...
EgyptSearch Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» EgyptSearch Forums » Deshret » West Eurasian admixture in Eurafricans

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: West Eurasian admixture in Eurafricans
Perahu
On Vacation
Member # 18548

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Perahu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Egyptians: ~83% West Eurasian, ~17% Sub-Saharan African
Northwest Africans: ~77% West Eurasian, ~23% Sub-Saharan African
Ethiopians: ~53% West Eurasian, ~45% Sub-Saharan African, ~2% South Asian

Per Behar et al. 2010

See image below (Red is Sub-Saharan African):
 -

Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
adrianne
Member
Member # 10761

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for adrianne     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
this just proves alot of modern egyptians ethiopians etc etc have mixed dna. since they have been invaded throughout their history.


before they were invaded they look like this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Huni-StatueHead_BrooklynMuseum.png

you cant refute this

Posts: 164 | Registered: Apr 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Perahu
On Vacation
Member # 18548

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Perahu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The modern and ancient populations of those places are practically identical.

They are very closely located to Eurasia, one should not expect them to be purely African.

Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
adrianne
Member
Member # 10761

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for adrianne     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
3rd dynasty RULER

Q.why did the EARLY rulers look like this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Huni-StatueHead_BrooklynMuseum.png

A.?

Posts: 164 | Registered: Apr 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Calabooz '
Member
Member # 18238

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Calabooz '   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
First of all, what is the name of this study? Given your history of distorting and misinterpreting these things, you need to post a link to the article.

--------------------
L Writes:

Posts: 1502 | From: Dies Irae | Registered: Oct 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Gaul
Member
Member # 16198

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for The Gaul     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Calabooz':
First of all, what is the name of this study? Given your history of distorting and misinterpreting these things, you need to post a link to the article.

Many of these studies make the mistake of treating Ethiopia as a monotonous block, a nation of 85 million people and multiple ethnic groups. Most of them are unaware of the very nations they claim to study. Wouldn't surprise me if it's direct quotes at all.
Posts: 455 | From: Tharsis Montes | Registered: Jan 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Perahu
On Vacation
Member # 18548

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Perahu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Calabooz':
First of all, what is the name of this study? Given your history of distorting and misinterpreting these things, you need to post a link to the article.

Genome-wide structure of Jews (Behar et al. 2010)

Review of study by Dienekes

Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Calabooz '
Member
Member # 18238

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Calabooz '   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Ethiopians: ~53% West Eurasian, ~45% Sub-Saharan African, ~2% South Asian
What the hell?

"To facilitate extraction of PCs capturing genetic variation specific
to West Eurasia we excluded populations showing clear membership in **NON-West Eurasian**
genetic components (Yemenites, Saudi Arabians, Ethiopian Jews, and Indian Jews)."

So explain to me where you got your 53% West Eurasian?

quote:
Egyptians: ~83% West Eurasian, ~17% Sub-Saharan African
Northwest Africans: ~77% West Eurasian, ~23% Sub-Saharan African

Again, I don't know where you're coming up with this:


"Populations of the Caucasus, flanked by Cypriots, form an almost uninterrupted rim that separates the bulk of Europeans from Middle Eastern populations. Bedouins, Jordanians, Palestinians and Saudi Arabians are located in close proximity to each other, which is consistent with a common origin in the Arabian Peninsula25, whereas the Egyptian, Moroccan, Mozabite Berber, and Yemenite samples are located **closer to sub-Saharan populations (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 2a).**"


"**The Bantu, rather than San/Pygmy specific signal (discernable at K=6) has similar prevalence
among the Ethiopian Jews5, Semitic-speaking Tigreans and Amharas, but is slightly more
frequent among the Cushitic-speaking Oromos**
(Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. 4). Presence of
**sub-Saharan specific component in Moroccans and Egyptians, extending to the near-by
populations of the Near East and Arabia, is evident and consistent with a previous report for
Algerian Mozabite Berbers, Bedouins, and Palestinians1**
. The main differences between Europe
and the Middle East are quantitative, rather than qualitative. At K=4, a correlation matrix
reproduces the uniformity of West Eurasia, and the split into the Middle Eastern and European
gene pools is evident at K=8 (Supplementary Fig. 5a). Note that Cyprus, assigned formally
within Europe, coincides with Levantine, not European populations.



Perahu is simply in denial of the substantial African gene flow into West Eurasians and that they are a hybrid populations so he wants to make the same true for Africans as well

Posts: 1502 | From: Dies Irae | Registered: Oct 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Perahu
On Vacation
Member # 18548

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Perahu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You must be colorblind.

