12,000 and 10,000 B.C., when some of these Afrasian communities expanded northward into Egypt, bringing with them a language directly ancestral to ancient Egyptian. -

Christopher Ehret
Professor of History, African Studies Chair
University of California at Los Angeles
 
Posted by KemsonReloaded (Member # 14127) on :
 
quote:
It simply applies to the classification of a particular African language phylum that emerged in east Africa over 10,000 years ago, which should very well be labeled "African", but isn't.
quote:
...it...designates this said language phylum that is found spoken through out Africa and SW Asia, but predominantly in Africa, where it emerged
As I said, there is no such thing as "Afrasian" or "Afriasian". "Negro-Egyptian" is the correct term. Even if it's spoken outside Africa, it belongs to the Negro or Black African language family and should be termed as such (Negro-Egyptian).
 
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
 
^ Sundiata is correct, and YOU incorrect as usual. Your claims were alreadly disputed here. [Embarrassed]
 
Posted by prmiddleeastern (Member # 14038) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
^But they are not Africans, so your point is moot basically.. This of course goes back to your silly implication of "black" being an ethnic appellation. [Big Grin]

but Egyptians are for sure, but are they of the Sub-Saharan race.
 
Posted by Issawi (Member # 13582) on :
 
This is kind of funny..... Yonis2 posts a few images of Egyptians people that look just like the scenes on the ancient tomb walls in egypt with the features/skin color and all that, and the little egyptian boy that looks like the Tutankhamun portrait with the same brown-bronze color of the the king, then someone pastes a few pictures mostly of Nubian people with black skin who look the like the tomb images of Nubians but not like the Egyptians at all? That's pretty pathetic. I guess you assume people are blind, or you're 12 years old? this forum seems controlled mostly by black people who desperately want to believe the Egyptians were once black so they pass off Nubian people as Egyptians.
 
Posted by Sundiata (Member # 13096) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by prmiddleeastern:
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
[qb] ^But they are not Africans, so your point is moot basically.. This of course goes back to your silly implication of "black" being an ethnic appellation. [Big Grin]

but Egyptians are for sure, but are they of the Sub-Saharan race.
1) What on God's green earth is a "sub-Saharan race"? [Confused]

"sub-Saharan Africa does not define/delimit authentic Africanity" - Keita, S. (2005)


2)
quote:
Studies of linkage disequilibrium and allelic variation at a mini-satellite locus suggests that "Hamitic" Africoids are descended from sub-Saharan Africans, the differences in trait probably due to genetic drift and environmental selection. Ancient Egyptian populations with ‘non-Negroid” facial features are most similar to these modern "Hamitic" (Elongated Africoid) populations of Northeast Africa. Preliminary studies with Mitochondrial DNA also suggest affiliations with sub-Sharan Africans for ancient Egyptians and some modern Egyptian groups. Within an evolutionary paradigm, differences between Upper and Lower Egyptians once thought to be racially-influenced differences, can now be alternatively interpreted as clinal variation, an expression of environmental selection. The ancient Egyptians have limb proportions and other features of their stature that are the same as all other African populations but different from Caucasoids in Europe and Asia. These adaptations indicate a long period of evolution in tropical regions. Since Egypt is not in tropical Africa, these observations reinforce sub-Saharan Africa as the region of origin for the ancient Egyptians. Collectively, all of these data strongly support an African bio-historical affiliation for the ancient Egyptians and their closest relationships with other Africoids. The ancient Egyptians were most similar to populations inhabiting Northeast Africa, which included variants with Broad (Negroid), Elongated (Hamitic) and Nilotic facial traits.
- Crawford, Keith. "The Biological Relationship of The Ancient Egyptians to Other Populations"
 
Posted by blackman (Member # 1807) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Issawi:
This is kind of funny..... this forum seems controlled mostly by black people who desperately want to believe the Egyptians were once black so they pass off Nubian people as Egyptians.

It's funny how people like you desprerately try to prove otherwise. There is a sticky at the top of this forum and other threads addressing and proving the original Ancient Egyptians (Kemetians) as indigenous Black Africans.

You are welcome to start a new thread to try and prove otherwise.
 
Posted by Sundiata (Member # 13096) on :
 
^Not to mention that everyone here isn't black. There's everything from Filipinos to Modern Egyptians who contribute to this site, most of whom hold this same justifiable view.
 
Posted by rasol (Member # 4592) on :
 
quote:
They pass off Nubian people as Egyptians.
Nubia is a part of Egypt and Sudan.

Nubians are either Egyptian or Sudanese.

Nubia is a *modern* ethnic reference, Sudan and Egypt are modern nationalities, not ethnicties.

There is no *nubian* ethnicity from Dynastic times.

Nor were there any *arabs* in ancient Kmt.

The modern 'upper egyptians' and 'nubians' are certainly descendant from the ancient NATIVE nile vally Africans of Kemet [Egypt] and Kush whom they resemble.

Modern Egyptians of the delta such as Hawass, resemble Syrian, Greek and other non native intruders to the Nile Valley.

And they know this.

That's why they hate the *nubians* so much.
 
