...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Of course there were 'Horner' pharaohs
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Akachi: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [qb] I see you deliberately avoided posting pictures of the mummies of whom you claim that they have the "closest affinities towards the E1b1a carriers of Sub Saharan Africa". Is there any specific reason for this, other than the fact that blast your fairytales to smithereens? [/qb][/QUOTE]Now why would I need to that for? The late 17th and 18th dynasty royal mummies display the strongest "Nubian" affinities. The difference between late 17th and 18th dynasty royal mummies and contemporary Nubians is slight. In summation, the New Kingdom Pharaohs and Queens whose mummies have been recovered bear strong similarity to either contemporary Nubians,[b] or with Mesolithic-Holocene "Nubians"[/b]. Mesolithic Nubians were virtually identical to contemporary West Africans. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3