...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
(European) AMH affinities
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Faheemdunkers: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: Tropical when used in reference to osteological adaptations refers to temperature, not to climate, as in a 'tropical rainforest' climate. Hence, why 'tropically adapted' is the mirror opposite of 'cold adapted'. Read a book, dumb phuckin' moron.[/QUOTE]In biological literature, "tropical" only refers to humid heat environments. Those inhabitants of deserts are not tropically adapted - they are the opposite and elongnated to increase sweating which in humid climate is non-effective. Where I have sometimes used "tropical" I have employed the putative Afrocentric definition while debating Afronuts. It was only since this thread started a debate on the real definition, I provided it. [QUOTE]LMAO. If not West and Central Africans, who are the Negroids whom you described earlier as tropically adapted, with Khoisan in between, and whites below? [/QUOTE]Kafrids, Nilotids (e.g. Hiernaux's "elongnated Africans"). Yet they aren't tropically adapted, they are adapted to dry heat. [QUOTE]LMAO. You're talking out of your ass. as usual. Again, you're undermining your own claims, which you fail to pick up on due to your mental retardation. Without the slightest measure of inner conflict, you've claimed on the one hand that only hot-humid climates feature tropically adapted humans, and on the other hand you cite Raxter saying that Circum-Mediterraneans aquired tropically adapted limbs in Egypt, which, BTW, has a DESERT climate.[/QUOTE][b]Only in this thread[/b] has the climatic definition of tropical been raised where I have exposed how the Afrocentric definition is false. Elsewhere I just went along with the Afronut definition as this question of its proper use in biological literature was never raised, since it now was - I have provided the real definition. [QUOTE]Explain this data, lying ass pig. If 'Afronuts' are unjustly claiming that 'Ethiopids' are tropically adapted, explain why your 'Ethiopids' are even more tropically adapted than Ancient Egypto-Nubians, according to your girl Raxter: [i]Sudanese and Ethiopians (the modern groups geographically closest to ancient Egyptians and Nubians) assessed in the present study generally [b]plot closer to other tropical groups, possessing narrower body breadths, greater SA/BM, less mass relative to stature, and narrower body breadths relative to stature (Figures 23-26), translating into more linear body plans for Sudanese and Ethiopians compared to early Northeast African groups.[/b][/i] [/QUOTE]I've never read that paper. I merely quoted from Hamiticforums, and another forum thread which is entitled "refuting Zaharan's tropical africans" or something similar. These papers don't interest me. [QUOTE]Data fabricating, lying ass pig.[/QUOTE]That would be you idiot. (a) You've been exposed disorting the literature of Coon (b) and now how you use a false definition of "tropical". [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3