Posted by Ebony Allen (Member # 12771) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Issawi:
This is kind of funny..... Yonis2 posts a few images of Egyptians people that look just like the scenes on the ancient tomb walls in egypt with the features/skin color and all that, and the little egyptian boy that looks like the Tutankhamun portrait with the same brown-bronze color of the the king, then someone pastes a few pictures mostly of Nubian people with black skin who look the like the tomb images of Nubians but not like the Egyptians at all? That's pretty pathetic. I guess you assume people are blind, or you're 12 years old? this forum seems controlled mostly by black people who desperately want to believe the Egyptians were once black so they pass off Nubian people as Egyptians.

It's funnhy how white supremacists take into account the facial features on the statues of the ancient Egyptians like their straight noses and thin lips to prove that they were white, when East African blacks have had these features before whites existed. That's pretty pathetic. I guess you assume people are stupid. I believe whites are so desperate to claim that they were white by using false science.
 
Posted by Ebony Allen (Member # 12771) on :
 
It looks like this forum has once again been invaded by a few new trolls.
 
Posted by osiriun (Member # 14297) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Issawi:
This is kind of funny..... Yonis2 posts a few images of Egyptians people that look just like the scenes on the ancient tomb walls in egypt with the features/skin color and all that, and the little egyptian boy that looks like the Tutankhamun portrait with the same brown-bronze color of the the king, then someone pastes a few pictures mostly of Nubian people with black skin who look the like the tomb images of Nubians but not like the Egyptians at all? That's pretty pathetic. I guess you assume people are blind, or you're 12 years old? this forum seems controlled mostly by black people who desperately want to believe the Egyptians were once black so they pass off Nubian people as Egyptians.

It really comes down to your perception of the race of the Somalian people since gentically speaking they are the closest to what the original Northeast Africans were before subsequent Eurasian and European admixture.

There's little argument in terms of genetic evidence supporting any other conclusion. So its not about just pictures of a few African looking Egyptians anymore, there's far more to it than that: Linguistic, Archaelogical, and Skeletal evidence supporting an African Egypt with people originating somewhere in the Sahara. But this conclusion is also supported by the original father of Egyptology:

Jean Francois Champollion

And the father of history: Herodotus

“The Colchians, Ethiopians and Egyptians have thick lips,
broad nose, woolly hair and they are burnt of skin.”
— 450 BC
 
Posted by Ebony Allen (Member # 12771) on :
 
There is not that much Eurasian and European admixture in Somalis.
 
Posted by osiriun (Member # 14297) on :
 
I was referring to the Egyptians themselves.
 
Posted by Issawi (Member # 13582) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
Modern Egyptians who contribute to this site, most of whom hold this same justifiable view.

ha....in your dreams. Pretending to be Egyptians maybe, but any real Egyptian recognizes Egyptian and Nubian people right away. Anyone who is not blind, or is desparate to believe the egyptians were black, can see that the pictures of the Egyptians posted by Yonis2 look exactly like the tomb wall portraits of the ancient Egyptians. The Nubians are similar to the Egyptians in culture only. They are one of 2 black african peoples in Egypt (the Besharin are the other one). They speak a language that has nothing to do with the language written in hieroglyphs. The Egyptian Christians still pray in the ancient egyptian language.... You people seem so deluded you talk among yourselves so much that you start believing your own lies. No wonder no one takes this crap seriously outside of these little circles.
 
Posted by osiriun (Member # 14297) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Issawi:
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
Modern Egyptians who contribute to this site, most of whom hold this same justifiable view.

ha....in your dreams. Pretending to be Egyptians maybe, but any real Egyptian recognizes Egyptian and Nubian people right away. Anyone who is not blind, or is desparate to believe the egyptians were black, can see that the pictures of the Egyptians posted by Yonis2 look exactly like the tomb wall portraits of the ancient Egyptians. The Nubians are similar to the Egyptians in culture only. They are one of 2 black african peoples in Egypt (the Besharin are the other one). They speak a language that has nothing to do with the language written in hieroglyphs. The Egyptian Christians still pray in the ancient egyptian language.... You people seem so deluded you talk among yourselves so much that you start believing your own lies. No wonder no one takes this crap seriously outside of these little circles.
So what is you opinion in terms of the origins of the Ancient Egyptian people? Are they African, Eurasian of European people?
 
Posted by Ebony Allen (Member # 12771) on :
 
Issawi, quit talking out of your ass and provide us with some evidence that they weren't black besides hearsay.
 
Posted by osiriun (Member # 14297) on :
 
If we leave the question up to perception then the Egyptians could just as well be Chinese..hmm, actually I remember reading a book years ago that suggested just that.
 