Please see the chart in the OP, extracted from the K=8 image.

Yes, certain North Africans and Middle Easterners have Sub-Saharan admixture, but it is not much (see Red Cluster in the OP image).

There's a strong West Eurasian component in Hamitic Eurafricans (between ~85% to ~50%).

Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Calabooz '
Member
Member # 18238

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Calabooz '   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
You must be colorblind.

Please see the chart in the OP, extracted from the K=8 image.

Yes, certain North Africans and Middle Easterners have Sub-Saharan admixture, but it is not much (see Red Cluster in the OP image).

Strong West Eurasian admixture in Hamitic Eurafricans (between ~85% to ~50%).

Just to say, Autosomal results are not as good for inferring ancient population structure because they are so unstable as opposed to uni-parental markers
Posts: 1502 | From: Dies Irae | Registered: Oct 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Perahu
On Vacation
Member # 18548

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Perahu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Calabooz':
Perahu is simply in denial of the substantial African gene flow into West Eurasians and that they are a hybrid populations so he wants to make the same true for Africans as well

Not true.

Most African Negroids are 100% African, just look at the scores of the Mandenkas (arguably the most Northern authentic Negroids).

I only claimed Hamitic Eurafricans are heavily mixed.

Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Perahu
On Vacation
Member # 18548

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Perahu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Calabooz':
lol you dumbass. You claimed this:

quote:
~83% West Eurasian, ~17% Sub-Saharan African
But as the authors from the full text, which I'm guessing you haven't even read, say, the Egyptian and Northwest Africans cluster CLOSER TO SUB-SAHARAN AFRICANS. Which is in stark contrast to the other groups so how can they be a majority west Eurasian if they are CLOSER to sub-Saharan Africans?
Seriously, what the **** is wrong with you.

They cluster closer to Africans compared to 100% Eurasians from West Asia like the Georgians and Turks. THIS DOES NOT MEAN THEY ARE CLOSER TO SUB-SAHARAN AFRICANS THAN TO WEST ASIANS DUMBFUCK.

I'm dealing with retards here, jeez!

Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Calabooz '
Member
Member # 18238

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Calabooz '   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Seriously, what the **** is wrong with you.

They cluster closer to Africans compared to 100% Eurasians from West Asia like the Georgians and Turks. THIS DOES NOT MEAN THEY ARE CLOSER TO SUB-SAHARAN AFRICANS THAN TO WEST ASIANS DUMBFUCK.

I'm dealing with retards here, jeez!

Oh, they don't consider East Africa as sub-Saharan in this article...

--------------------
L Writes:

Posts: 1502 | From: Dies Irae | Registered: Oct 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Perahu
On Vacation
Member # 18548

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Perahu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Calabooz':
Just to say, Autosomal results are not as good for inferring ancient population structure because they are so unstable as opposed to uni-parental markers

***Weak***

VERY WEAK argument.

Uni-parental markers only represent <0.01% of someone's genetic make-up, IT DOES *NOT* CODE FOR PHENOTYPE. While Autosomal represents >99% of someone's genetic make-up, and DOES CODE FOR PHENOTYPE.

Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Calabooz '
Member
Member # 18238

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Calabooz '   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
***Weak***

VERY WEAK argument.

? It's not even an argument, nor is it debatable.

On the other hand, if this indicated gene flow, would it not show up on mtDNA and yDNA results as well? Probably.


quote:
Uni-parental markers only represent <0.01% of someone's genetic make-up, IT DOES *NOT* CODE FOR PHENOTYPE. While Autosomal represents >99% of someone's genetic make-up, and DOES CODE FOR PHENOTYPE.
Yes, we all know autosomes are correlated with phenotype. So, what's your point?

--------------------
L Writes:

Posts: 1502 | From: Dies Irae | Registered: Oct 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Perahu
On Vacation
Member # 18548

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Perahu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
mitochondrial and NRY data represent only an extremely small portion of the whole genome (<0.01%) and are particularly ***susceptible to the effects of genetic drift***. Autosomal DNA is far more useful in population genetics.
Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Djehuti
Member
Member # 6698

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Djehuti     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
^ This coming from the idiot who claims Bantu Tutsi and Hima and Nilo-Saharan Hema as "Eurasian mixed", as well as referring to Pontikos as "Doctor"! LMAO [Big Grin]
Posts: 26252 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Perahu
On Vacation
Member # 18548

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Perahu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Djehuti:
^ This coming from the idiot who claims Bantu Tutsi and Hima and Nilo-Saharan Hema as "Eurasian mixed", as well as referring to Pontikos as "Doctor"! LMAO [Big Grin]

Notice that there are two Bantu samples from Kenya in my chart with roughly 10% West Eurasian DNA.

