Its a clickbait title, and he spouts some obvious inaccuracies, but interestingly he mentions disaproval of Ancient Egyptians being portrayed by non-Black people too, links this to the political climate, and isnt automatically trying to claim 'Arab' either (I think he says Arab once in passing, but doesnt seem to be trying to say AE' werent Black so were therefore Arab).
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
quote:Zack Galante 15 hours ago (edited) I love your videos … but im surprised u left out Strabo a Greek historian and the only person to see cleopatra & her family and he quoted "Three classes inhabited the city (Alexandria in Egypt): first the Aegyptian or native stock of people, who were quick-tempered and not inclined to civil life; and secondly the mercenary class, who were severe and numerous and intractable..; and, third, the tribe of the Alexandrians, who also were not distinctly inclined to civil life, and for the same reasons, but still they were better than those others, for even though they were a mixed people, still they were Greeks by origin and mindful of the customs common to the Greeks."
Starbo also stated that cleopatra was the only illegitimate child of Ptolemy XII Auletes.
quote:SignalHillTV 14 hours ago You are close Zach lol Strabo is reporting in the third person. He is saying the Egyptians are stating why she is ineligible to be queen and why Bernice Iv could rule. So he states he had three daughters with only Bernice Iv being legitimate and the rest of the kids, Cleopatra Vii, and Arisinoe Vi, are illegitimate, and the sons were too young to rule. They expelled Ptolemy Xii Auletes. So most scholars believe their mother/mothers were Egyptian because they could write in hieroglyphics. Then remember Alexander the Great married Roxanna. Not sure what happens to Cleopatra V she is not mentioned again after Bernice Vi's birth which was recorded. "Strabo Geography Book 1" Then Zack you can also see how they are represented in Hieroglyphics they both clearly have skin tone) Perfume Payparus. Getty Images
quote:
SignalHillTV 14 hours ago Now Zach before I go cut and paste and it will take you to the scholarly article. "From the reconstruction, Thur and her colleagues concluded that Arsinoe had an African mother (the Ptolemies were an ethnically Greek dynasty). That conclusion led to splashy headlines suggesting that Cleopatra, too, was African" everything in parentheses, now her, and Cleopatra could have had a different mother. But when you get a chance in your free time notice how they were excited when they found her remains in Esphues, and how they try to challenge and dismiss them when they said her mother was African. So think about that when you see how Cleopatra is depicted in Hieroglyphics standing next to Arisinoe because they are the same complexion.
quote:Zack Galante 14 hours ago @SignalHillTV Duane W. Roller in his book Cleopatra: A Biography, published by Oxford University Press in 2010. Roller argues that Cleopatra’s mother may have been a 2nd wife of Ptolemaios XII & that she may have been a member of the Ptolemaic royal family named Berenike & her husband Psenptais, who was an Egyptian high priest. Concluding cleopatra having a black Egyptian mother.
[QUOTE] 13 hours ago @Zack Galante Yeah Zach if I had the present a case in Crimal court I would say her mother is unknown. However in Civil court more than likely I would agree with Duane Roller that her mother was Egyptian from a Memphis priestess family. Then I would argue that she and Arisnoe VI have the same African mother. It's a reason why Bernice VI could not read or write the Egyptian language but they both could. Now Elizabeth Taylor they actually copied her look from hieroglyphics braids etc So whenever you get a chance to check out the getting images the person she is always holding hands with is Arisnoe IV. They found Arsinoe IV remains but they have not found Cleopatra Vii's (yet) maybe they never will.
2
Reply
SignalHillTV SignalHillTV 13 hours ago @Zack Galante Yeah Zack he mentions Cleopatra she is one of the three daughters. He is talking about Bernice IV it appears you are saying Bernike. The other two daughters are Arisnoe IV and Cleopatra. If I picked someone to play Cleopatra I would go with Zendaya. So if you watch the channel in Egypt the Royal Wife Cleopatra's V offspring would be eligible to rule. Children by a lesser wife could not unless they were male, so that is why is stated they were too young. So Zach people may try to stump you and state what the Greek word for illegitimate is or state what Strabo meant. But he is just reporting, the Egyptians expelled him. Once Bernice VI is executed now they are eligible to be co-regent with one of the sons./QUOTE]
Posted by Yatunde Lisa Bey (Member # 22253) on :
The importance of marrying someone from a Memphis priestess family is key...
Black priestesses from Nubia in Egyptian temples see anything from Solange Ashby...
quote:Nor do we know the identity of her mother. It has been suggested, based on Cleopatra’s ability with the Egyptian language and her devotion to the Egyptian pantheon, that she may have been a member of the family that held the hereditary priesthood of Ptah . This influential ruling family held high-level positions in ancient Egyptian cities like Memphis.
We have no securely identified portraits of her other than those found on her coins, all of which vary considerably. So any claims as to the specifics of her appearance can be safely dismissed.
As can sweeping statements regarding her identity. Cleopatra was simultaneously Macedonian, Egyptian and Roman. In the habit of emphasising different aspects of her identity to suit different audiences, she would not have considered herself either white or black, because modern concepts of race would have been unknown to her.
Saw the first episode today. It was good for the most part. The experts acknowledged the Ptolemaic dynasty's Macedonian origins while pointing out the gaps our knowledge about in Cleopatra's family tree. I did feel that too many of the actors in the dramatization spoke with British accents though.
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by BrandonP: I did feel that too many of the actors in the dramatization spoke with British accents though.
If they all spoke in American accents you would have no problem?
Posted by BrandonP (Member # 3735) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by BrandonP: I did feel that too many of the actors in the dramatization spoke with British accents though.
If they all spoke in American accents you would have no problem?
I would prefer they sounded like the cultures they represented.
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
Maybe the most authentic had been to let them speak Greek, Latin and Egyptian languages and had English sub texts.
I have noticed in some American productions certain characters talk British English, maybe as a sign of some kind of sophistication. Romans in films often talk with British accent. If they had spoken with Italian accent maybe some people would have associated it with gangster movies.
Posted by Doug M (Member # 7650) on :
I saw the promo on Netflix and they made the entire dynasty look black, including Caesarion. All of which is totally fake and shows this is nothing but propaganda, as in there were no black dynasties in ancient KMT so they need to make one up using the Greeks. Its a complete farce and shows they have no intent or desire to show the actual indigenous dynasties as black, like the Middle Kingdom, New Kingdom and so forth, otherwise they would have just done it. And when was the last time these Afro British actually did anything based on their own roots in Africa?
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
Heather Basten is an English casting director based in London. She is known for her work with A24, Blumhouse, Film4, Amazon Studios, BBC and more. She has been recognised as a Screen International 'Star of Tomorrow', a BAFTA Breakthrough Artist, and a CSA Artios & CDG Nominee. Her most notable work includes "Dreaming Whilst Black", the first UK TV series from A24. Other recent works include BIFA-winning stone age film "The Origin"; the sophomore feature from UK producer Oliver Kassman (Saint Maud), and the US feature "House of Spoils" for Amazon Studios & Blumhouse.
Black American actors slighted as Brits nab roles: 'We can't tell our own stories?'
Samuel L Jackson’s critique of black British actors taking US roles has sparked a heated debate in Hollywood where African American performers said the hiring of UK talent is another form of industry discrimination they face on a regular basis...
When justifying the choice of hiring a British actor over an American, casting directors and film-makers sometimes cite the prestigious training in the UK at elite schools like the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art.
In an interview with the Observer, Peele (Get Out director) said he wanted to hire an American but was so blown away by Kaluuya: “At the end of the day, he was the best person for the role. He did the audition and it was a slam dunk.”
In 2013, Spike Lee told the Guardian he wasn’t bothered by the trend of British actors taking American roles: “They’re well-trained. They came through on the stage not on a music video or whatever. So their acting’s impeccable and then they go into films.”
In addition it's also often cheaper to hire British actors and in some instances the UK government offers financial incentives to do it There will not be much publicity around these cost factors
Posted by Firewall (Member # 20331) on :
I finished the Cleopatra docuseries today. It was a good series with a nice balance of expert commentary and historical dramatizations. I still stand by the actors' British accents being a little distracting though.
BTW, the first episode of the series states that the Egyptians of Cleopatra's time would have ranged in color from pale to dark brown, which as we all know is true of Egyptians today, so it isn't even like they're trying to divorce modern Egyptians from their Ptolemaic-era ancestors like a lot of the haters have claimed.
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
Egyptian girl Nora tells about some of the hostile reactions she got for criticizing Netflix Cleopatra series
Cleopatras dynasty lived in Egypt for about 300 years so in a way it has become a part of Egyptian history. But she is not a part of American history, or should be a part of American racial agenda.
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
she trying to attention and social media views. If she was Greek she would at least have some footing to complain Her Tik Tok subheading is "Mentally unstable but cute" https://www.tiktok.com/@noraelzeiny Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
Without a DNA test we have no idea if she has some Greek DNA, or ancient Egyptian DNA or other DNA, she lives in a country where many peoples have lived, so they are all a part of her history, but not the history of most Americans.
And some of the reactions she got on social media are really crazy and insulting. But I recognize those reactions, I have seen similar reactions when Native Americans have stated online that the ancient Olmecs were not black.
Posted by Doug M (Member # 7650) on :
Nora and many other Egyptians are pushing the idea that there was no distinction between the Ptolemies and the native population of the Nile. The Ptolemies were Greek and not like the average population along the Nile. It is part of this myth of the ancient Nile being a "mediterranean" population as if there was no distinction between Levantines, Nile Valley groups and Greeks. All of those populations are not the same even if they were along the Mediterranean.
But even more important, it goes against the bigger historical issue which is the Greeks appropriated the culture of the Nile and claimed it as their own. Not to mention that the Greeks promoted Greek as the lingua franca of the elites, scholarship and trade, which began the process of the death of MDU NTR. Which led to the language going extinct under the Romans. Yet these people are holding these Greeks and Romans as somehow the same as the indigenous populations because they want to pretend nothing has changed in all that time. As if the populations of the old kingdom were no different from the populations of the Ptolemaic dynasty and no different than the populations in Egypt today as all 'mediterranean'.
Posted by Yatunde Lisa Bey (Member # 22253) on :
quote:Originally posted by BrandonP: I finished the Cleopatra docuseries today. It was a good series with a nice balance of expert commentary and historical dramatizations. I still stand by the actors' British accents being a little distracting though.
BTW, the first episode of the series states that the Egyptians of Cleopatra's time would have ranged in color from pale to dark brown, which as we all know is true of Egyptians today, so it isn't even like they're trying to divorce modern Egyptians from their Ptolemaic-era ancestors like a lot of the haters have claimed.
Yes it was actually very good, and a lot of bruhaha over nothing.
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
Seems like the word war between Netflix (and those who support the Netflix show) and many Egyptians (and others) has become quite intense. Adele James has also received a lot of hate on social media. Here are some reactions on her Twitter after one of her comments
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx: It seems though that some Egyptians had a horn in the side of "Afrocentrists" also before Netflix Cleopatra film.
Here is an Egyptian guy who talks about Afrocentrism (mostly in its American form)
If you test with different testing companies you are likely to get different results
These companies interpret their data and label it and they have sample different data for comparison
Here they say he's about 60% Middle Eastern yet also say his closet ancestors is Ancient Egyptian. One would have to go into an in-depth analysis of their methodology to judge this
In their color code on the map they classify Egypt as green "Middle Eastern" and classify the Maghreb excluding Egypt as "North African" I suspect 23nadMe does not classify this way currently
I am also suspicious of the was these private testing companies do things. If they observe that most modern Egyptian want to be seen as related to dynastic Egyptians they may suggest that in the results to satisfy the customer
This man might have some percentage of Dynastic Egyptian ancestry but I am not convinced these companies currently have the ability to determine that
He seems most surprised that it says he is 4.9% Japanese/ Korean
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
the average American, if having no knowledge about her would probably say she is either black, black-hispanic or "mixed"
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
^^ Obviously someone in her comments thought she was a Filipina
Here in my place people would probably called her Arab or Middle Eastern
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
Seems there is a whole ongoing campaign on YouTube and TikTok where young Egyptians scold American Afrocentrists
Seems the Netflix documentary has awaken a lot of resentment
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx: ^^ Obviously someone in her comments thought she was a Filipina
Here in my place people would probably called her Arab or Middle Eastern
In many places in America there are few Arabs and many dress like other Americans so it's not clear what the ancestry of people walking around on the street is exactly.
