posted
During Afrocentric tirades about ancient Egypt they often cite the Y-DNA profile of modern Egyptians to either prove that the modern Egyptians are the descendants of blacks and most often cite the chart below
Then when the logical point is made that despite such high frequencies of African dna most modern Egyptians are distinct in phenotype from blacks to the south. The Afronuts then resort to Y-DNA charts that prove that modern Egyptians are less African and more mixed
According to the chart from Keita even modern Northern Egyptians are still mostly Africans which is in starx contrast with the charts above. Which is correct? Make your damn minds.
Sundjata Member # 13096
posted
White Nord, why not go ask specifically the individuals who make those arguments? Branding "Afrocentrists" as a monolith will not help you. You are still destined to lose every single debate you initiate on ES, which is why like a mole, you only pop your head above ground every once in a while when you think it's safe or after you've refueled your pathetic arguments by rehearsing on SF..
astenb Member # 14524
posted
All the charts are correct, the samples come from different studies in different areas DUMBASSS. Egyptians from Aswan will have different Y-DNA frequencies and phenotype from those for PORT SAID in the Sinai where that second sample was taken from.
White Nord - Note the high presence of Nilotic maker B-M60 (B2a1a) in Egypt. Now go to the Wikipedia article on Egyptian DNA or Haplgroup B and ask why it only shows 2% Haplogroup B in Egypt?
B2a1a @ 28% found in Northern Egyptians here too.
Why are dishonest Euroclown White nord people like you vandalizing articles to remove pertinent details on a populations connection to their southern neighbors? If you cant defeat it you deleted it.
zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova Member # 15718
posted
^Excellent work pointng this out asteneb.. what "Nord' keeps running away from is that African 'phenotypes' can vary widely, from thin-lipped, loose-haired, narrow-nosed, dark-skinned people on mountaintops in Central Africa, to short, stocky, kinky haired Pygmies in the jungles of the same broad Central African region. And that is only Central Africa. And Nord's own charts show that Egyptians are mostly African DNA. No matter how he slices it, the cluster is still more with Africans. And modern Arabized Egypt will have a variety of Middle Eastern and Asiatic/Euro gene elements. THis is news?
Even more pathetic is 'Nord's' deletion of accurate schlolarship from Wikipedia and substitution of bogus claims and references. Thanks for exposing him. This again is wy ES is so valuable. No one has to agree with anyone here, but we put out the true scholarship and citations in full, so that any reader can see and verify for themselves, and make up their own minds. Contrast this accurate, democratic flow of information with the bogus methods of 'Nord' and his ilk on Wikipedia, including admin collaborators. Keep up the good work exposing them Astenb.
the lioness Member # 17353
posted
Are they primarily African or not ??????
I say provisionally, yes
astenb Member # 14524
posted
quote:Originally posted by the lioness:
Are they primarily African or not ??????
I say provisionally, yes
We are talking about gene frequencies not pictures dummy. Stay out of grown folks business.
Djehuti Member # 6698
posted
^ LOL and LMAO @ White Nerd being busted with his fraudulent shenanigans!
quote:Originally posted by astenb: All the charts are correct, the samples come from different studies in different *areas* DUMBASSS. Egyptians from Aswan will have different Y-DNA frequencies and phenotype from those for PORT SAID in the Sinai where that second sample was taken from.
You would think White Nerd would be smart enough to know that the modern Egyptian population is not homogeneous as if the people in rural Upper Egypt would have the same haplotype frequencies as people in coastal Alexandria!
Sundjata is right. He is like an annoying mole who retreats underground when soundly defeated only to rise again when he "thinks" he has a better sounding argument. Poor Euronut.
zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova Member # 15718
posted
^^Their standard tactic is deleting valid scholarship from WIkipedia, aided by collaborating Administrators and/or distorting references. But they still fail. THe free flow of information continues on ES, and is avaliable widely on the web, across several different websites. The disappearance of one site will not make much difference- the info is duplicated elsewhere and well indexed by Google. They think that bogus Wikipedia edits will serve as the last word of reference on the topic online. Pathetic buffoons... ultimate failures, patrolling their little pages as if they somehow mattered.
posted 
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)