Most of the Bantu are pure though, so are the West Africans.

Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Calabooz '
Member
Member # 18238

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Calabooz '   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
mitochondrial and NRY data represent only a small portion of the whole genome (<0.01%) and are particularly ***susceptible to the effects of genetic drift***.
Lol... of course. But we can still estimate how long a haplogroup has been in a region on intra-phylogenetic variation. Not to mention they are non-recombining. As mentioned when we discussed the Tishkoff article, the East African position is not the result of admixture but rather greater African vs. non-African diversity. On the other hand, if it were indicating gene flow, uni-parental markers would pick up on this too, don't ya think? In the case of East Africans, "Simple admixture models are less likely"


quote:
Notice that there are two Bantu samples from Kenya in my chart with roughly 10% West Eurasian DNA.
Didn't Sundjata go over this with you in regards to Tishkoff et al.?
Posts: 1502 | From: Dies Irae | Registered: Oct 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Perahu
On Vacation
Member # 18548

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Perahu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The author (Behar) considers the blue and light green clusters to be West Eurasian.

Egyptians: ~83% West Eurasian
Northwest Africans: ~77% West Eurasian
Ethiopians: ~53% West Eurasian


Makes perfect sense.

Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Calabooz '
Member
Member # 18238

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Calabooz '   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
As stated by Tishkoff et al. the East African structure is ancestral. No point in going down that road again, I'm done.

PS. Sorry for the mistakes, been up the past 24hours 0_0

--------------------
L Writes:

Posts: 1502 | From: Dies Irae | Registered: Oct 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Elijah The Tishbite
Member
Member # 10328

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Elijah The Tishbite     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Perahu:
quote:
Originally posted by Calabooz':
First of all, what is the name of this study? Given your history of distorting and misinterpreting these things, you need to post a link to the article.

Genome-wide structure of Jews (Behar et al. 2010)

Review of study by Dienekes

No, apparently you are a dumb ape that cannot understand studies, have you taken the time to read the supplemental data in that study? I don't have the full text at my hands right now, I'm at work, but it never makes the dumb claims that you made. Stupid monkeytard!
Posts: 2595 | From: Vicksburg | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Elijah The Tishbite
Member
Member # 10328

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Elijah The Tishbite     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Perahu:
The author (Behar) considers the blue and light green clusters to be West Eurasian.

Egyptians: ~83% West Eurasian
Northwest Africans: ~77% West Eurasian
Ethiopians: ~53% West Eurasian


Makes perfect sense.

Where in the study does Behar makes those claims, please point out where ape?

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v466/n7303/extref/nature09103-s1.pdf

Read supplementary note 3 in that PDF you monkeytard and tell me how it relates to your stupidity.

Posts: 2595 | From: Vicksburg | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Perahu
On Vacation
Member # 18548

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Perahu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by .Charlie Bass.:
No, appraently you are a dumb ape that cannot understand studies, have you taken the time to read the supplemental data in that study? I don't have the full text at my hands right now, I'm at work, but it never makes the dumb claims that you made. Stupid monkeytard!

You know, you sound like you have Tourette's Syndrome. [Big Grin]

Look at the West Eurasian clusters present in all the Eurafricans.

Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Elijah The Tishbite
Member
Member # 10328

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Elijah The Tishbite     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Perahu:
quote:
Originally posted by .Charlie Bass.:
No, appraently you are a dumb ape that cannot understand studies, have you taken the time to read the supplemental data in that study? I don't have the full text at my hands right now, I'm at work, but it never makes the dumb claims that you made. Stupid monkeytard!

You know, you sound like you have Tourette's Syndrome. [Big Grin]

Look at the West Eurasian clusters present in all the Eurafricans.

Monkey read the supplementary data before you speak. Your interpreatation of colors is retarded because the study makes no assumptions that you make, you simply parrots those apes from Dienekes blog and anthroscape who don't understand studies themselves.
Posts: 2595 | From: Vicksburg | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Perahu
On Vacation
Member # 18548

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Perahu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You are unable to think for yourself.
Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
alTakruri
Member
Member # 10195

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for alTakruri   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Behar relies on Dienekes to make the statements
that he as a known professional geneticist with
a car$$r at stake cannot forthrightly say for
himself. I gather this from Behar going on
record in Nature in praise of Dienekes.