She resembles Arabs and ancient Egyptians in my view. The large size of her eyes, even disregarding the makeup, look like some of the Egyptian art
Posted by Yatunde Lisa Bey (Member # 22253) on :
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx: Seems there is a whole ongoing campaign on YouTube and TikTok where young Egyptians scold American Afrocentrists
Seems the Netflix documentary has awaken a lot of resentment
They should be embarrassed by their OVER REACTION. But, their OVER REACTION is revealing their anti blackness... the majority of the cast looked like average Egyptians and the priests were historically accurate
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
Posted by Doug M (Member # 7650) on :
Basically this show is designed to give the racists online a big old target to attack without obviously looking racist. Again, if these people REALLY wanted to tell the story of a black ancient Nile Valley they would have done one using the indigenous black dynasties from long before the Greeks. But obviously the implication here is that they needed white scholars and executives to support this and it is highly unlikely that a white scholar would come out in public support of black dynasties in the old, middle or new kingdom. So they play this game of giving some vague support for the possibility of some black ancestry for Cleopatra but in reality it is nowhere near what this show is portraying. If Cleopatras mother was already mixed, then there is no way she or any of the other main characters would be as black as they are depicted in the show.
But the only reason the scholars and everybody else is OK with this is because they know full well it makes the argument around a black ancient Nile Valley a debate over Cleopatra. Because the weight of evidence goes against any conclusion she was black and they know it. And they don't want to support a black indigenous dynasty so they decided to allow this because they know it will draw racist hatred because it is based on limited evidence, half truths and nonsense. And it tells the entire world that "black people", "black scholars" and "afrocentrics" all believe this as if Cleopatra and her ancestry is the cornerstone of the actual issue of whether the ancient Nile Valley was black. And while they try to promote how they stand against racism in the telling of history, they themselves are showing their racism by not similarly standing behind a show about a black Queen like Ahmose Nefertari because almost no white scholar will come out and say that she was black. It allows white scholars to pretend to be liberals who support the idea of blacks in the ancient Nile Valley by just acknowledging the possibility of black ancestry without definite proof.But that is without actually having to go on the record and say that any of the great Kings or Queens of the ancient Nile in the Old, Middle or New Kingdom were black where the evidence is more obvious and solid. This is no accident because they know full well their job is to avoid doing that as much as humanly possible.
It is no different than how they deliberately write these DNA papers to suggest things that are supportive of the Eurocentric trolls online who constantly regurgitate these papers in debates over ancient North Africa. All of this is deliberate and willful propaganda and nothing else. And the crux of the propaganda is promoting the idea that "afrocentrics" from America are the main ones promoting that the ancient Nile Valley was black. This is knowing full well that many historical white scholars have also supported this and that many black scholars who also support this are not "afrocentrics". And there were no "afrocentrics" in the Cleopatra documentary, including Jada Pinkett and the woman talking of her grandmother saying Cleopatra was black.
You have to know that Egyptology as a discipline primarily has a set of talking points that it teaches to all students. And those talking points are very well defined to promote this idea of a non black African ancient Nile valley. It starts with things like the same cherry picked images being used over and over, such as Rahotep and Nofret, to the idea that KMT means black soil and the idea that nubians were the only "true blacks" of the ancient NIle Valley. Most of this deliberate campaign of misinformation is based on omitting all substantial evidence to the contrary which any student of Egyptology knows full well. But they cannot go off the "script" of what Egyptology promotes as part of its public face. That means omitting large swaths of writings, art, tombs and so forth in order to focus only on those that are defined as part of the doctrine. So the Nefertiti Bust always gets promoted while Amenhotep III's tomb does not. Talk of war against and images of so-called Nubian captives gets promotes while the Prophecy of Neferti and numerous high officials named Nehesy do not. And above all else, Cleopatra is almost always included, while Ahmose Nefertari and Queen Nodmet are not. And of course DNA studies on certain anonymous later period mummies in the North gets published but already existing DNA from various royals and others does not.
And this is why they have to attack African scholarship because they are not obliged to follow that script.
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
I wonder if they will make any documentary of Amanirenas. If they did they could avoid a lot of criticism, they could show an admittedly "Black" Nile Valley queen and they could avoid the eternal question about the skin color of the Old, Middle or New Kingdom Egyptians. And on top of that it would be an exciting story, new to much of the audience instead of the story of Cleopatra which has been filmed countless of times, and with countless of documentaries and books about her.
Shall be interesting to see if Netflix makes more documentaries in the African queens series or if the backlash makes them drop the series.
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
Nora has posted another short video about Afrocentrism
Thank goodness for the existence of youtube, on there I can watch Egyptian news and tv shows, Eritrean news and TV shows. On both you will find a range of phenotypes.
Neither woman's phenotype is singular to their respective countries
Posted by Yatunde Lisa Bey (Member # 22253) on :
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx: Nora has posted another short video about Afrocentrism
Afrocentrism is NOT a coping mechanism. It has a 150 year history in the US & Caribbean. Some people are really racist and under educated which is a sin in a world where there is google.
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
I see that the man in Noras video holds up this book
Clarence E Walker, 2001: We Can't Go Home Again: An Argument About Afrocentrism
On Amazon it is presented like this:
quote:Afrocentrism has been a controversial but popular movement in schools and universities across America, as well as in black communities. But in We Can't Go Home Again, historian Clarence E. Walker puts Afrocentrism to the acid test, in a thoughtful, passionate, and often blisteringly funny analysis that melts away the pretensions of this "therapeutic mythology." As expounded by Molefi Kete Asante, Yosef Ben-Jochannan, and others, Afrocentrism encourages black Americans to discard their recent history, with its inescapable white presence, and to embrace instead an empowering vision of their African (specifically Egyptian) ancestors as the source of western civilization. Walker marshals a phalanx of serious scholarship to rout these ideas. He shows, for instance, that ancient Egyptian society was not black but a melange of ethnic groups, and questions whether, in any case, the pharaonic regime offers a model for blacks today, asking "if everybody was a King, who built the pyramids?" But for Walker, Afrocentrism is more than simply bad history--it substitutes a feel-good myth of the past for an attempt to grapple with the problems that still confront blacks in a racist society. The modern American black identity is the product of centuries of real history, as Africans and their descendants created new, hybrid cultures--mixing many African ethnic influences with native and European elements. Afrocentrism replaces this complex history with a dubious claim to distant glory. "Afrocentrism offers not an empowering understanding of black Americans' past," Walker concludes, "but a pastiche of 'alien traditions' held together by simplistic fantasies." More to the point, this specious history denies to black Americans the dignity, and power, that springs from an honest understanding of their real history.
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx: I wonder if they will make any documentary of Amanirenas. If they did they could avoid a lot of criticism, they could show an admittedly "Black" Nile Valley queen and they could avoid the eternal question about the skin color of the Old, Middle or New Kingdom Egyptians. And on top of that it would be an exciting story, new to much of the audience instead of the story of Cleopatra which has been filmed countless of times, and with countless of documentaries and books about her.
Shall be interesting to see if Netflix makes more documentaries in the African queens series or if the backlash makes them drop the series.
If the series gets dropped it is because it is garbage. And actually, given the quality of the series so far, it probably is best they dont do any more. If they wanted to tell the truth of black history on the Nile, they would have started at the beginning. Using racism as an excuse means they are simply promoting racism in denying the facts. There is far more evidence of black rulers in all dynasties going back to the beginning of KMT than there is for Cleopatra. So obviously they aren't serious about wanting to tell 'hidden' black history.
The main reason the Kandakes would make a good historical series is that most Queens in the NIle Valley were not warrior Queens, including Hatshepsut. So they are very unique in that regard.
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
A review on TikTok of the first episode of the series. The reviewer was not impressed
Let’s Just Call The Outrage Around Queen Cleopatra What It Is: Racism BY SAGAL MOHAMMED
quote:Cleopatra’s race has long been regarded as ambiguous by scholars and historians. What we do know is that her father, Ptolemy XII, was of Macedonian-Greek descent, a member of the family that conquered Egypt more than 200 years before Cleopatra’s birth in 69 BC. Her mother’s identity, on the other hand, is unknown – although she may well have been Egyptian – which is where things get a little more complex. “Cleopatra ruled in Egypt long before the Arab settlement in North Africa,” said Dr Sally Ann Ashton, a research scientist and author of Cleopatra and Egypt, who appears in the documentary. “If the maternal side of her family were indigenous women, they would’ve been African, and this should be reflected in contemporary representations of Cleopatra.”
To be clear, the docu-drama isn’t, in fact, arguing that Cleopatra was a dark-skinned Black woman with no Macedonian-Greek heritage at all, although the media storm around it might make you assume otherwise. Rather, its creators, including scholar Shelley Haley, professor of classics and African studies at Hamilton College, have asked us to imagine her as a woman of mixed heritage, hence the casting of a biracial actress. “Her ethnicity is not the focus of Queen Cleopatra, but we did intentionally decide to depict her of mixed ethnicity to reflect theories about Cleopatra’s possible Egyptian ancestry and the multicultural nature of ancient Egypt,” a statement from Netflix reads.
An interesting article about why many Egyptians dislike the Netflix Cleopatra. The article gives a background. It explains the historical roots of the conflict.
A couple of excerpts. Reading the whole article is recommended:
quote:Why Netflix’s ‘Queen Cleopatra’ Has Egypt up in Arms
Western leaders and filmmakers have long denied the link between modern Egypt and its ancient heritage. --- Most Egyptians’ objections to the show and the primary reason for frustration in Egypt is not due to racism and is not about Adele James’s being Black, per se. It is about the decision by the makers of the show to challenge historic anti-Black racism in the United States through revisionism of another racialized people’s own history without caring about how these people might react. --- Ending the marginalization of Black and other minority actors on the screen is long overdue; and recognizing the roles of Black protagonists in history is important and much needed. But doing this at the expense of another nonwhite people victimized by Western colonialism and imperialism—and showing a lack of respect or understanding for this people’s demand to be recognized as the owners of their own history—is misguided and counterproductive. If the intention of Queen Cleopatra’s makers was to reverse decades of racism on the screen, what they ended up achieving is a perpetuation of this very racism.
Why Netflix’s ‘Queen Cleopatra’ Has Egypt up in Arms Foreign policy, MAY 14, 2023 Link to the article
By Sara Khorshid, a doctoral candidate at Western University in Canada.
Posted by Yatunde Lisa Bey (Member # 22253) on :
So these people are another non white group? I think the NAAN/MENA's did to take a deep dive into that sentence....
North African Arab nationalist are out here showing their racist arses
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
There is a lot of talk on the low rating Of Queen Cleopatra on Rotten Tomatoes:
Baseera conducts survey of Egyptian opinions on Netflix’s ‘Queen Cleopatra’ Independent Egypt Independent May 15, 2023 .
Regarding the nomination of an actress of African origin to portray Queen Cleopatra, 24 percent believe that the choice is a falsification of history
31 percent believe that the series makers have the right to present a different vision,
and 45 percent said that they could not decide.
The percentage of those who believe the series falsifies history is 18 percent among those with less than average education, rising sharply to 43 percent among those with a university education.
This stands in contrast to the percentage of those who answered that they cannot determine, which decreases from 57 percent among those with less than average education to 25 percent among those with a university education or higher degrees.
The percentage of those who believe that the makers of the series have the right to present a different vision was 36 percent among youth in the 18-29 age group, compared to about 26 percent among those who have reached 50 years old or above.