Posted by prmiddleeastern (Member # 14038) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
quote:
Originally posted by prmiddleeastern:
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
[qb] ^But they are not Africans, so your point is moot basically.. This of course goes back to your silly implication of "black" being an ethnic appellation. [Big Grin]

but Egyptians are for sure, but are they of the Sub-Saharan race.
1) What on God's green earth is a "sub-Saharan race"? [Confused]

"sub-Saharan Africa does not define/delimit authentic Africanity" - Keita, S. (2005)


2)
quote:
Studies of linkage disequilibrium and allelic variation at a mini-satellite locus suggests that "Hamitic" Africoids are descended from sub-Saharan Africans, the differences in trait probably due to genetic drift and environmental selection. Ancient Egyptian populations with ‘non-Negroid” facial features are most similar to these modern "Hamitic" (Elongated Africoid) populations of Northeast Africa. Preliminary studies with Mitochondrial DNA also suggest affiliations with sub-Sharan Africans for ancient Egyptians and some modern Egyptian groups. Within an evolutionary paradigm, differences between Upper and Lower Egyptians once thought to be racially-influenced differences, can now be alternatively interpreted as clinal variation, an expression of environmental selection. The ancient Egyptians have limb proportions and other features of their stature that are the same as all other African populations but different from Caucasoids in Europe and Asia. These adaptations indicate a long period of evolution in tropical regions. Since Egypt is not in tropical Africa, these observations reinforce sub-Saharan Africa as the region of origin for the ancient Egyptians. Collectively, all of these data strongly support an African bio-historical affiliation for the ancient Egyptians and their closest relationships with other Africoids. The ancient Egyptians were most similar to populations inhabiting Northeast Africa, which included variants with Broad (Negroid), Elongated (Hamitic) and Nilotic facial traits.
- Crawford, Keith. "The Biological Relationship of The Ancient Egyptians to Other Populations"

sub-saharan African are the black Africans, the negroid ones.
 
Posted by osiriun (Member # 14297) on :
 
Here is a Sub-Saharan Black:

 -

And here is another Sub-Saharan Black:

 -

And if we go way down to South Africa:

 -

Maybe you are simply ignorant on what Black Africans look like?
 
Posted by Ebony Allen (Member # 12771) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by prmiddleeastern:
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
quote:
Originally posted by prmiddleeastern:
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
[qb] ^But they are not Africans, so your point is moot basically.. This of course goes back to your silly implication of "black" being an ethnic appellation. [Big Grin]

but Egyptians are for sure, but are they of the Sub-Saharan race.
1) What on God's green earth is a "sub-Saharan race"? [Confused]

"sub-Saharan Africa does not define/delimit authentic Africanity" - Keita, S. (2005)


2)
quote:
Studies of linkage disequilibrium and allelic variation at a mini-satellite locus suggests that "Hamitic" Africoids are descended from sub-Saharan Africans, the differences in trait probably due to genetic drift and environmental selection. Ancient Egyptian populations with ‘non-Negroid” facial features are most similar to these modern "Hamitic" (Elongated Africoid) populations of Northeast Africa. Preliminary studies with Mitochondrial DNA also suggest affiliations with sub-Sharan Africans for ancient Egyptians and some modern Egyptian groups. Within an evolutionary paradigm, differences between Upper and Lower Egyptians once thought to be racially-influenced differences, can now be alternatively interpreted as clinal variation, an expression of environmental selection. The ancient Egyptians have limb proportions and other features of their stature that are the same as all other African populations but different from Caucasoids in Europe and Asia. These adaptations indicate a long period of evolution in tropical regions. Since Egypt is not in tropical Africa, these observations reinforce sub-Saharan Africa as the region of origin for the ancient Egyptians. Collectively, all of these data strongly support an African bio-historical affiliation for the ancient Egyptians and their closest relationships with other Africoids. The ancient Egyptians were most similar to populations inhabiting Northeast Africa, which included variants with Broad (Negroid), Elongated (Hamitic) and Nilotic facial traits.
- Crawford, Keith. "The Biological Relationship of The Ancient Egyptians to Other Populations"

sub-saharan African are the black Africans, the negroid ones.
The Negroid ones??? Negroid is an invalid term anyway. And are you trying to say that there are Negroid and non-Negroid black Africans??
 
Posted by rasol (Member # 4592) on :
 
quote:
sub-saharan African are the black Africans, the negroid ones.
The original inhabits of the sahara, were Blacks. - geneticist, Cavelli Sforza.


As for the original, or indigenous population of Egypt:

“Oldest human skeleton found in Egypt”. Nazlet Khater man was the earliest modern human skeleton found near Luxor, in 1980. The remains was dated from between 35,000 and 30,000 years ago.

“Strong alveolar prognathism combined with fossa praenasalis in an African skull is suggestive of Negroid morphology [form & structure]. The radio-humeral index of Nazlet Khater is practically the same as the mean of Taforalt (76.6). According to Ferembach (1965) this value is near to the Negroid average.” The burial was of a young man of 17-20 years old, whose skeleton lay in a 160cm- long narrow ditch aligned from east to west. A flint tool, which was laid carefully on the bottom of the grave, dates the burial as contemporaneous with a nearby flint quarry. The morphological features of the Nazlet Khater skeleton were analysed by Thoma (1984). The 35,000 year old skeleton was examined using multivariate statistical procedures. In the first part, principal components analysis is performed on a dataset of mandible dimensions of 220 fossils, sub-fossils and modern specimens, ranging in time from the Late Pleistocene to recent and restricted in space to the African continent and Southern Levant.


Thoma A., Morphology and Affinities of the Nazlet Khater Man; Journal of Human Evolution, vol. 13, 1984.


As for the middle-east - THIS CONCEPT IS A JOKE.

It was invented by the British in the 19th century, in order to help them steal oil from Persians and Arabs.

The concept has no meaning except as political propaganda quoted mindlessly by sheep, who repeat anything they learned from the likes of Margaret Thatcher or Henry Kissenger.

