...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Of course there were 'Horner' pharaohs
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Troll Patrol # Ish Gebor: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Akachi: [qb] http://mathildasanthropologyblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/causkull.gif [IMG]http://mathildasanthropologyblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/causkull.gif[/IMG] Flat face East African type>>>"Caucasoid" http://mathildasanthropologyblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/negskull.gif [IMG]http://mathildasanthropologyblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/negskull.gif[/IMG] Nutter (1958) noted affinities between [b]the Badarian and Naqada samples, a feature that Strouhal (1971) attributed to their skulls possessing “Negroid” traits.[/b] Keita (1992), using craniometrics, discovered that the Badarian series is distinctly different from the later Egyptian series, a conclusion that is mostly confirmed here. [b]In the current analysis, the Badari sample more closely clusters with the Naqada sample and the Kerma sample.[/b] However, it also groups with the later pooled sample from Dynasties XVIII–XXV. -- Godde K. (2009) An Examination of Nubian and Egyptian biological distances: Support for biological diffusion or in situ development? Homo. 2009;60(5):389-404. The Pre-Dynatic Egyptians were found to be Negroid...and had closest affinities to the Negroid Nubians. This Negroid affinity suddenly ceases around the Late period, as this study states that Late Dynastic Egyptians were a different group of Africans than the Pre-Dynastic and even those of the 18th Dynasty (New Kingdom). It somehow means something else...anything else...why because you are double agent sent here to obfuscate our history and identity as a proud people. You are trying to make us feel embarrassed about our distinct identity hence why you and the double agents on this board have for decades obscured our distinct identity as a people under the guise of "Africanity" (the we are all one bullshit). Take that **** on...bitch! [/qb][/QUOTE][IMG]http://picturestack.com/295/823/y7ZSchermafbeIK4.png[/IMG] [QUOTE]"...Wiercinski (1965) noted an increase in the "African" (Negroid) element in crania recovered from the early dynastic tombs of Abydos as compared to the previous period. His taxonomy, like others, seems to have a narrow conception the of the range of real "African" variability. In general, this restricted view presents all tropical Africans with narrow noses and faces as being related to or descended from an external, ultimately non-African peoples. However, narrow-faced, narrow-nosed populations have long been resident in Saharo-tropical Africa (Gabel 1966; Hiernaux 1975; Rightmire 1975; Schepartz 1987) and their origin need not be sought elsewhere. These traits are also indigenous. The variability in tropical Africa is expectedly naturally high. Given their longstanding presence, narrow noses and faces cannot be deemed "non-African"..." [/QUOTE]--Keita http://youtu.be/qErhFiCvyKE [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3