Among subscribers of Netflix, the percentage of those who see this choice as falsifying history is 40 percent, compared to 43 percent who believe that the creators of the series have the right to present a different vision.
Seventeen percent answered that they cannot decide.
The survey was conducted using landline and mobile phones on a potential sample of 1,560 citizens in the age group of 18 years old and above, covering all governorates of Egypt.
The interviews took place from May 1-4. The response rate was about 42 percent and the margin of error in the results is less than three percent.
The survey was conducted with self-financing from the Baseera Center.
____________________________
However I don't see the poll on the Baseera Center site:
The Egyptian Center for Public Opinion Research (Baseera)
Egyptian archaeologist Zahi Hawass said that during one of his lectures in Los Angeles he was protested by people objecting to his refusal to consider Cleopatra being black. They carried banners with slogans against him, he said, adding that they had fallen for false information.
During a phone interview with “Hadith al-Qahira” (Cairo Talk) talk show on the “al-Qahira wal Nas” (Cairo and the People) channel, Hawass stressed “We are not against blacks, and if the same situation happened with the continent of Asia, I would object to them.”
He emphasized that Cleopatra was burgundy in color, and not dark-skinned, and this a fallacy bought into by African Americans. “The paintings on the walls of temples confirm that the kings are not black,” he explained.
“African-Americans have entered a fallacy, they are a minority and raise these lies in order for the world to say that the Egyptian civilization is a black civilization, but our film answered them strongly.”
Hawass added that ancient Egypt’s history is strongly established and these historical lies will have no impact on it.
Link to article Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
^^ I saw a posting about that 6 days ago but see no video. How could there be no video on that?
Posted by Doug M (Member # 7650) on :
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx: Seems Zahi Hawass was met by protesters in USA
Egyptian archaeologist Zahi Hawass said that during one of his lectures in Los Angeles he was protested by people objecting to his refusal to consider Cleopatra being black. They carried banners with slogans against him, he said, adding that they had fallen for false information.
During a phone interview with “Hadith al-Qahira” (Cairo Talk) talk show on the “al-Qahira wal Nas” (Cairo and the People) channel, Hawass stressed “We are not against blacks, and if the same situation happened with the continent of Asia, I would object to them.”
He emphasized that Cleopatra was burgundy in color, and not dark-skinned, and this a fallacy bought into by African Americans. “The paintings on the walls of temples confirm that the kings are not black,” he explained.
“African-Americans have entered a fallacy, they are a minority and raise these lies in order for the world to say that the Egyptian civilization is a black civilization, but our film answered them strongly.”
Hawass added that ancient Egypt’s history is strongly established and these historical lies will have no impact on it.
Because it likely never happened at least nowhere near the scale as those protests of the King Tut exhibition where they displayed that reconstruction of a white king tut. And I wouldn't put it past them to try and play up this "debate" as some kind of proxy to pigeonhole all discussions of black ancient Nile Valley origins into a debate over cleopatra. Because that is something they know they have better chances winning than one on the actual ancient Nile Valley indigenous culture and people.
People in the Egyptology "establishment" know full well they cannot win a direct debate on facts from the Nile Valley. That is why it is almost like both sides, Netflix and Egyptology, purposely promoted this series as a giant strawman argument for a black Egypt. Again Cleopatra was not "Egyptian" ethnically, she was Greek and most of her lineage was Greek aside from maybe her mother or grandmother, but that doesn't make them dark skinned blacks either. So it is an attempt to use this series to "represent" the arguments of Afrocentrics, of which none were present on the program. No African scholars put forward any support for a black Cleopatra in this series, as opposed to various white scholars. Yet he isn't attacking them. He is attacking unnamed anonymous "Afrocentrics" when Jada Pickett Smith is no African scholar and definitely not Afrocentic and neither is the actress playing Cleopatra.
But it is this kind of behavior that reflects the same kind of mentality seen online where trolls will pick the most absurd claims they can find to use as the basis for their "non black" ancient Nile Valley and to discredit African scholarship. And this kind of behavior is fully supported by the establishment, who will never ever publicly come out and defend themselves against many of the points made by white scholars but also various African scholars and others online. Ironically enough these same scholars hide behind "documentaries" produced by western television channels showing all white or eurasian ancient Nile Valley Africans, with the same scripted talking points that have been rehashed and rehearsed for over 100 years. They will never have an open discussion in a public forum where facts and evidence can be presented and addressed directly. Because they know it is all a house of cards and a carefully crafted facade of deliberate falsehoods.
And again, these Hollywood movie studios love Cleopatra because it is a romantic image of the "roots" of Western civilization as a colonial society. But that romantic image totally downplays the fact that the Greeks admired the ancient Nile and acknowledged the Nile as the origin of much of their culture.
Notice that this video produced by a notorious fraud Curtis Ryan Woodide, is supported by Zahi Hawass and other "establishment" Egyptologists. And in it they claim that ancient Egypt was "multiracial" and "multicultural" which not ironically is the same thing the producers of the Netflix documentary also said.
This same Curtis Ryan Woodside is also supported by Odyssey - Ancient History Documentaries on Youtube. One famous example of Curtis Ryan Woodside and his "white washing" of ancient pharaohs fully supported and promoted by the establishment: https://youtu.be/URwdcKBVWEE?t=1497
So all of these people are actually coming from the same place even though they appear to be against each other because neither one wants to address the facts of ancient Nile Valley origins as black African. To me this just looks like to frauds or con men trying to defend their respective hustles by pretending to fight when they both are promoting falsehoods. On one side you got fake white liberals (with some confused black wanna be liberals) trying to control black images and identity in the media including fake black history while on the other you got Egyptology and its historical lies and falsehoods about a non black ancient Nile Valley. It is both hilarious and sad at the same time.
Various references on the Nile Valley influence on Greek art and culture and why they admired and preserved it under the Ptolemies.
"As a historian philosopher I give her our total support" ~Molefi Asante on Jada Pinkett Smith
.
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
Talking about John Henrik Clarke: Here is an interesting, and intense discussion from 1996:
quote: Legendary discussion between Dr. John Henrik Clarke, Dr. Martin Gardiner Bernal (Black Athena), Professor Mary Lefkowitz (Not Out Of Africa) and Guy MacLean Rogers (Black Athena Revisited), moderated by Utrice Leid, They debate the Origins and Foundations of Western Civilization. Does Africa, Asia or Ancient Greece supply the foundation of the world we live in today?
One can think though that the leader of the debate Utrice Leid, was not totally neutral, she sometimes seemed a bit hostile against Mary Lefkowitz and Rogers. But she did not so much criticize Bernal or Clarke. Maybe it would have been better with a more neutral moderator.
Another one of many articles that float around about Netflix Cleopatra, and the reception of the series
quote:Was Cleopatra Black? We’re asking the wrong question.
Washington Post May 12, 2023
Experts say critics of the Netflix docudrama’s Cleopatra are anachronistically applying modern racial constructs to an ancient civilization
When it comes to Cleopatra, the enigmatic ruler whose political savvy — and romantic entanglements — have made her an endless source of fascination, Hollywood has never gotten it right.
Elizabeth Taylor’s 1963 portrayal — for which she donned a braided wig and winged eyeliner — is as iconic as it was flawed. Angelina Jolie’s potential casting in a long rumored but yet to be filmed biopic was met with backlash in 2019, as were subsequent rumors that Israeli actress Gal Gadot would take on the role. The consensus? Cleopatra, Queen of the Nile (as in Egypt, as in Africa), didn’t look like any of them.
But when Netflix introduced Adele James, who is Black and biracial, as the ancient Egyptian monarch in a trailer for the docudrama “Queen Cleopatra,” the criticism was particularly ardent. More like: Cleopatra definitely didn’t look like that.
In the end of his documentary about Cleopatra Curtis Ryan Woodside writes this:
quote: Whenever I make an Egyptology documentary the first thing I do is ask if my friends in Egypt are happy and proud of the production, that is the most important point when discussing the history and heritage of a country
Maybe Jada Pinkett Smith should have thought of that as well. Maybe some of the controversy with the Egyptians could have been avoided.
Posted by Doug M (Member # 7650) on :
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx: In the end of his documentary about Cleopatra Curtis Ryan Woodside writes this:
quote: Whenever I make an Egyptology documentary the first thing I do is ask if my friends in Egypt are happy and proud of the production, that is the most important point when discussing the history and heritage of a country
Maybe Jada Pinkett Smith should have thought of that as well. Maybe some of the controversy with the Egyptians could have been avoided.
Most of his videos are distortions as in the Nefertiti's daughters video I linked. And given Hawass' support for his channel I assume that means they "establishment" likes white washing ancient Nile Valley Africans. Being from Egypt doesn't mean that you are above promoting fake history and Zahi Hawass is proof of that. That doesn't make their arguments or his videos any more legitimate. The problem is the Netflix production deliberately stooped to the level of feelings and emotional sentiment and not facts, which should not be part of any kind of scholarship.
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx:
Maybe Jada Pinkett Smith should have thought of that as well. Maybe some of the controversy with the Egyptians could have been avoided.
This was calculated to create a controversy
quote:Originally posted by Doug M:
quote: Director Tina Gharavi has defended the casting for the docuseries stating "Doing the research, I realized what a political act it would be to see Cleopatra portrayed by a Black actress".
quote:
'Why shouldn't Cleopatra be a melanated sister?' ~ director Tina Gharavi
One could argue this is a test of "Black Power" It doesn't have to accurate, that even it is not that the point is white people can't stop black people from playing anybody they want to
However other people can do the same and history can become revised as a political race war, satisfying those who argue "everything is political and "you are either for us or you are against us" This has been brewing in forums and on youtube for years
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
This has been brewing in forums and on youtube for years
Yes, Netflix Cleopatra has made the conflicts more visible also for a broader public.
One can wonder what ramifications this will have for African American scholars who want to work in Egypt? And also for entertainers like Kevin Hart? Will the gates close?
Posted by Doug M (Member # 7650) on :
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx:
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
This has been brewing in forums and on youtube for years
Yes, Netflix Cleopatra has made the conflicts more visible also for a broader public.
One can wonder what ramifications this will have for African American scholars who want to work in Egypt? And also for entertainers like Kevin Hart? Will the gates close?
Zahi Hawass and the Egyptian SCA has been involved in numerous documentaries produced by western television studios all featuring outright lies and whitewashing of the ancient Nile Valley. This is the actual problem, not Netflix because Netflix is an entertainment company, while Egyptology, Zahi Hawass and the SCA are institutions in control of the history of the ancient Nile Valley. And if they are distorting and promoting fake history, it is a much bigger issue. But their outrage is nothing more than hypocrisy as they have been doing it for a long time.
Neflix as a white company did this on purpose to promote the image of black African history on the Nile as basically feel good fiction. Again it is a hustle. White media is playing the ultimate race hustle on black people by giving themselves agency on black representation in the media. Meanwhile, actual black scholars and serious African scholarship and history is being put on the back burner. And of course most of these actors and so-called black "activists" are in it for a paycheck. Because truth be told, if African people really wanted to make a story about the ancient history of the Nile they could certainly do it. And they don't need Egypt's permission to do it because Egypt does not control the history of the ancient Nile or Africa in general. The modern country of Egypt has only existed since 1971. And the first president of this country was Anwar Sadat, a black African. For most of the time prior to that, the country was basically a province of the Ottoman Empire and the Muhammad Ali dynasty. They don't even have their modern history straight let alone the ancient history.
Basically modern Egypt as most populous country on the African continent is very poor. And the reason for that is in a large part due to the prior rulers of the country basically plundering it for its wealth and using the citizens as peasants. And this is what weakened the country and made it vulnerable to the invasions of Europeans. Part of that plunder included allowing Europeans to cart off large numbers of artifacts back to Europe and using the population to build the Suez Canal for little pay. All of this led up to the later revolutions in the country which established the new Arab republics, from which the modern country emerged.
quote:Originally posted by Doug M: And they don't need Egypt's permission to do it because Egypt does not control the history of the ancient Nile or Africa in general.