It is historically, geographically, linguistically and culturally....non-existent.
 
Posted by songhai (Member # 13721) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:
Here is a Sub-Saharan Black:

 -

And here is another Sub-Saharan Black:

 -

And if we go way down to South Africa:

 -

Maybe you are simply ignorant on what Black Africans look like?

Oh yeah. If we go way way down South . . . like Georgia, they look like Congressman John Lewis:

 -
 
Posted by Sundiata (Member # 13096) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Issawi:
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
Modern Egyptians who contribute to this site, most of whom hold this same justifiable view.

ha....in your dreams. Pretending to be Egyptians maybe, but any real Egyptian recognizes Egyptian and Nubian people right away. Anyone who is not blind, or is desparate to believe the egyptians were black, can see that the pictures of the Egyptians posted by Yonis2 look exactly like the tomb wall portraits of the ancient Egyptians. The Nubians are similar to the Egyptians in culture only. They are one of 2 black african peoples in Egypt (the Besharin are the other one). They speak a language that has nothing to do with the language written in hieroglyphs. The Egyptian Christians still pray in the ancient egyptian language.... You people seem so deluded you talk among yourselves so much that you start believing your own lies. No wonder no one takes this crap seriously outside of these little circles.
Foolish child.. There is nothing at all indicating a separation from ancient Sudanese populations and ancient Egyptians. In fact, a recent 2006 study by Brace suggests a greater similarity with modern Nubian ethnic groups to ancient Egyptians than modern Egyptians with the latter.

quote:
"The Niger-Congo speakers, Congo, Dahomey and Haya, cluster closely with each other and a bit less closely with the Nubian sample both the recent and the Bronze Age Nubians and more remotely with the Naqada Bronze Age sample of Egypt, the modern Somalis, and the Arabic-speaking Fellaheen (farmers) of Israel. When those samples are separated and run in a single analysis as in Fig. 1, there clearly is a tie between them that is diluted the farther one gets from sub-Saharan Africa". The other obvious matter shown in Fig. 3 is the separate identity of the northern Europeans.
- Brace (2006)

Among the foreigners, the Nubians were closest ethnically to the Egyptians. - Yurco


But of course your wishful thinking would like to suggest some type of false dichotomy and overlap with European or fabled "Caucasoid" groups that have absolutely nothing to do with African biohistory. The tropical body plans of ancient egyptians also further reinforce the fact that you speak nonsense.
 
Posted by Sundiata (Member # 13096) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:
Here is a Sub-Saharan Black:

 -

And here is another Sub-Saharan Black:

 -

And if we go way down to South Africa:

 -

Maybe you are simply ignorant on what Black Africans look like?

Obviously my question wasn't addressed by the poster above you so I will reiterate it..

What on God's green earth is a "sub-Saharan race"?
 
Posted by Yom (Member # 11256) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Issawi:
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
Modern Egyptians who contribute to this site, most of whom hold this same justifiable view.

ha....in your dreams. Pretending to be Egyptians maybe, but any real Egyptian recognizes Egyptian and Nubian people right away. Anyone who is not blind, or is desparate to believe the egyptians were black, can see that the pictures of the Egyptians posted by Yonis2 look exactly like the tomb wall portraits of the ancient Egyptians. The Nubians are similar to the Egyptians in culture only. They are one of 2 black african peoples in Egypt (the Besharin are the other one). They speak a language that has nothing to do with the language written in hieroglyphs. The Egyptian Christians still pray in the ancient egyptian language.... You people seem so deluded you talk among yourselves so much that you start believing your own lies. No wonder no one takes this crap seriously outside of these little circles.
The Bisharin are Beja and Beja (To-bedawie) speakers, an Afro-Asiatic language like Ancient Egyptian, and possibly the closest to the AE language. They're probably the best representatives still living in Egypt that have a phenotype similar to that of the ancient Egyptians. The Ababda are another Beja tribe living in Egypt north of the Bisharin, but some of them are mixed with Arabs.
 
Posted by Issawi (Member # 13582) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Yom:
quote:
Originally posted by Issawi:
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
Modern Egyptians who contribute to this site, most of whom hold this same justifiable view.

ha....in your dreams. Pretending to be Egyptians maybe, but any real Egyptian recognizes Egyptian and Nubian people right away. Anyone who is not blind, or is desparate to believe the egyptians were black, can see that the pictures of the Egyptians posted by Yonis2 look exactly like the tomb wall portraits of the ancient Egyptians. The Nubians are similar to the Egyptians in culture only. They are one of 2 black african peoples in Egypt (the Besharin are the other one). They speak a language that has nothing to do with the language written in hieroglyphs. The Egyptian Christians still pray in the ancient egyptian language.... You people seem so deluded you talk among yourselves so much that you start believing your own lies. No wonder no one takes this crap seriously outside of these little circles.
The Bisharin are Beja and Beja (To-bedawie) speakers, an Afro-Asiatic language like Ancient Egyptian, and possibly the closest to the AE language. They're probably the best representatives still living in Egypt that have a phenotype similar to that of the ancient Egyptians. The Ababda are another Beja tribe living in Egypt north of the Bisharin, but some of them are mixed with Arabs.
I was talking about the Nubians who have a completely different language... and I am sorry to see you as deluded as your friends. The Besharin were known to the ancient Egyptians and were depicted much like the Nubian people, not Egyptians. The ancient Egyptians look just like the people in the pictures posted by Yonis2, anybody who looks at them can see that. It's clear that most of you have never been to Egypt, which is why you sound like you have no clue what you're talking about.
 
