posted
The Naqada culture was always a political united state Werner Kaiser (Kaiser 1990) remarks besides other things that Egypt since Early Naqada III was culturally united, with only some local differences. This cultural unity might already indicate political unification. The expansion of the Naqada culture might therefore indicate the growth of an early state.
Different (city) states in Naqada I-III The following reconstruction of the political development is based on an article by Toby Wilkinson (Wilkinson 2000). The author examined the important Naqada cemeteries looking for elite tombs for each period and place. Elite tombs are defined either by size or special finds. Their occurrence is a clear sign for social differences, which might indicate that there was some ruling 'class' with their subjects, buried in smaller tombs. For Naqada I there are four cemeteries with elite tombs, (Hierakonpolis, Naqada, Hu/Diospolis Parva, This/Abydos) which might indicate four centres of power (Gebelein is badly recorded, but might have been a fifth) In mid Naqada II there are no elite tombs attested at Hu/Diospolis Parva. The place might have been conquered by the rulers from Abydos. In early Naqada III the largest elite tombs also disappear at Naqada and Gebelein seems to become less important. On the other hand there are important tombs in Nubia (Sayala, Qustul). In late Naqada III the Naqada culture is attested throughout Egypt. There are several urban centres with cemeteries and elite tombs. These places might have been capitals of small kingdoms. At this stage writing and the first names of kings appear. At the beginning of the First Dynasty Egypt is a united state, with Memphis as probably the largest urban centr, judging from the extent of the nearby cemetery fields on both sides of the Nile, at Saqqara (West Bank) and Helwan (East Bank).
posted
Nice post, Super car. Thanks for this information about the early Naqada period. In reality its really just a continuation of the Badari period.
Posts: 8675 | From: Tukuler al~Takruri as Ardo since OCT2014 | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Badari are the ancestors to the first Upper Egyptians[Southern Egyptians],and in the northern territory[Lower Egypt] you have the Merimde culture and Omari culture.
Posts: 8675 | From: Tukuler al~Takruri as Ardo since OCT2014 | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged |
"Brunton excavated in the area of Tasa some graves, which he thought might belong to a separate culture, which he called Tasian. There is no general agreement about the Tasian culture in current research. Already Baumgartel in 1955 proposed that the Tasian is a part of the Badarian culture and not a separate cultural entity (Baumgartel 1955: 20-21; compare Kaiser 1985: 71-79 (argues pro Tasa), Friedman 1999;(argues pro Tasa as nomadic culture)"-courtesy of UCL
...and possible Fayum A and Badari contact?
The similarity in tools...
Fayum A Badari (courtesy of UCL)
[This message has been edited by Super car (edited 11 February 2005).]
posted
check out the following about the Tasin culture:
The existence of still earlier culture,called the Tasins,has been claimed. This culture would have been chracterized by the pressure of round based calic form beakers with incised designs filled with white pigment,which are also known from contexts of similar date in Nelothic Sudan. However,the exisdtanece of the Tasins as a chronologically or culturally seperated unit has never been demonstrated beyond beyond doubt. Although most scholars consider the tasian to be simply part of the Badarian culture,it has also been argued that the tasian represents the continuation of Lower Egyptian tradition,which would be the immediate predessor of the Naquda 1 culture. This however,seems rather implausible ,first because similarities with the neolithic cultures are no convincing,and,secondly,because of the tasins obvious ceramic links with the sudan. If the Tasians must be considered as a specific cultural entity,then it might represent a nomadic culture with a Sudanese background,which interacted with the badarian culture page 40
Ian Shaw
Oxford History of Ancient Egypt
The Merimede probably had a Saharo-Sudanese background to:
There was probably a break in occupation between levels I and II at Merimda. Level II, known as the Mittleren Merimdekultur and considered by the by the excavator to be related to the Saharo-Sudanese cultures..." The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt Pg 38
"The Fayum Neolithic should thus be viewed as a culture at the intersection of three routes: one from the eastern Sahara, one from the Near East and one from the Nile Valley itself." The Prehistory of Egypt By Beatrix Midant-Reynes Pg. 106 =====================================================================
Here is Midant-Reynes statement on the remains of a 40 year old epipaleolithic woman from the Fayum Oasis in the same book: " The body was that of a 40 year old woman with a height of 1.6 meters, who was of a more modern racial type than the classic "Mechtoid" of the Fakhurian culture, being generally gracile, having large teeth and thick jaws bearing some resemblance to the modern "negroid' type." The Prehistory of Egypt By Beatrix Midant-Reynes Pg. 82
quote:Originally posted by ausar: check out the following about the Tasin culture:
The existence of still earlier culture,called the Tasins,has been claimed. This culture would have been chracterized by the pressure of round based calic form beakers with incised designs filled with white pigment,which are also known from contexts of similar date in Nelothic Sudan. However,the exisdtanece of the Tasins as a chronologically or culturally seperated unit has never been demonstrated beyond beyond doubt. Although most scholars consider the tasian to be simply part of the Badarian culture,it has also been argued that the tasian represents the continuation of Lower Egyptian tradition,which would be the immediate predessor of the Naquda 1 culture. This however,seems rather implausible ,first because similarities with the neolithic cultures are no convincing,and,secondly,because of the tasins obvious ceramic links with the sudan. If the Tasians must be considered as a specific cultural entity,then it might represent a nomadic culture with a Sudanese background,which interacted with the badarian culture page 40
Ian Shaw
Oxford History of Ancient Egypt
The Merimede probably had a Saharo-Sudanese background to:
There was probably a break in occupation between levels I and II at Merimda. Level II, known as the Mittleren Merimdekultur and considered by the by the excavator to be related to the Saharo-Sudanese cultures..." The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt Pg 38
"The Fayum Neolithic should thus be viewed as a culture at the intersection of three routes: one from the eastern Sahara, one from the Near East and one from the Nile Valley itself." The Prehistory of Egypt By Beatrix Midant-Reynes Pg. 106 =====================================================================
Here is Midant-Reynes statement on the remains of a 40 year old epipaleolithic woman from the Fayum Oasis in the same book: " The body was that of a 40 year old woman with a height of 1.6 meters, who was of a more modern racial type than the classic "Mechtoid" of the Fakhurian culture, being generally gracile, having large teeth and thick jaws bearing some resemblance to the modern "negroid' type." The Prehistory of Egypt By Beatrix Midant-Reynes Pg. 82
I recommend that you check out Beatrix Midant-Reynes's book entitled The Prehistory of Egypt
Very good book.
I really have to laugh sometimes at reading the wst discourse which year by year moves ever closer to channeling Diop. Look at how the story has changed regarding the so called Tasins.
And Saharo-Sudanese(?), you mean the Sahara is not a mysteriously 'separate' entity from the Sudan-Ethiopia-Nubia? That sounds like Shomarka Kieta!
Euro-essentric(s) will note the references to the Africoid nature of prehistoric Nile Valley skeletal remains, then retreat into brain-lock babblement about no Black Africans in East Africa until the (irrelevant) Bantu expansion - ignorance as rhetorical tactic.
Of course Diop will never receive due credit but by 2010 I fully expect chapter 1 of the Oxford History of Egypt to be titled: The African Origin of Egyptian Civilisation.