But the Egyptians could in some case hinder certain scholars, that they see as too Afrocentric, to work in Egypt itself, so these scholars loose access to primary material in the form of tombs, ancient buildings and other monuments. They could maybe make it harder for "Afrocentric" archaeologists to participate in digs in Egypt and so on.
But perhaps this storm is a phenomena that will pass by rather quickly, and things will soon be calm again.
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
As mentioned earlier, Egyptians plan to make their own Cleopatra documentary as a counterbalance to the Netflix version
quote: Netflix on Wednesday finally released its polarizing “African Queens” docu-series “Queen Cleopatra,” which depicts the Egyptian ruler as Black. But Egypt has already launched counterprogramming plans to tell its own version of the Pharaonic ruler’s story using “the highest levels of research and scrutiny.”
Al Wathaeqya, the Egyptian state-backed Documentary Channel, recently announced plans to produce a documentary with the government-owned broadcaster, United Media Services — an apparent response to what some Egyptian critics called “historical revisionism” in “Queen Cleopatra” by Netflix and others.
“Starting as usual in all documentary production sector and documentary channel work, there are working sessions currently being held with a number of specialists in history, archaeology, and anthropology; to subject research related to the subject of the film and its image to the highest levels of research and scrutiny,” the channel said, according to a translation of its Facebook post.
Independent filmmaker and Egyptologist Curtis Ryan Woodside also posted a 90-minute English-language documentary about Cleopatra VII on his YouTube channel Wednesday, rejecting “biased” opinions and “misinformed,” modern and American iterations of the queen. The film discusses Egypt’s multi-racial society and features commentary from Kathleen Martinez, a Dominican archaeologist “in search of Cleopatra,” and Zahi Hawass, Egypt’s former minister of state for antiquities affairs who has vehemently opposed Netflix’s portrayal of the ancient ruler.
Hawass also railed Wednesday against Netflix’s documentary series — the “African Queens” collection is produced by Jada Pinkett Smith — during an Arabic-language interview on Egypt’s MBC network. He said that when he gives lectures in the U.S., he has been confronted by Black demonstrators calling him a liar. But he said he believes they have “disorganized thinking” when it comes to ancient Egypt, which is his field of expertise.
He also reiterated in the interview that the only Egyptian rulers known to have been Black were the Kushite kings of the 25th dynasty (747-656 BC), and he pushed back against Black Americans who have claimed that the Egyptian civilization has Black origins and are “obsessed” with the colonization of Egypt throughout its history. He also hoped Netflix would also stream the documentaries about Cleopatra that he has worked on. (The Al Wathaeqya channel also recently acquired Hawass’ “Roots of Ancient Egypt,” scheduled to air in May.)
Question: Does the world really need more documentaries about Cleopatra?
Posted by Doug M (Member # 7650) on :
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx:
quote:Originally posted by Doug M: And they don't need Egypt's permission to do it because Egypt does not control the history of the ancient Nile or Africa in general.
But they could in some case hinder certain scholars that they see as too Afrocentric, to work in Egypt itself, so these scholars loose access to primary material in the form of tombs, ancient buildings and other monuments. They could maybe make it harder for "Afrocentric" archaeologists to participate in digs in Egypt and so on.
But perhaps this storm is a phenomena that will pass by rather quickly, and things will soon be calm again.
This has nothing to do with Afrocentrism. All the facts and evidence are already available. It is all about promoting a Eurocentric vision of Egypt created by European explorers over 100 years ago. There are no new facts being discovered that are going to overturn what we already know. It is a situation that these people like Zahi Hawass know full dam well that the tomb of Amenhotep III depicts him as a black African, along with the tomb of his father Thutmosis IV. There is no serious debate to be had about this. He is just a liar. Period. The modern country of Egypt is relatively poor and now in debt due to the construction of a new museum and a new capital city. They need to promote tourism as a result of covid and all the debts they need to pay off. And promoting the fantasy of a white ancient Egypt is part of that strategy. And that has always been Zahi Hawass' job as he mainly appears on western television shows speaking English to Western audiences. Again, notice how he worked with Curtis Ryan Woodside to make a Cleopatra documentary, where Woodside is known for white washing the ancient Nile Valley. And at the end of the day, the SCA is just acting as custodians of a white ancient Egypt for Europeans. Because most of the funding for digs still come from Europe and most of the research done in European institutions and the discipline of Egyptology itself run by European institutions. Not to mention the SCA itself has its origins in Auguste Marriette, a French Egyptologist. Most of the money for the new museum was paid for by the Japanese government (75%).
quote: In 1860 alone, Mariette set up 35 new dig sites, whilst attempting to conserve already-dug sites. His success was aided by the fact that no rivals were permitted to dig in Egypt, a fact that the British (who had previously had the majority of Egyptologists active in the country) and Germans (who were politically allied with the country's Ottoman rulers) protested at as a 'sweetheart deal' between Egypt and France. Nor were Mariette's relations with the Khedive always stable. The Khedive, like many potentates, assumed all discoveries ranked as treasure and that what went to the museum in Cairo went only at his pleasure. Even early on, in February 1859, Mariette dashed to Thebes to confiscate a boatload of antiquities from the nearby tomb of Queen Ahhotep I that were to have been sent to the Khedive.
In his position as Director of the Antiquities Service Mariette made concerted efforts to stifle the careers of Egyptians such as Ahmad Kamal within the Service. Heinrich Brugsch, a German philologist documented how Mariette was suspicious of Egyptians and forbade Egyptians from copying hieroglyphs in the Cairo Museum. Mariette was concerned, Brugsch states, that Egyptians might be appointed into official positions within the Museum and was dedicated to stopping that from occurring.
quote: This political cartoon features John Bull as a British soldier physically protecting Egypt, who is depicted as the sexualised female object of Orientalist fantasy, passively leaning into Bull’s arms. The Turkish Sultan pleads with Britain ‘to consider whether the time has not now arrived for her return to the arms of her loving uncle.’ Victorians regularly played with gendered tropes to portray Britain as a masculine and heroic saviour, Egypt as feminine and frail, and the Ottoman Empire as weak and in decline. The scene unfolding in front of the Sphinx reflects the appropriation of Egypt’s ancient past during the British occupation of the country.
Keep in mind that the main reason for both the British and French invading Egypt was for trade with the East. And the Suez canal was created primarily by the French and then sold to the British.
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by Doug M:
Neflix as a white company did this on purpose to promote the image of black African history on the Nile as basically feel good fiction.
Again it is a hustle. White media is playing the ultimate race hustle on black people by giving themselves agency on black representation in the media.
this is bullshit and racist
They gave agency to Jada Pinkett Smith a wealthy and influential woman and this what she decided to do
You simply do not like what she decided to do and want to blame white people for it
She did it because she thought it would be controversial and subversive
and she was right, it is
You don't respect black agency unless it's approved by you politically and I suspect unless it's male agency also
She did Nzinga too and you don't give her any credit for that, you actually mocked that for low ratings
Rightly or wrongly the idea that Cleopatra was black has been a part Black culture since at least 1918. It may not be correct but that is subversive and it undermines the idea of Greece being purely "white", which it is not (although a term not well defined) In fact white supremacists hold Greece and Rome as the pinnacle of Western culture, not Egypt and they don't buy into the idea that Greek culture was stolen from the Egyptians
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
@ Doug M But if Egyptians perceive some scholars or other visitors as Afrocentric, or in other ways distorting Egyptian history they could theoretically put up hinders for these scholars to work in Egypt, which of course can be a disadvantage for those persons. Hard to make a carrier as for example an Egyptologist if you can not work in Egypt.
Egypt have the right to determine who visits the country and who works there. So theoretically they can put up some hindrances. Probably it will not happen, but they could do it.
Maybe such decisions are not based in science but in politics, and money.
Posted by Doug M (Member # 7650) on :
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx: But if Egyptians perceive some scholars or other visitors as Afrocentric, or in other ways distorting Egyptian history they could theoretically put up hinders for these scholars to work in Egypt, which of course can be a disadvantage for those persons. Hard to make a carrier as for example an Egyptologist if you can not work in Egypt.
Egypt have the right to determine who visits the country and who works there. So theoretically they can put up some hindrances. Probably it will not happen, but they could do it.
Maybe such decisions are not based in science but in politics.
Again, most of the facts are already available for anybody to see in books, journals online and elsewhere covering over 100 years of excavations, artifacts and study. This isn't about going to Egypt to uncover "new" proof. It isn't necessary. Again, Zahi Hawass will never ever debate the features of Amenhotep III or Thutmosis IV related to black ancient Nile Valley Africans. There is no debate. The whole hustle is all about controlled talking points that they can use to AVOID having to talk about actual facts and evidence. Egyptology as a whole is all about controlled talking points that mislead and distort the facts themselves. That is the point. And Netflix in promoting Cleopatra as a talking point is also following the same methodology. As Cleopatra the Greek has absolutely nothing to do with the Old, Middle and New Kingdom pharaohs. So how she looked is irrelevant. But this focus on her just allows them to keep their academic hustle going by not addressing the key facts that are already available for everybody to see. Afrocentrics didn't create those temples and monuments in the Nile Valley so if anything it is Egyptology arguing with the facts not so-called "Afrocentrics".
Keep in mind that the Netflix documentary was mostly filmed in Morocco, along with other locations in Egypt. But that points to the fact that the SCA already knew what this series was all about in the first place before they allowed them to shoot there. So somehow it is odd they have all this to say now after the fact, but didn't stop Netflix from filming there. Like I said, it is a hustle.
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
Politics have not always with facts to do. If certain ideas challenge the national image of a country´s history, and maybe even threatens its incomes there is a risk that certain politicians will try to do something about it.
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
Rightly or wrongly the idea that Cleopatra was black has been a part Black culture since at least 1918. It may not be correct but that is subversive and it undermines the idea of Greece being purely white, which it is not In fact white supremacists hold Greece and Rome as the pinnacle of Western culture, not Egypt and they don't buy into the idea that Greek culture was stolen from the Egyptians
Yes, some extremists still see ancient Greece and Rome as defenders of the Western civilisation against foreign peoples. The film 300 about Spartans fight against Persians at Thermopylai has been used in Nationalist propaganda in Italy and Greece and other places.
Here is a picture from an Italian nationalist party which shows Greek hoplites as defenders of European civilisation
The text says: "Defend your values, your civilization, your neighborhood"
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx: But if Egyptians perceive some scholars or other visitors as Afrocentric, or in other ways distorting Egyptian history they could theoretically put up hinders for these scholars to work in Egypt, which of course can be a disadvantage for those persons. Hard to make a carrier as for example an Egyptologist if you can not work in Egypt.
Egypt have the right to determine who visits the country and who works there. So theoretically they can put up some hindrances. Probably it will not happen, but they could do it.
Maybe such decisions are not based in science but in politics.
We already see this gatekeeping being breached by Brazilian researchers in your thread in Egyptology: Egyptian ministry questions the reconstruction of the Nazlet Khater 2 where researchers took video an unbeknownst to Hawass and the Egyptian government took video of the skull in Egypt. Then they made a reconstruction looking like a "sub-Saharan" and Hawass didn't like it
The hinderance was already there or perceived by the Brazilians as being there and will be ongoing. Kevin Hart was accused of making remarks and the protestors never produced a source so it could have been entirely fabricated and done so perhaps because they didn't like his support of Black Sands This is a culture war and has been simmering for decades, both sides distort and there is also multi-millions of dollars involved The Egyptian ministry that complained is called the Egyptian Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities Those things are linked Tourism is around 10% of Egypt GDP At the same time over the past 10 years there has been less of white supremacist "March of the Titans" propaganda videos and an increase of well edited Afrocentrist youtube videos, Mr Imhotep, King's Monologue, etc, with high view counts and no Hollywood backing. The whole thing is a big mess and will only get worse
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by Doug M:
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx:
quote:Originally posted by Doug M: And they don't need Egypt's permission to do it because Egypt does not control the history of the ancient Nile or Africa in general.