Posted by Ebony Allen (Member # 12771) on :
 
People can research and learn the truth about the ancient Egyptians without going to Egypt.
 
Posted by Doug M (Member # 7650) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Issawi:
quote:
Originally posted by Yom:
quote:
Originally posted by Issawi:
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
Modern Egyptians who contribute to this site, most of whom hold this same justifiable view.

ha....in your dreams. Pretending to be Egyptians maybe, but any real Egyptian recognizes Egyptian and Nubian people right away. Anyone who is not blind, or is desparate to believe the egyptians were black, can see that the pictures of the Egyptians posted by Yonis2 look exactly like the tomb wall portraits of the ancient Egyptians. The Nubians are similar to the Egyptians in culture only. They are one of 2 black african peoples in Egypt (the Besharin are the other one). They speak a language that has nothing to do with the language written in hieroglyphs. The Egyptian Christians still pray in the ancient egyptian language.... You people seem so deluded you talk among yourselves so much that you start believing your own lies. No wonder no one takes this crap seriously outside of these little circles.
The Bisharin are Beja and Beja (To-bedawie) speakers, an Afro-Asiatic language like Ancient Egyptian, and possibly the closest to the AE language. They're probably the best representatives still living in Egypt that have a phenotype similar to that of the ancient Egyptians. The Ababda are another Beja tribe living in Egypt north of the Bisharin, but some of them are mixed with Arabs.
I was talking about the Nubians who have a completely different language... and I am sorry to see you as deluded as your friends. The Besharin were known to the ancient Egyptians and were depicted much like the Nubian people, not Egyptians. The ancient Egyptians look just like the people in the pictures posted by Yonis2, anybody who looks at them can see that. It's clear that most of you have never been to Egypt, which is why you sound like you have no clue what you're talking about.
Ancient Egyptians were closer to the ancestral populations of the Beja and Bisharin than modern Egyptians. Some modern Egyptians have heavy influence from outside of Egypt and therefore many don't match the phenotype of ancient Egypt.

Tomb of Djehutymes:
 -

Tomb of Sennefer:
 -

 -

 -

Match these people:

 -

 -

And makes any attempt to claim that these are the best example of ancient types found in dynastic Egypt purely nonsense:

 -
 
Posted by Issawi (Member # 13582) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doug M:
quote:
Originally posted by Issawi:
quote:
Originally posted by Yom:
quote:
Originally posted by Issawi:
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
Modern Egyptians who contribute to this site, most of whom hold this same justifiable view.

ha....in your dreams. Pretending to be Egyptians maybe, but any real Egyptian recognizes Egyptian and Nubian people right away. Anyone who is not blind, or is desparate to believe the egyptians were black, can see that the pictures of the Egyptians posted by Yonis2 look exactly like the tomb wall portraits of the ancient Egyptians. The Nubians are similar to the Egyptians in culture only. They are one of 2 black african peoples in Egypt (the Besharin are the other one). They speak a language that has nothing to do with the language written in hieroglyphs. The Egyptian Christians still pray in the ancient egyptian language.... You people seem so deluded you talk among yourselves so much that you start believing your own lies. No wonder no one takes this crap seriously outside of these little circles.
The Bisharin are Beja and Beja (To-bedawie) speakers, an Afro-Asiatic language like Ancient Egyptian, and possibly the closest to the AE language. They're probably the best representatives still living in Egypt that have a phenotype similar to that of the ancient Egyptians. The Ababda are another Beja tribe living in Egypt north of the Bisharin, but some of them are mixed with Arabs.
I was talking about the Nubians who have a completely different language... and I am sorry to see you as deluded as your friends. The Besharin were known to the ancient Egyptians and were depicted much like the Nubian people, not Egyptians. The ancient Egyptians look just like the people in the pictures posted by Yonis2, anybody who looks at them can see that. It's clear that most of you have never been to Egypt, which is why you sound like you have no clue what you're talking about.
Ancient Egyptians were closer to the ancestral populations of the Beja and Bisharin than modern Egyptians. Some modern Egyptians have heavy influence from outside of Egypt and therefore many don't match the phenotype of ancient Egypt.


It doesn't matter how many times you paste the pictures of Nubians because it's clear that they don't look like the ancient Egyptians but more like the ancient Nubians.... It's hilarious that you post portraits of light-skinned ancient egyptian women and say that they look like modern black Nubians. You probably tell yourselves that the women's color is not real but conveniently the men's color is. But don't let me interfere with your delusions.