But they could in some case hinder certain scholars that they see as too Afrocentric, to work in Egypt itself, so these scholars loose access to primary material in the form of tombs, ancient buildings and other monuments. They could maybe make it harder for "Afrocentric" archaeologists to participate in digs in Egypt and so on.
But perhaps this storm is a phenomena that will pass by rather quickly, and things will soon be calm again.
This has nothing to do with Afrocentrism.
It's about a TV series depicting Cleopatra as a black woman and Molefi Asante said "As a historian philosopher I give her our total support"
I actually name people You are in a polemical realm "of they", "white executives", "African scholars"
all these nameless entities you theorize about rather than real people who say real things
Posted by Doug M (Member # 7650) on :
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx: Politics have not always with facts to do. If certain ideas challenge the national image of a country´s history, and maybe even threatens its incomes there is a risk that certain politicians will try to do something about it.
It has been a hustle since Europeans set foot in Egypt. This has always been the basis of the controversy, not so-called Afrocentrics. It goes all the way back to the 1800s and the creation of race science, partly to prove the superiority of whites using skulls from Egypt. The only difference now is that the hustle is being promoted by Egyptian mouthpieces under Zahi Hawass.
All of the below are fully part of that hustle, where they are making and promoting the same arguments made by various Eurocentric trolls all over the internet. So this shows you these arguments are part of the official establishment of Egyptology itself and have always been.
Private Visit of Queen MERESANKH'S Tomb at Giza (Documentary Clip)
https://youtu.be/PFQKn335-fI?t=1366 Ancient Egyptian Family Feud (FULL DOCUMENTARY) Female Pharaoh Vs. Stepson Timestamp shows discusion of Ramses mummy reiterating all the talking points heard here before.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jymftwQovt0 Secrets Of Giza (FULL DOCUMENTARY) Regurgitating the same hand picked talking points, statues and artwork right from stormfront.
Curtis Ryan Woodside is no scholar or Egyptologist, but just a film maker from South Africa. Yet here he is being given all this special access to these monuments by the SCA as if he is some kind of "expert"....... Yet African scholars have to be worried?
quote: Curtis is a young independent film-maker, Born 15 March 1995 ‘Curtis Ryan Woodside’ in South Africa, but relocated to Italy. Curtis got into filmmaking when he was only about 10 years old, him and his 2 best friends made little videos with their camera.
That is the way Netflix told the story
Posted by Yatunde Lisa Bey (Member # 22253) on :
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx:
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
This has been brewing in forums and on youtube for years
Yes, Netflix Cleopatra has made the conflicts more visible also for a broader public.
One can wonder what ramifications this will have for African American scholars who want to work in Egypt? And also for entertainers like Kevin Hart? Will the gates close?
No, of course not. Whether white north african nationalists like it or not AA's are the leading Africans of the WORLD, with tons of soft power. That is how the Netflix doc got made in the first place.
Someone is going to have to tell me which Hawass documentary has been this high profile or garnered this much attention?
I will wait.
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
Yes, I suppose bad publicity is better than no publicity at all. Seems the series was not especially highly rated here in the West either.
The publicity seems to mostly have emanated from its scandal value, and the "race issue" and not because the series is better than a lot of other documentaries about Cleopatra.
Probably it will be forgotten soon, and in the mean time Egypt will still get most of it´s tourist money from White Europeans (plus Americans, Chinese, Arabs, North Africans and Israelites).
Posted by Firewall (Member # 20331) on :
quote:Originally posted by Doug M:
Basically modern Egypt as most populous country on the African continent is very poor.
Egypt is not low income country,so it's not poor and there are few other countries in africa that have a bigger population then egypt.
Posted by Yatunde Lisa Bey (Member # 22253) on :
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx: Yes, I suppose bad publicity is better than no publicity at all. Seems the series was not especially highly rated here in the West either.
The publicity seems to mostly have emanated from its scandal value, and the "race issue" and not because the series is better than a lot of other documentaries about Cleopatra.
Probably it will be forgotten soon, and in the mean time Egypt will still get most of it´s tourist money from White Europeans (plus Americans, Chinese, Arabs, North Africans and Israelites).
White Americans who go to Egypt will get there and in their eyes they will see a diverse country with what in their eyes is a place with a lot of "black" people and "non" white ethnics...
Arab North Africans that live in the states have already learned this.
Only North African nationalists are trying to be white adjacent. It's a club they can't get into in reality unless it's honorary scientific classification as "eurasian"
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
I agree with Doug, if Jada Pinkett and Netflix wanted to show a more indigenous Nile Valley queen they could have done so. There are many to chose from. But most of them are not so famous as Cleopatra so the political statement would not be so strong.
I think she had anticipated some reactions on the show, but maybe not the massive backlash that followed.
Hope someone can do a movie or good drama documentary about Amanirenas, an exciting historical figure that fought against Rome.
In the meantime one can always read a novel about her
Basically modern Egypt as most populous country on the African continent is very poor.
Egypt is not low income country,so it's not poor and there are few other countries in africa that have a bigger population then egypt.
You are right. It is the largest country in the Arab world but relatively poor. It is not as wealthy as European countries, but wealthier than some African countries and not as wealthy as some gulf states. And overall the standard of living in Egypt has always been ranked low among nations. This is one of the reasons for the Arab spring.
Posted by Doug M (Member # 7650) on :
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx: Yes, I suppose bad publicity is better than no publicity at all. Seems the series was not especially highly rated here in the West either.
The publicity seems to mostly have emanated from its scandal value, and the "race issue" and not because the series is better than a lot of other documentaries about Cleopatra.
Probably it will be forgotten soon, and in the mean time Egypt will still get most of it´s tourist money from White Europeans (plus Americans, Chinese, Arabs, North Africans and Israelites).
Netflix never actually promoted the series much is part of the problem. And the fact that Jada Pinkett Smith is associated didn't help.
The problem is that you don't fight misinformation and lies with more misinformation and lies. Black people are not getting any boost to their efforts to tell the truth about the ancient Nile Valley with misinformation and half truths. The biggest weapon African scholars have always had is the facts and evidence being on their side. It has always been Europeans that have promoted this false history of the Nile and this is what the African scholars have always been challenging. So to sit up here and say it is OK to use half truths and lies in order to support your claims is disingenuous. Because in doing that you have legitimized the half truths and lies of the Eurocentrics. But again, you got come folks who treat African history as a hustle so for them anything goes and in many ways they are no better than Eurocentrics. For those people it is all about protecting their hustle as opposed to the facts. Because at the end of the day this "debate" should have been over by now because the overwhelming facts and evidence are in support of the black African origins of the Nile Valley. But if all you want to do is to continue a side hustle peddling nonsense then of course you would agree with this kind of strategy. Which is why I said that both Netflix and Egyptology seem to be on the same page in that sense as each wants to keep the hustle going as long as possible.
A hustle:
quote: Join the real-life Indiana Jones for an epic journey of exploration and discovery. Don’t miss out on this unforgettable evening as Dr. Hawass reveals the most closely guarded secrets of ancient Egypt and presents his groundbreaking new discoveries and latest research live on stage. As the man behind all major discoveries in Egypt over the last few decades and director of several ongoing archaeological projects, Dr. Hawass may yet surprise you with unexpected revelations that will make news across the world.
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
A girl of Chinese (presumably) origin (and her dad) reviews the film. It got thumbs down
quote: Critics and audiences alike are joining hands and coming together to pan Netflix's woke Queen Cleopatra, quite possibly the worst docuseries ever made.
Egypt is low middle income,so it's not a low income country,so not poor but not rich either. There is alot that are middle income(low to upper) and a some that are rich. Anyway most folks in egypt are not poor but a large minority are.
What is the poverty rate in Egypt? Official estimates for 2019 showed that 29.7 percent of the Egyptian population was poor. In 2015, about 27.8 percent of Egyptians were poor. Between 2015 and 2017, households' per capita consumption growth was negative for most households reflecting the sharp rise in inflation following the 2016 currency depreciation. Source worldbank
GDP (PPP) • Per capita $16,980[9] (93rd) or
GDP (nominal) • Per capita $3,644[9] (128th)
Egypt is considered to be a regional power in North Africa, the Middle East and the Muslim world, and a middle power worldwide.[18] It is a developing country having a diversified economy, which is the third-largest in Africa, the 41st-largest economy by nominal GDP, and the 20th-largest globally by PPP. Egypt is a founding member of the United Nations, the Non-Aligned Movement, the Arab League, the African Union, Organisation of Islamic Cooperation and the World Youth Forum.
Egypt's GDP ranks quite high, but its GDP per capita is below the world average, and using the World Bank's categories, Egypt is a “lower middle income” country [6].Oct 14, 2021
Posted by Firewall (Member # 20331) on :
Speaking of the population egypt here some info on that.I am not posting all of it but here is some of it.
Population history of Egypt
quote: Egypt has a long and involved demographic history. This is partly due to the territory's geographical location at the crossroads of several major cultural areas: North Africa, the Middle East, the Mediterranean and Sub-Saharan Africa. In addition, Egypt has experienced several invasions and being part of many regional empires during its long history, including by the Canaanites, the Ancient Libyans, the Assyrians, the Kushites (a Nubian civilization), the Persians, the Greeks, the Romans, and the Arabs.
Neolithic and Predynastic periods Around 8000 BCE, the Sahara had a wet phase, the Neolithic Subpluvial (Holocene Wet Phase). There is very little evidence of human occupation of the Egyptian Nile Valley during the Early and Middle Holocene periods. This may be due to problems in site preservation. The Middle Nile Valley (Nubia) had population settlements attested by occupational sequence since the Pleistocene and the Holocene.[1][2] People from the surrounding areas moved into the Sahara, and evidence suggests that the populations of the Nile Valley reduced in size.[3] Several scholars have argued that the African origins of the Egyptian civilisation derived from pastoral communities which emerged in both the Egyptian and northern Sudanese regions of the Nile Valley in the 5th millennium BCE.[4][5] Predynastic Egypt is conventionally said to begin about 6000 BCE. Between 5300 and 3500 BCE. the wet phase declined and increasing aridity pushed the Saharan peoples into locations with reliable water, such as oases and the Nile Valley.[5] The mid-Holocene droughts drove refuges from the Southern Levant and the Eastern Sahara into Egypt, where they mixed and settled.[6]
From around 4800 to 4300 BCE, the Merimde culture, known from the typesite Merimde Beni-Salame, flourished in Lower Egypt.[7][8] Later, Lower Egypt was also the home of the Buto Maadi culture, best known from the site at Maadi near Cairo.[9] In Upper Egypt, the predynastic Badari culture was followed by the Naqada culture (Amratian).[10] Around 3000 BCE, the wet phase of the Sahara came to an end. The Saharan populations retreated to the south towards the Sahel, and east in the direction of the Nile Valley. It was these populations, in addition to Neolithic farmers from the Near East, that likely played a role in the formation of the Egyptian state as they brought their food crops, sheep, goats, and cattle to the Nile Valley.[11]
Material culture and Archaeological data Located in the extreme north-east corner of Africa, ancient Egyptian society was at a crossroads between the African and Near Eastern regions. Early Egyptologists noted the increased novelty and seemingly rapid change in Predynastic pottery and noted trade contacts between ancient Egypt and the Middle East.[12][13] Fekri Hassan and Edwin et al. point to mutual influence from both inner Africa as well as the Levant.[14]Similar cultural features have been observed between the early Saharan populations and dynastic Egypt such as pottery, iconography and mummification.[15][16][17]
The culture of Merimde in Lower Egypt, among others, has been linked to the Levant.[8] The pottery of the Buto Maadi culture, best known from the site at Maadi near Cairo, also shows connections with the southern Levant.[9] In Upper Egypt, the predynastic Badari culture was followed by the Naqada culture (Amratian).[10] These groups have been described to be culturally related to the Nubian and Northeastern African populations.[2] Upper Egypt is considered to have formed the pre-dominant basis for the cultural development of Pharaonic Egypt and the Proto-dynastic kings emerged from the Naqada region.[18][19]Several dynasties of southern or Upper Egyptian origin, which included the 11th, 12th, 17th, 18th and 25th dynasties, reunified and reinvigorated pharaonic Egypt after periods of fragmentation.[20]
Egyptian scholar Gamal Mokhtar argued that the inventory of hieroglyphic symbols derived from "fauna and flora used in the signs [which] are essentially African" and in "regards to writing, we have seen that a purely Nilotic, hence African origin not only is not excluded, but probably reflects the reality" although he acknowledged the geographical location of Egypt made it a receptacle for many influences.[21]
Frank Yurco in 1989 expressed the view that among foreign populations, Nubians were closest ethnically to the Egyptians, shared the same culture in the predynastic period, and used the same pharaonic political structure.[22] Yurco wrote that: "The ancient Egyptians, like their modern descendants, were of varying complexions of color, from the light Mediterranean type (like Nefertiti), to the light brown of Middle Egypt, to the darker brown of Upper Egypt, to the darkest shade around Aswan and the First Cataract region, where even today the population shifts to Nubian."[23] Yurco noted that some Middle Kingdom rulers, particularly some pharaohs of the Twelfth Dynasty, had strong Nubian features due to the origin of the dynasty in the Aswan region of southern Egypt. He also identifies the pharaoh Seqenenre Tao of the Seventeenth Dynasty, as having Nubian features.[24] In 1996 he said that "the peoples of Egypt, the Sudan, and much of North-East Africa are generally regarded as a Nilotic continuity, with widely ranging physical features (complexions light to dark, various hair and craniofacial types)".[25]
quote: Modern Egyptians Patricia Smith, in her entry noted that "the biological characteristics of modern Egyptians show a north-south cline, reflecting their geographic location between sub-Saharan Africa and the Levant. This is expressed in DNA, blood groups, serum proteins and genetic disorders (Filon 1996; Hammer et al. 1998; Krings et al. 1999). They can also be expressed in phenotypic characteristics that can be identified in teeth and bones (Crichton 1966; Froment 1992; Keita 1996). These characteristics include head form, facial and nasal characteristics, jaw relationships, tooth size, morphology and upper/lower limb proportions. In all these features, Modern Egyptians resemble Sub-Saharan Africans (Howells 1989, Keita 1995)."[91] Gad et al (2020) described recent studies which were conducted on modern Egyptian samples had produced predominantly European or west Eurasian haplogroups.[64]
quote: Dental morphology Biological anthropologist Shomarka Keita takes issue with the suggestion of Irish that Egyptians and Nubians were not primary descendants of the African epipaleolithic and Neolithic populations. Keita also criticizes him for ignoring the possibility that the dentition of the ancient Egyptians could have been caused by "in situ microevolution" driven by dietary change, rather than by racial admixture.[115] Eric Crubezy's team showed that Predynastic cemetery in Adaima in Upper Egypt showed "Khoisan" dental markers (formally referred to as "Bushmen canine")[116] [117]
quote: In 2023, Christopher Ehret reported that the physical anthropological findings from the “major burial sites of those founding locales of ancient Egypt in the fourth millennium BCE, notably El-Badari as well as Naqada, show no demographic indebtedness to the Levant”. Ehret specified that these studies revealed cranial and dental affinities with "closest parallels" to other longtime populations in the surrounding areas of Northeastern Africa “such as Nubia and the northern Horn of Africa”. He further commented that the Naqada and Badarian populations did not migrate “from somewhere else but were descendants of the long-term inhabitants of these portions of Africa going back many millennia”.[118]
Source wikipedia
Posted by Firewall (Member # 20331) on :
Funny how concerned many African Americans are with a country that they do not belong to, which most of them have never visited, and which most of them do not descend from or have any ties to. And they also seem to worry much about if todays Egyptians are descended from ancient Egyptians or not. It is hard to prove if that girl descends from ancient Egyptians or not without a DNA test. He can not know her descendancy just from her looks. So to call her "Arab chick" is rather silly.
And who knows how much she can say about the iconography of ancient pictures? She has not touched on that subject very much. She has mainly said that she grew up among ancient monuments and have been visiting museums since she was a child.
Shall be interesting to see if Nora answers him. She said in one of her videos that she will consult experts so she can make a more educational video.
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
In the end it is really rather irrelevant what Americans or Europeans online think about Egyptian history. It would be more interesting to hear what Egyptians think, both those with light skin and those with dark skin. After all it is they who live in Egypt, and whose children will live in Egypt in the future.
Seems that a new generation of Egyptian historians and archaeologists are being trained, and perhaps they one day can decolonize Egyptian history and let Egyptians themselves discover and define who they are.
Posted by Firewall (Member # 20331) on :
Was Cleopatra Black? Gal Gadot's Cleopatra Film Controversy | Dr. Rebecca Futo Kennedy Study of Antiquity and the Middle Ages In this episode Dr. Rebecca Futo Kennedy takes us into another intense history debate and that is the question of "Was Cleopatra Black?" In light of the upcoming movie and controversy surrounding Gal Gadot playing Cleopatra I felt like this was an excellent time to use this episode. What was her ethnicity? Why is it controversial? Was she Macedonian? Are Macedonians even Greek? Was there an African in the Ptolemy family tree? Is this argument merely people attempting to project their modern narratives and politics on the past? Why does it even matter? Can we even answer the question? In this talk Dr. Kennedy explains that until we stop attempting to remove black Africans from Egyptian history and until we stop using the modern and inaccurate term Sub-Saharan in our dialogue involving ancient Africa and Egypt it doesn't matter. Again, in many ways this talk merely shows that this debate revolves more around modern politics and narratives rather than Cleopatra herself, the Ptolemies and how the ancient Egyptians saw them or themselves. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DKyEUB8eXE Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
Now an Egyptian legal team sues Netflix for 2 billion dollars
quote:Egyptian Legal Team Sues Netflix for USD 2B Over Cleopatra Documentary
Cairo Scene May 14, 2023
The team has called on UNESCO to intervene and affirm Egypt's right to an initial compensation of USD 2 billion.
A team of Egyptian lawyers and archaeologists is calling for legal action against streaming platform Netflix, demanding a monetary compensation of USD 2 billion for falsely depicting the image of Cleopatra in their recently released documentary film, ‘Queen Cleopatra’.
The team has called on UNESCO to intervene and affirm Egypt's right to an initial compensation of USD 2 billion for the alleged distortion of Egyptian heritage.
Egyptian lawyer Amr Abdelsalam, part of the case’s legal team, has filed a lawsuit before the Administrative Court of the State Council to compel the Egyptian government, represented by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to take all diplomatic measures and communicate with relevant international organizations to ban the recent documentary.
The film has triggered a debate prior to its release due to the way it changed Cleopatra’s ethnicity, which many saw as a deliberate erasure and reinterpretation of history.
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx: ^^ Is he an American? Or Egyptian?
Funny how concerned many African Americans are with a country that they do not belong to, which most of them have never visited, and which most of them do not descend from or have any ties to. And they also seem to worry much about if todays Egyptians are descended from ancient Egyptians or not. It is hard to prove if that girl descends from ancient Egyptians or not without a DNA test. He can not know her descendancy just from her looks. So to call her "Arab chick" is rather silly.
And who knows how much she can say about the iconography of ancient pictures? She has not touched on that subject very much. She has mainly said that she grew up among ancient monuments and have been visiting museums since she was a child.
Shall be interesting to see if Nora answers him. She said in one of her videos that she will consult experts so she can make a more educational video.
The question was whether the ancient dynastic people were black Africans. That is not a question of modern Egyptian identity. The two are separated by over 2000 years of history.
Of course all of that history is part of that identity, which is why so many are calling out Netflix. But that also means that Egypt's identity is a mixture resulting from all these different phases of that history. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.
As he said, not only does Netflix make Cleopatra black, but also much of her family. Obviously that is nonsense.
Posted by Doug M (Member # 7650) on :
A lot of people may not know this, but Egypt has been a big part of the Arab cinema industry going back to the 1940s with Egyptian film studios being the largest in the Arab world. Oddly (or not so oddly), they have never done any movies on Cleopatra or ancient history that I know of. Most of this obsession with Cleopatra comes from Western cinema, which is especially influenced by Shakespeare.
quote: Film scholar Viola Shafik, author of three books on the history of Arab cinema, says that by the mid-1930s, Egypt had already earned international distinction as a rising film center. By the end of World War II, Egypt was producing about 50 films each year, and by the 1980s, Egypt distributed nearly 100 films per year.
Despite British colonialism, she says, “it was a relatively prosperous economy,” which allowed local entrepreneurs and artists to invest in film and create an industry that started “catering for Egypt and its neighboring countries.” The Egyptian film industry spiked in the 1980s with the introduction of the video cassette, through which it expanded its viewership into the more conservative Arabian Peninsula countries, which had few cinemas but plenty of home video players. At its peak, it was the third-largest film industry in the world, “the Arab Hollywood,” but since then, it has declined. By 2008 it was producing only about 40 films a year, and more recently it is down to 20 to 30 a year.
Film historians and enthusiasts are today also discovering anew other filmmakers of al-Siddiq’s generation whose works reflected the pan-Arab sentiments of the time, particularly al-makhduʿun (The Dupes, 1973), based on Palestinian writer Ghassan Kanafani’s seminal novel Men in the Sun. It was filmed in Syria, set in Iraq and Kuwait and directed by Egypt’s Tewfiq Saleh. In that pan-Arab vein, Siddiq’s only other feature film, Ors Zein (Wedding of Zein, 1976) is set somewhere in North Africa and based on a story by beloved Sudanese writer Tayeb Saleh.
Yet today, even with a rising generation producing more cinema than ever, the industry is driven less by such pan-Arab stories and more by localized themes that these days bring better opportunities for financing and distribution. Propelling this trend is the worldwide shift in viewing via online platforms and streaming services that have developed their own, content-hungry production houses.
Not to mention Egypt has played a big role in modern music production in the Arab world as well. So given all of that, if they really wanted to make movies about ancient Egypt, they certainly could.
Also on that Note Sudan also has a fledgling movie industry as well.
When it comes to films about older times they also made the film The Emigrant from 1994. It centers around the biblical Joseph (in the film called Ram) who comes to Egypt and becomes caught up in political and sexual intrigues.
When it comes to films about older times they also made the film The Emigrant from 1994. It centers around the biblical Joseph (in the film called Ram) who comes to Egypt and becomes caught up in political and sexual intrigues.
was it worldwide news?
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
^^ Noone claimed that, I just posted those since Doug M said that
quote: Posted by Doug M A lot of people may not know this, but Egypt has been a big part of the Arab cinema industry going back to the 1940s with Egyptian film studios being the largest in the Arab world. Oddly (or not so oddly), they have never done any movies on Cleopatra or ancient history that I know of.
So I just pointed out that they at least made a couple of such films.
And Jada Pinketts show became famous not because it was good but because it got some of the worst reviews of any TV series in recent time and because it upset many Egyptians. Not so much too boast over. But maybe it have some value to be worst too.
Here is a video by YouTuber Amala Ekpunobi about the Netflix series
quote: The new Netflix documentary Queen Cleopatra has been one of the greatest flops in history. Executive producer Jada Pinkett-Smith is blaming white supremacy for its record-low 1% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes, but could it also be that attempting to race swap and rewrite history was just a horrible idea? Let’s get into it.
Amala Ekpunobi
Posted by Doug M (Member # 7650) on :
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx: ^^ Noone claimed that, I just posted those since Doug M said that
quote: Posted by Doug M A lot of people may not know this, but Egypt has been a big part of the Arab cinema industry going back to the 1940s with Egyptian film studios being the largest in the Arab world. Oddly (or not so oddly), they have never done any movies on Cleopatra or ancient history that I know of.
So I just pointed out that they at least made a couple of such films.