The Egyptian children look just like the ancient Egyptian children
 -
 
Posted by prmiddleeastern (Member # 14038) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ebony Allen:
quote:
Originally posted by prmiddleeastern:
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
quote:
Originally posted by prmiddleeastern:
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
[qb] ^But they are not Africans, so your point is moot basically.. This of course goes back to your silly implication of "black" being an ethnic appellation. [Big Grin]

but Egyptians are for sure, but are they of the Sub-Saharan race.
1) What on God's green earth is a "sub-Saharan race"? [Confused]

"sub-Saharan Africa does not define/delimit authentic Africanity" - Keita, S. (2005)


2)
quote:
Studies of linkage disequilibrium and allelic variation at a mini-satellite locus suggests that "Hamitic" Africoids are descended from sub-Saharan Africans, the differences in trait probably due to genetic drift and environmental selection. Ancient Egyptian populations with ‘non-Negroid” facial features are most similar to these modern "Hamitic" (Elongated Africoid) populations of Northeast Africa. Preliminary studies with Mitochondrial DNA also suggest affiliations with sub-Sharan Africans for ancient Egyptians and some modern Egyptian groups. Within an evolutionary paradigm, differences between Upper and Lower Egyptians once thought to be racially-influenced differences, can now be alternatively interpreted as clinal variation, an expression of environmental selection. The ancient Egyptians have limb proportions and other features of their stature that are the same as all other African populations but different from Caucasoids in Europe and Asia. These adaptations indicate a long period of evolution in tropical regions. Since Egypt is not in tropical Africa, these observations reinforce sub-Saharan Africa as the region of origin for the ancient Egyptians. Collectively, all of these data strongly support an African bio-historical affiliation for the ancient Egyptians and their closest relationships with other Africoids. The ancient Egyptians were most similar to populations inhabiting Northeast Africa, which included variants with Broad (Negroid), Elongated (Hamitic) and Nilotic facial traits.
- Crawford, Keith. "The Biological Relationship of The Ancient Egyptians to Other Populations"

sub-saharan African are the black Africans, the negroid ones.
The Negroid ones??? Negroid is an invalid term anyway. And are you trying to say that there are Negroid and non-Negroid black Africans??
there are only negroid Black Africans, the sub-saharid ones
 
Posted by Sundiata (Member # 13096) on :
 
^^@ Issawi.. The scientifically illiterate usually make it a habit of arguing ethnic identity by way of portraiture. Though curiously, why do you suppose that the pictures doug posted represent Sudanese people and how is posting a picture of a pygmy Egyptian and a non-colored statue of a woman going to prove your case? If you believe that there is that much of a contrast between women and men in ancient Egypt, and that this is not simply artistic convention, then of course you're the only loon in this thread. Please take note to the first thread topic at the top of this forum.


@ prmiddleeastern

Negroids don't exist. There is too much variability all over Africa to look for such a distinctly defined entity. Though for argument's sake, if there was a such thing, Egyptians would be included since there's no break between the supposed "classical negro" and that of the ancient Egyptian:

The nature of the body plan was also investigated by comparing the intermembral, brachial, and crural indices for these samples with values obtained from the literature. No significant differences were found in either index through time for either sex. The raw values in Table 6 suggest that Egyptians had the “super-Negroid” body plan described by Robins (1983). - Sonia Zakrzewski
 
Posted by rasol (Member # 4592) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Yom:
The Bisharin are Beja and Beja (To-bedawie) speakers, an Afro-Asiatic language like Ancient Egyptian, and possibly the closest to the AE language. They're probably the best representatives still living in Egypt that have a phenotype similar to that of the ancient Egyptians. The Ababda are another Beja tribe living in Egypt north of the Bisharin, but some of them are mixed with Arabs.

Good job correcting ignorance Yom.


quote:
Iss writes: No wonder no one takes this crap seriously outside of these little circles
^ Actually this forum is taken very seriously, which is why people like you are directed to it for purposes of education.

Not our fault if you don't know the relationship between Beja language and Ancient Egyptian language, as opposed to Nubian languages which are in a different family.

Your inability to learn, and your tendency to spit venom in frustration is why no one takes you seriously.

We just have fun with your likes, while we educate smarter people. [Smile]
 
Posted by rasol (Member # 4592) on :
 
^ By the way, when Champollion visited Egypt and deciphered the ancient text, he stated exactly as Yom did ->

* Beja and Nubians were the best representatives for the Ancient Egyptians.

* Modern delta-Copts - he said - we 'mongrelised' with Greeks, Romans, and Asiatics, which is why they [obviously to anyone with eyes] don't resemble Ancient Egyptians.

This makes some people angry, but this is what Champollion stated.

Anyone who doesn't like this, doesn't believe, doesn't agree, or just feels like crying about it, can ask for direct quotes of Champollion or for other sources, or just ask questions.

We are happy to continue your education. [Smile]
 
Posted by Doug M (Member # 7650) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Issawi:
quote:
Originally posted by Doug M:
quote:
Originally posted by Issawi:
quote:
Originally posted by Yom:
quote:
Originally posted by Issawi:
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
Modern Egyptians who contribute to this site, most of whom hold this same justifiable view.