And Jada Pinketts show became famous not because it was good but because it got some of the worst reviews of any TV series in recent time and because it upset many Egyptians. Not so much too boast over. But maybe it have some value to be worst too.
Here is a video by YouTuber Amala Ekpunobi about the Netflix series
quote: The new Netflix documentary Queen Cleopatra has been one of the greatest flops in history. Executive producer Jada Pinkett-Smith is blaming white supremacy for its record-low 1% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes, but could it also be that attempting to race swap and rewrite history was just a horrible idea? Let’s get into it.
They have made 0 films about Cleopatra and 0 films about any period of Nile Valley history before Cleopatra. Biblical stories are not history and don't really count. So they don't really care about it all that much, as part of their historical identity. The point being that it is the West that is more concerned about Cleopatra both because of the popularity of Shakespeare and also because Greece and Rome are the foundation of Western colonial civilization. They aren't looking at Cleopatra because they care about the Ancient Nile, they are looking at her because she represents European empire and conquest, along with Rome. This is why the West has done no movies about any earlier periods of the Nile either.
And the reason why most of these films suck is because the people of Egypt don't maintain the traditions of the ancients. So when it comes to accuracy of costume and makeup they basically just look like fantasy cosplay to a large degree. While the Roman equipment and costume is often much more accurate given all the people in Europe who maintain such traditions either culturally or for historical purposes. Same thing goes with ancient Chinese historical productions where the Chinese are able to find various artists and craftsmen able to reproduce authentic textiles and costumes. Yet when it comes to the Nile, they don't actually do any of that and just mostly make up their own interpretation for artistic purposes. Because if they really wanted to be authentic, they would have to go to various African groups who do preserve similar traditions and customs mostly outside the country. And this goes for most of the documentaries produced about Egypt.
Posted by Firewall (Member # 20331) on :
So some of these youtubers are confused on what is flop or not. Having low RT SCORES is not NOT flop if viewership is high.
The cleopatra netflix series is in The TOP 10 for netflix,so when comes to viewership it's not flop.
Netflix’s ‘Queen Cleopatra’ Appears To Have The Worst Audience Score In TV History
quote: While I had heard about the controversy surrounding Netflix’s “docudrama” Queen Cleopatra, I hadn’t been tracking it much since it was actually released a few days ago. It’s #6 in Netflix’s Top 10 list, and I don’t think I’ve seen it go all that much higher than that.
quote: African Queens is a 2023 docudrama focusing on female monarchs, airing on the streaming service Netflix. The series is produced and narrated by Jada Pinkett Smith and features dramatized fictional re-enactments as well as interviews with experts. The first season covers Njinga, Queen of Ndongo and Matamba, and is directed by Ethosheia Hylton. The second season focuses on Queen of the Ptolemaic Kingdom of Egypt, Pharaoh Cleopatra, and is directed by Tina Gharavi.
Summary The docu-series combines dramatic recreations with interviews with historians, experts, and people from the modern-day regions that the Queen ruled over. Producer Jada Pinkett Smith cited a lack of stories covering Black queens as her inspiration for helming the series.[1] She said: “We don’t often get to see or hear stories about Black queens, and that was really important for me, as well as for my daughter, and just for my community to be able to know those stories because there are tons of them.”[2]
For the first season, the life of Njinga, Queen of Ndongo and Matamba, is explored.[3] Interviewees include Kellie Carter Jackson, Wellesley College associate professor in the Department of Africana Studies; Diambi Kabatusuila, the present-day traditional Queen of the Bakwa Luntu people in Central Kasaï; and Rosa Cruz e Silva, the former director of the National Archives of Angola.[4][5]
The second season explores the reign of Cleopatra, Queen of the Ptolemaic Kingdom of Egypt.[6] Professor Shelley P. Haley was interviewed for the second season.[7]
Reception African Queens: Njinga
quote: On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, 88% of 8 critics' reviews are positive, with an average rating of 7.3/10.[9] Metacritic assigned African Queens: Njinga a weighted average score of 69 out of 100, based on 5 critics, indicating "generally favorable reviews".[10] Ellen E. Jones of The Guardian was critical of the first series, awarding it 2 out of 5 stars, saying that "This tale of a 17th-century African female ruler features impressive academics, but they're drowned out by poor-quality dramatic sequences. It lacks context, analysis or personality."[11] Angie Han of The Hollywood Reporter was also critical, saying that the format limited the ability to go deeply into the subject.[12] Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times, however, praised the first series and gave it three out of four stars.[13] Luke Peppa of the Financial Times cited Black Panther as a watershed for telling African stories, and that much of the stories of the continent have not been told.[14]
Queen Cleopatra On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, 15% of 13 critics' reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.3/10.[15] The audience score is 3% out of 10,000 reviews. Metacritic assigned Queen Cleopatra a weighted average score of 45 out of 100, based on 5 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews", with an user score of 0.1 out of 337 ratings.[16] Anita Singh of The Daily Telegraph gave it just 2 out of 5 stars, saying, "It's too soapy for serious history fans, and not enough of a soap for viewers who like juicy historical dramas."[17] The Indian Express writer Rohan Naahar says the series "tells the legendary monarch's tale with all the dramatic heft of a Wikipedia article."[18] On IMDb, the show has a rating of 1/10 out of 63,000 reviews.[19]
Casting of Cleopatra controversy Further information: Cleopatra race controversy and Ancient Egyptian race controversy
Cleopatra was played by Adele James in the second season's fictional recreation scenes. James is a British actress who is Black and of mixed ancestry; her skin color caused controversy over the depiction of Cleopatra's race.[20]
The government of Egypt responded to the casting decision negatively. Egypt's Ministry of Antiquities stated that the series represented a "falsification of Egyptian history."[2] The Secretary General of the Supreme Council of Archeology through the Egyptian Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities released a statement on the issue, saying that "Queen Cleopatra was light-skinned and (had) Hellenic features." They cited coins, statues, and other depictions of Cleopatra as evidence, adding "far from any ethnic racism, stressing full respect for African civilizations and for our brothers in the African continent that brings us all together."[21][22] Former antiquities minister and Egyptologist Zahi Hawass was critical of the second season. He said, "This is completely fake. Cleopatra was Greek, meaning that she was light skinned, not black," adding that "Netflix is trying to provoke confusion by spreading false and deceptive facts that the origin of the Egyptian civilisation is black."[23][24][20]
Other responses from Egypt include an Egyptian lawyer who sued to block Netflix in the country, alleging that Netflix was promoting Afrocentrism and attempting to erase Egyptian history.[25] The Egyptian channel, al-Wathaeqya, announced it was producing a documentary about the "true" life of Cleopatra in response to the "revisionism" of the Netflix series.[26][27] Several evening talk shows on Egyptian television discussed and criticized the series as well.[2]
Director Gharavi defended the casting, stating, "Doing the research, I realized what a political act it would be to see Cleopatra portrayed by a Black actress".[23] Producers of the series stated that "[Cleopatra's] ethnicity is not the focus of Queen Cleopatra, but we did intentionally decide to depict her of mixed ethnicity to reflect theories about Cleopatra’s possible Egyptian ancestry and the multicultural nature of ancient Egypt."[1] Adele James questioned the validity of the concept of "blackwashing" and expressed her disappointment with racial perceptions "that people are either so self-loathing or so threatened by Blackness that they feel the need to do that, to separate Egypt from the rest of the continent".[28][29]
wikipedia
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
quote:Originally posted by Doug M: They have made 0 films about Cleopatra and 0 films about any period of Nile Valley history before Cleopatra. Biblical stories are not history and don't really count.
At least Egypt and Syria made a TV series about Cleopatra in 2010. At least it ought to have been seen by people in Egypt and Syria. A Syrian actress played the leading role. It was not a documentary though but a fictionalized tale. If it was better or worse than Jada Pinkett Smiths series I don´t know, I just know that Zahi Hawass did not like it (which he has said about other movies and series about ancient Egypt too, as for example the French animated film La Reine Soleil).
If films about the Bible shall be included or not can be up to discussion, but at least The Emigrant took place in ancient Egypt and also included figures who were Egyptians.
Can be interesting to see if they will make a drama documentary about Cleopatra as they have announced.
Posted by Firewall (Member # 20331) on :
There have been movies about ancient egypt that is not biblical or not about cleopatra made by the west.
Here are some
Aida films
Faraon (1966)
The Egyptian
Land of the Pharaohs
The Lion of Thebes
The Loves of Pharaoh
The Pharaohs' Woman
Decline of an Empire
Nefertiti, figlia del sole
This one was is a mexican made one from 1973. Nefertiti y Aquenatos
There are more.
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
Yes, even Sweden made an Aida film
quote: The plot largely follows the plot of the opera Aida. Aida is the daughter of the Ethiopian king, but has become a slave at the Egyptian court. No one knows her real background. The two countries are at war and the army returns with Aida's father as a prisoner of war, but no one knows his identity.
quote: Agora (Spanish: Ágora) is a 2009 English-language Spanish historical drama film directed by Alejandro Amenábar and written by Amenábar and Mateo Gil. The biopic stars Rachel Weisz as Hypatia, a mathematician, philosopher and astronomer in late 4th-century Roman Egypt, who investigates the flaws of the geocentric Ptolemaic system and the heliocentric model that challenges it. Surrounded by religious turmoil and social unrest, Hypatia struggles to save the knowledge of classical antiquity from destruction. Max Minghella co-stars as Davus, Hypatia's father's slave, and Oscar Isaac as Hypatia's student, and later prefect of Alexandria, Orestes.
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
quote:Originally posted by Firewall: There is also this one. Agora (film)
quote: Agora (Spanish: Ágora) is a 2009 English-language Spanish historical drama film directed by Alejandro Amenábar and written by Amenábar and Mateo Gil. The biopic stars Rachel Weisz as Hypatia, a mathematician, philosopher and astronomer in late 4th-century Roman Egypt, who investigates the flaws of the geocentric Ptolemaic system and the heliocentric model that challenges it. Surrounded by religious turmoil and social unrest, Hypatia struggles to save the knowledge of classical antiquity from destruction. Max Minghella co-stars as Davus, Hypatia's father's slave, and Oscar Isaac as Hypatia's student, and later prefect of Alexandria, Orestes.
Yes that one I have seen too. The leading role is played by Rachel Weisz, the star from the two first Mummy films.
Rachel Weisz Posted by Firewall (Member # 20331) on :
quote:Originally posted by Archeopteryx: Here is a reaction from a Greek YouTuber
That lady showing how the ancient egyptians show themselves was misleading.She show pictures of folks living in roman egypt who live in a certain area and were the upperclass. The average egyptian did not look like those pictures plus those mummies found were 900 out of a population of more then 4 to 5 million or more.
They were found in middle egypt and that was way after the pharaonic period of egypt.
Roman egypt had more numbers of browns and whites and more mixing of the races then ever before then egypt of the past to keep that in mind.
People of Fayum
quote: Under Hellenic rule, Egypt hosted several Greek settlements, mostly concentrated in Alexandria, but also in a few other cities, where Greek settlers lived alongside some seven to ten million native Egyptians,[10] or possibly a total of three to five million for all ethnicities, according to lower estimates.[11]
Faiyum's earliest Greek inhabitants were soldier-veterans and cleruchs (elite military officials) who were settled by the Ptolemaic kings on reclaimed lands.[10][12] Native Egyptians also came to settle in Faiyum from all over the country, notably the Nile Delta, Upper Egypt, Oxyrhynchus and Memphis, to undertake the labor involved in the land reclamation process, as attested by personal names, local cults and recovered papyri.[13]
It is estimated that as much as 30 percent of the population of Faiyum was Greek during the Ptolemaic period, with the rest being native Egyptians.[13] By the Roman period, much of the "Greek" population of Faiyum was made-up of either Hellenized Egyptians or people of mixed Egyptian-Greek origins.[14] Later, in the Roman Period, many veterans of the Roman army, who, initially at least, were not Egyptian but people from disparate cultural and ethnic backgrounds, settled in the area after the completion of their service, and formed social relations and intermarried with local populations.[15]
While commonly believed to represent Greek settlers in Egypt,[16][17] the Faiyum portraits instead reflect the complex synthesis of the predominant Egyptian culture and that of the elite Greek minority in the city.[13]
According to Walker, the early Ptolemaic Greek colonists married local women and adopted Egyptian religious beliefs, and by Roman times, their descendants were viewed as Egyptians by the Roman rulers, despite their own self-perception of being Greek. The portraits represent both descendants of ancient Greek mercenaries, who had fought for Alexander the Great, settled in Egypt and married local women,[13] as well as native Egyptians who were the majority, many of whom had adopted Greek or Latin names, then seen as 'status symbols'.[18][19][20][21] A DNA study shows genetic continuity between the Pre-Ptolemaic, Ptolemaic and Roman populations of Egypt, indicating that foreign rule impacted Egypt's population only to a very limited degree at the genetic level.[22]
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
Another Egyptian video about Netflix Cleopatra. The video puts forward the thesis that Jada Pinkett Smith promotes the idea that African Americans, and not Egyptians, are the true descendants of the ancient Egyptians.
Another thing many youtubers are misleading with is the word greek and what that meant doing greek egypt.
When someone say greek at time of hellenistic egypt,they were not only white and greek greek. Heck even in greece there were non white greeks even before alexander,but of course there were not the majority.
Egyptian Greeks
quote:
The Egyptian Greeks, also known as Egyptiotes (Greek: Αιγυπτιώτες), or simply Greeks in Egypt, are the ethnic Greek community from Egypt that has existed from the Hellenistic period until the aftermath of the Egyptian coup d'état of 1952, when most were forced to leave.
Coptic Greeks
quote: It is estimated that as much as 30 percent of the population of Faiyum was Greek during the Ptolemaic period, with the rest being native Egyptians;[14] the Faiyum mummy portraits reflect the complex synthesis of the predominant Egyptian culture and that of the elite Greek minority in Faiyum.[14]
By the Roman period, much of the "Greek" population of Faiyum was made up of either Hellenized Egyptians or people of mixed Egyptian-Greek origins,[15] and by the time of Roman emperor Caracalla in the 2nd century AD, ethnic Egyptians could be distinguished from Egyptian Greeks by their speech.[16]
Egyptian Greek is the variety of Greek spoken in Egypt from antiquity until the Islamic conquest of Egypt in the 7th century. Egyptian Greek adopted many loanwords from Coptic Egyptian; there was a great deal of intracommunity bilingualism in Egypt.[17][18]
According to Walker, early Ptolemaic Greek colonists married local women and adopted Egyptian religious beliefs, and by Roman times, their descendants were viewed as Egyptians by the Roman rulers, despite their own self-perception of being Greek.[19] The dental morphology[20] of the Roman-period Faiyum mummies was also compared with that of earlier Egyptian populations, and was found to be "much more closely akin" to that of ancient Egyptians than to Greeks or other European populations.[21] Victor J. Katz notes that "research in papyri dating from the early centuries of the common era demonstrates that a significant amount of intermarriage took place between the Greek and Egyptian communities".[22]
wikipedia
Posted by Firewall (Member # 20331) on :
There were greeks living in egypt by the way before the greek invasion.
Egyptian Greeks
Antiquity Greeks have been present in Egypt since at least the 7th century BC. Herodotus visited ancient Egypt in the 5th century BC and claimed that the Greeks were one of the first groups of foreigners that ever lived there.[7] Diodorus Siculus claimed that Rhodian Actis, one of the Heliadae, built the city of Heliopolis before the cataclysm; likewise the Athenians built Sais. Siculus reports that all the Greek cities were destroyed during the cataclysm, but the Egyptian cities including Heliopolis and Sais survived.[8]
First historical colonies According to Herodotus (ii. 154), King Psammetichus I (664–610 BC) established a garrison of foreign mercenaries at Daphnae, mostly Carians and Ionian Greeks.
In 7th century BC, after the Greek Dark Ages from 1100 to 750 BC, the city of Naucratis was founded in Ancient Egypt. It was located on the Canopic branch of the Nile river, 45 mi (72 km) from the open sea. It was the first and, for much of its early history, the only permanent Greek colony in Egypt; acting as a symbiotic nexus for the interchange of Greek and Egyptian art and culture.
At about the same time, the city of Heracleion, the closest to the sea, became an important port for Greek trade. It had a famous temple of Heracles. The city later sank into the sea, only to be rediscovered recently.
From the time of Psammetichus I onwards, Greek mercenary armies played an important role in some of the Egyptian wars. One such army was led by Mentor of Rhodes. Another such personage was Phanes of Halicarnassus.
Today
Today the Greek community numbers officially about 5,000 people,[27] with independent estimates ranging to 60,000.[6] Many of Greek origin are now counted as Egyptian, having changed their nationality. In Alexandria, apart from the Patriarchate, there is a Patriarchal theology school that opened recently after 480 years being closed. Saint Nicholas church in Cairo and several other buildings in Alexandria have been recently renovated by the Greek Government and the Alexander S. Onassis Foundation. Saint George's church in Old Cairo is undergoing restoration to end in 2014. During the last decade, there has been a new interest from the Egyptian government for a diplomatic rapprochement with Greece and this has positively affected the Greek Diaspora. The Diaspora has received official visits of many Greek politicians. Economic relationships between Greece and Egypt have expanded. As of 2010, Egypt has received major Greek investments in banking, tourism, paper, the oil industry, & many others. In 2009, a five-year cooperation-memorandum was signed among the NCSR Demokritos Institute in Agia Paraskevi, Athens and the University of Alexandria, regarding Archeometry research and contextual sectors.[28]
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
The Lady of the Library (Cinzia DuBois) tries to sort out the intricacies of the Ptolemaic family history. Not totally uncomplicated.
Not only are most movies featuring the ancient Nile made by Westerners, but so are most of the documentaries about the ancient Nile. And almost all of those documentaries promote white washed historical Nile Valley figures. So to act so outraged about this one documentary when there are literally dozens of documentaries produced in the West that are no less historic fabrications, is beyond hypocritical. It is like saying, that them doing historical fiction in a documentary with actors from Europe and elsewhere is fine, but let someone black do it and outrage......
Also what happened to the movie Will Packer was doing on Queen Amanarenas? It also seems odd that for all this talk about black history, black Americans and Africans seem to be dragging their feet on actually producing anything of their own on it. Its not like there are no film makers in Africa.
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
Otherwise it seems that ancient Egyptians mostly have been depicted with dark skin in cartoons, like these ones
Black Sands - USA
La Reine Soleil - France
The Black Pharaoh, the Savage and the Princess - France
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
Danny Glover once planned a film about Haitian freedom fighter Toussaint Louverture, but it seems the movie has not materialized yet.
quote: Glover sought to make a film biography of Toussaint Louverture for his directorial debut. In May 2006, the film had included cast members Wesley Snipes, Angela Bassett, Don Cheadle, Jonathan Rhys Meyers, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Roger Guenveur Smith, Mos Def, Isaach de Bankolé, and Richard Bohringer. Production, estimated to cost $30 million, was planned to begin in Poland, filming from late 2006 into early 2007.
In May 2007, President of Venezuela Hugo Chávez contributed $18 million to fund the production of Toussaint for Glover, who was a prominent U.S. supporter of Chávez. The contribution annoyed some Venezuelan filmmakers, who said the money could have funded other homegrown films and that Glover's film was not even about Venezuela.
In April 2008, the Venezuelan National Assembly authorized an additional $9,840,505 for Glover's film, which is still in planning.
In 2015, Glover gave an update on the Toussaint project, stating, "The film that we always missed is a movie on the Haitian revolution and Toussaint Louverture. The company is fortuitously named after him and that was the movie that I wanted to do. We’ve developed a script. We thought we were going to get it done four years ago. We thought we were going to be making it right now. But also there are other kinds of things that intrigue me.
quote: Toussaint Louverture [tusɛ̃ luvɛʁtyʁ] is a 2012 French film written and directed by Philippe Niang. It stars Jimmy Jean-Louis, Aïssa Maïga and Sonia Rolland and is based on the life of Toussaint Louverture.
The film premiered at the 2012 Festival de Luchon. It won the Best Diaspora Feature award at the 8th Africa Movie Academy Awards.
Philip Niang - Director of Toussaint Louverture
Posted by Firewall (Member # 20331) on :
By the way the african queen series is a Docudrama,not a documentary.Folks need to read more carefully on what it is.
Documentary vs Docudrama While documentaries primarily involve the formation of perceptual beliefs, docudramas invite us to form nonperceptual beliefs by primarily involving the formation of perceptual imaginings. That is why docudramas are not documentaries.
African Queens Expert interviews and other documentary content with premium scripted docudrama about different queens. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt15305648/
African Queens (TV series) African Queens is a 2023 docudrama focusing on female monarchs, airing on the streaming service Netflix. The series is produced and narrated by Jada Pinkett Smith and features dramatized fictional re-enactments as well as interviews with experts. The first season covers Njinga, Queen of Ndongo and Matamba, and is directed by Ethosheia Hylton. The second season focuses on Queen of the Ptolemaic Kingdom of Egypt, Pharaoh Cleopatra VII Philopator, and is directed by Tina Gharavi. Wikipedia
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by Firewall: By the way the african queen series is a Docudrama,not a documentary.Folks need to read more carefully on what it is.
Documentary vs Docudrama While documentaries primarily involve the formation of perceptual beliefs, docudramas invite us to form nonperceptual beliefs by primarily involving the formation of perceptual imaginings. That is why docudramas are not documentaries.
African Queens Expert interviews and other documentary content with premium scripted docudrama about different queens. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt15305648/
African Queens (TV series) African Queens is a 2023 docudrama focusing on female monarchs, airing on the streaming service Netflix. The series is produced and narrated by Jada Pinkett Smith and features dramatized fictional re-enactments as well as interviews with experts. The first season covers Njinga, Queen of Ndongo and Matamba, and is directed by Ethosheia Hylton. The second season focuses on Queen of the Ptolemaic Kingdom of Egypt, Pharaoh Cleopatra VII Philopator, and is directed by Tina Gharavi. Wikipedia
But the situation with IMDb and Netflix is the same They both classify and list Cleopatra and Njinga as documentaries that also have docudrama content
All the Netflix Cleopatra posters, say on them
"A NETFLIX DOCUMENTARY"
not even mentioning "docudrama"
in the video trailer, 15 seconds in, for Queen Njinga it says
"A NETFLIX DOCUMENTARY SERIES"
It says the same on the Cleopatra trailer, 6 seconds in
"A NETFLIX DOCUMENTARY SERIES"
________________________________
A documentary film or documentary is a non-fictional motion-picture intended to "document reality, primarily for the purposes of instruction, education or maintaining a historical record"
Docudrama (or documentary drama) is a genre of television and film, which features dramatized re-enactments of actual events.
A docuseriesis a documentary in parts
_____________________________
Netflix is presenting and classifying AFRICAN QUEENS as docuseries documentaries
-Including both narration and experts commenting in non-dramatized documentary format in combination with docudrama acting
Posted by Tazarah (Member # 23365) on :
Lioness why are you no longer a mod
Posted by Yatunde Lisa Bey (Member # 22253) on :
quote:Originally posted by Tazarah: Lioness why are you no longer a mod
Because the old "Lioness" quit, this is a different person behind this "lioness" persona
Posted by Tazarah (Member # 23365) on :
Lmao!
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
----
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
---
Posted by Archeopteryx (Member # 23193) on :
quote:Originally posted by Firewall: Cleopatra Netflix(Ancient Egyptians) hamiticevropa9899367
This YouTuber (@ShezmuOperative) calls himself a Hamite. He seems to have some negative obsession with Nora (Kemet Queen). So far he has made seven videos where he, among other things, calls her a liar. He also thinks that she and most other modern Egyptians should be expelled from Egypt and Africa. On top of that he also see todays Berbers in North Africa as imposters.