ha....in your dreams. Pretending to be Egyptians maybe, but any real Egyptian recognizes Egyptian and Nubian people right away. Anyone who is not blind, or is desparate to believe the egyptians were black, can see that the pictures of the Egyptians posted by Yonis2 look exactly like the tomb wall portraits of the ancient Egyptians. The Nubians are similar to the Egyptians in culture only. They are one of 2 black african peoples in Egypt (the Besharin are the other one). They speak a language that has nothing to do with the language written in hieroglyphs. The Egyptian Christians still pray in the ancient egyptian language.... You people seem so deluded you talk among yourselves so much that you start believing your own lies. No wonder no one takes this crap seriously outside of these little circles.
The Bisharin are Beja and Beja (To-bedawie) speakers, an Afro-Asiatic language like Ancient Egyptian, and possibly the closest to the AE language. They're probably the best representatives still living in Egypt that have a phenotype similar to that of the ancient Egyptians. The Ababda are another Beja tribe living in Egypt north of the Bisharin, but some of them are mixed with Arabs.
I was talking about the Nubians who have a completely different language... and I am sorry to see you as deluded as your friends. The Besharin were known to the ancient Egyptians and were depicted much like the Nubian people, not Egyptians. The ancient Egyptians look just like the people in the pictures posted by Yonis2, anybody who looks at them can see that. It's clear that most of you have never been to Egypt, which is why you sound like you have no clue what you're talking about.
Ancient Egyptians were closer to the ancestral populations of the Beja and Bisharin than modern Egyptians. Some modern Egyptians have heavy influence from outside of Egypt and therefore many don't match the phenotype of ancient Egypt.


It doesn't matter how many times you paste the pictures of Nubians because it's clear that they don't look like the ancient Egyptians but more like the ancient Nubians.... It's hilarious that you post portraits of light-skinned ancient egyptian women and say that they look like modern black Nubians. You probably tell yourselves that the women's color is not real but conveniently the men's color is. But don't let me interfere with your delusions.

The Egyptian children look just like the ancient Egyptian children
 -

As an obvious testament that you don't know what you are talking about, you post an image of an African pygmy in Egypt and don't realize that Egyptians always identified dwarves as being representative of the ORIGINAL BLACK AFRICAN population of the Nile and the basis and reason for the God Bes, who was openly and clearly portrayed as a black African dwarf. Again, a prime example of people taking and distorting African history and culture. Where the ancient Egyptians saw themselves as connected to Africa ("God's Land") and its culture, you and others try and separate it, going AGAINST the ancients and their world view.


http://www.ancientegyptonline.co.uk/bes.html

http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/dwarfs.htm

The image you posted is of a black African Egyptian dwarf, whom the ancient Egyptians considered as a supreme form of their ties WITH AFRICA and not the NONSENSE you are talking about. And the woman was originally painted YELLOW, not plain white. But of course what does that matter to someone who believes in nonsense.

Good example of such a reddish brown black African dwarf and his excellent dancing skills:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMPzM8ss45U
 
Posted by prmiddleeastern (Member # 14038) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
@ prmiddleeastern

Negroids don't exist. There is too much variability all over Africa to look for such a distinctly defined entity. Though for argument's sake, if there was a such thing, Egyptians would be included since there's no break between the supposed "classical negro" and that of the ancient Egyptian:

The nature of the body plan was also investigated by comparing the intermembral, brachial, and crural indices for these samples with values obtained from the literature. No significant differences were found in either index through time for either sex. The raw values in Table 6 suggest that Egyptians had the “super-Negroid” body plan described by Robins (1983). - Sonia Zakrzewski

yes, they resemble negroes, but their skin is lighter.
 
Posted by prmiddleeastern (Member # 14038) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by osiriun:
Here is a Sub-Saharan Black:

 -

And here is another Sub-Saharan Black:

 -

And if we go way down to South Africa:

 -

Maybe you are simply ignorant on what Black Africans look like?

Yes, there are diversity in looks on Black Africans, perhaps in skin color they are related to each other, from brown to black.
 
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
 
^ Calling all new trolls,.. attention new trolls,.. there is a thread right at the very top of the board entitled The Race of the Ancient Egyptians, as well as a search engine that will allow you to look at all the past threads in the archives. All of this should educate your poor ignorant minds on the issue of 'race' and the ethnic identity of the Egyptians! [Embarrassed]
 
Posted by prmiddleeastern (Member # 14038) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Djehuti:
^ Calling all new trolls,.. attention new trolls,.. there is a thread right at the very top of the board entitled The Race of the Ancient Egyptians, as well as a search engine that will allow you to look at all the past threads in the archives. All of this should educate your poor ignorant minds on the issue of 'race' and the ethnic identity of the Egyptians! [Embarrassed]

Thanks. [Frown]
 
Posted by Ebony Allen (Member # 12771) on :
 
Excuse me, prmiddleeastern, Africans are not related throught skin color. If that was the case then many South Indians and Aboriginals would be related to black Africans, but they're not. And Africans also have much more diverse characteristics besides skin color.
 
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Issawi:

It doesn't matter how many times you paste the pictures of Nubians because it's clear that they don't look like the ancient Egyptians but more like the ancient Nubians....

And I find it hilarious how Afrangi Egyptians keep this incessant denial that all those photos of black people in Egypt are actual Egyptians and NOT 'Nubians'. In fact many scholars and Egyptologists from Champollion to modern day Frank Yurco (R.I.P) and even Zahi Hawass has stated that the rural Fellahin of Upper Egypt best represent how their ancestors (the ancient Egyptians) look like!

All of these people are NOT Nubians but Egyptians from rural Sa'id!

 -

 -

 -

They match the ancient paintings in both color and features:

 -


 -

 -

 -  -

The problem is that you have heavily-mixed, light-skinned, modern Egyptians mostly northerners, who deny that their ancient ancestors as indigenous Africans were black as well as deny that they themselves are mixed and instead make the deluded claim that their ancient ancestors (who are black) look just like them!! What's worse is that their modern anti-black sentiments which is the very reason for their denial, is the very antithesis of their ancient ancestors who called themselves Kememu-- black people! LOL
 
Posted by Doug M (Member # 7650) on :
 
Explanation of the meaning of afrangi and baladi:

http://books.google.com/books?id=ZR3rqNFBaUYC&pg=PA53&lpg=PA53&dq=afrangi&source=web&ots=nk_Yxj0bdm&sig=caMBSZR4MScTJtpCkNCHEVyL_bc#PPA55,M1
 
Posted by prmiddleeastern (Member # 14038) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ebony Allen:
Excuse me, prmiddleeastern, Africans are not related throught skin color. If that was the case then many South Indians and Aboriginals would be related to black Africans, but they're not. And Africans also have much more diverse characteristics besides skin color.

yes,I know about it, some are tall, some are small, and more distinct features.
 
Posted by Alive-(What Box) (Member # 10819) on :
 
Nice thread.
 
Posted by Jari-Ankhamun (Member # 14451) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Issawi:
quote:
Originally posted by Doug M:
quote:
Originally posted by Issawi:
quote:
Originally posted by Yom:
quote:
Originally posted by Issawi:
quote:
Originally posted by Sundiata:
Modern Egyptians who contribute to this site, most of whom hold this same justifiable view.

ha....in your dreams. Pretending to be Egyptians maybe, but any real Egyptian recognizes Egyptian and Nubian people right away. Anyone who is not blind, or is desparate to believe the egyptians were black, can see that the pictures of the Egyptians posted by Yonis2 look exactly like the tomb wall portraits of the ancient Egyptians. The Nubians are similar to the Egyptians in culture only. They are one of 2 black african peoples in Egypt (the Besharin are the other one). They speak a language that has nothing to do with the language written in hieroglyphs. The Egyptian Christians still pray in the ancient egyptian language.... You people seem so deluded you talk among yourselves so much that you start believing your own lies. No wonder no one takes this crap seriously outside of these little circles.
The Bisharin are Beja and Beja (To-bedawie) speakers, an Afro-Asiatic language like Ancient Egyptian, and possibly the closest to the AE language. They're probably the best representatives still living in Egypt that have a phenotype similar to that of the ancient Egyptians. The Ababda are another Beja tribe living in Egypt north of the Bisharin, but some of them are mixed with Arabs.
I was talking about the Nubians who have a completely different language... and I am sorry to see you as deluded as your friends. The Besharin were known to the ancient Egyptians and were depicted much like the Nubian people, not Egyptians. The ancient Egyptians look just like the people in the pictures posted by Yonis2, anybody who looks at them can see that. It's clear that most of you have never been to Egypt, which is why you sound like you have no clue what you're talking about.
Ancient Egyptians were closer to the ancestral populations of the Beja and Bisharin than modern Egyptians. Some modern Egyptians have heavy influence from outside of Egypt and therefore many don't match the phenotype of ancient Egypt.


It doesn't matter how many times you paste the pictures of Nubians because it's clear that they don't look like the ancient Egyptians but more like the ancient Nubians.... It's hilarious that you post portraits of light-skinned ancient egyptian women and say that they look like modern black Nubians. You probably tell yourselves that the women's color is not real but conveniently the men's color is. But don't let me interfere with your delusions.

The Egyptian children look just like the ancient Egyptian children
 -

First off, the is no such thing as a "Nubian". That term was used by the Racist Egyptologists to seperate Kmt, from Africa.

Second, The culture, people, plant life, language of Kmt come from sub-sahran Africa.

Third, the picture you posted is not that reliable to show the people of Kmt. The so called Nubian people were dipicted with dark skin as well as the same skin color as the Egyptians.
 
Posted by rasol (Member # 4592) on :
 
quote:
It's hilarious that you post portraits of light-skinned ancient egyptian women and say that they look like modern black Nubians
^ What's hilarious is how easy to refute your remarks is:


A comparison with neighboring Nile Valley skeletal samples suggests that the high status cemetery represents an endogamous ruling or elite segment of the local population at Naqada, which is more closely related to populations in northern Nubia than to neighboring populations in southern Egypt.
-> American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 101, Issue 2, October 1996, Pages: 237-246


When you're finishing laughing at the hilarity of it all, perhaps you can explain to us what is "endogamous ruling elite"?


What does it mean that ancient "Nuba" an "Egypt", which is to say Ta Seti and Ta Shemu consisted of and endogomous ruling elite?

I'm laughing too, because I know you don't understand the above, and moreover, I know you don't want to. [Razz]
 
Posted by Djehuti (Member # 6698) on :
 
^ Then we could all laugh together! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Doug M (Member # 7650) on :
 
Here is an interesting video of an old kingdom mastaba. Not sure which one it is and given that many mastabas have been uncovered but not published (wonder why?) there is a possibility it is one I am not familiar with:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cnYgcQ25nA
 


(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3