--------------------
Intellectual property of YYT al~Takruri © 2004 - 2017. All rights reserved.

Posts: 8014 | From: the Tekrur in the Western Sahel | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Elijah The Tishbite
Member
Member # 10328

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Elijah The Tishbite     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Perahu:
You are unable to think for yourself.

Thats why you're parroting Dienekes and Racial Retardology and can't read for yourself, yeah right homo chimpus erectus apeus.
Posts: 2595 | From: Vicksburg | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Sundjata
Member
Member # 13096

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Sundjata     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
^lol

--------------------
mr.writer.asa@gmail.com

Posts: 4021 | From: Bay Area, CA | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Perahu
On Vacation
Member # 18548

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Perahu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by .Charlie Bass.:
quote:
Originally posted by Perahu:
You are unable to think for yourself.

Thats why you're parroting Dienekes and Racial Retardology and can't read for yourself, yeah right homo chimpus erectus apeus.
Charlie

You are nearly two times more African than the average Ethiopian. [Big Grin]

Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Elijah The Tishbite
Member
Member # 10328

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Elijah The Tishbite     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Perahu:
quote:
Originally posted by .Charlie Bass.:
quote:
Originally posted by Perahu:
You are unable to think for yourself.

Thats why you're parroting Dienekes and Racial Retardology and can't read for yourself, yeah right homo chimpus erectus apeus.
Charlie

You are nearly two times more African than the average Ethiopian. [Big Grin]

You are nearly 100 times more ape than the average gorilla. Ethiopians are more "African" than I am because they are Africans you monkeytard.
Posts: 2595 | From: Vicksburg | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Djehuti
Member
Member # 6698

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Djehuti     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
^ Of course. When the very FACT that ancient Egyptians were indigenous Africans and thus related to other Africans cannot be denied, the next logical or rather illogical step would be to make other Africans "Eurasian caca-soids" as well. Thus peoples from Ethiopians and even Bantus become "Eurasian". It's funny, that Anglo-Pyramidiot and DaDumHo seem to be purposely ignoring this fact. I'm sure they see this idiocy that Paironuts writes but they purposely do not make the connection. [Wink]
Posts: 26252 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Perahu
On Vacation
Member # 18548

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Perahu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by .Charlie Bass.:
You are nearly 100 times more ape than the average gorilla. Ethiopians are more "African" than I am because they are Africans you monkeytard.

You are biologically more African than them.
Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Elijah The Tishbite
Member
Member # 10328

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Elijah The Tishbite     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Perahu:
quote:
Originally posted by .Charlie Bass.:
You are nearly 100 times more ape than the average gorilla. Ethiopians are more "African" than I am because they are Africans you monkeytard.

You are biologically more African than them.
Um no, they are Africans you ape, I am not, biologically they're connected to other Africans more than I am.
Posts: 2595 | From: Vicksburg | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Perahu
On Vacation
Member # 18548

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Perahu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by .Charlie Bass.:
Um no, they are Africans you ape, I am not, biologically they're connected to other Africans more than I am.

Ethiopians are several times closer to pure North Europeans than you are. [Roll Eyes]
Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Calabooz '
Member
Member # 18238

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Calabooz '   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
^Sure, if that makes you feel better.


But the reality is that their shared cluster with West Eurasians is consistent with their OOA status and not due to admixture.


Question: Who came first, Africans or Western Eurasians?


Then we still have the fact of the substantial gene flow into West Eurasia from Africa

--------------------
L Writes:

Posts: 1502 | From: Dies Irae | Registered: Oct 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Perahu
On Vacation
Member # 18548

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Perahu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Ethiopians have experienced admixture events with West Eurasians (maternally between 30% to 60% macrohaplogroup M and N and paternally between 15% to 50% macrohaplogroup F).
Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Perahu
On Vacation
Member # 18548

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Perahu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Eurasian mtDNA in Ethiopians

 -

Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Calabooz '
Member
Member # 18238

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Calabooz '   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
^Source for image?


Also, it's debatable whether or not haplogroups M and N had Asian origins. What's your reference in regards to haplogroup F?


On the other hand, am I now allowed to say that African genes in Europeans make them part Negroid LOL!

Edited" Meant to say Asian not African

Posts: 1502 | From: Dies Irae | Registered: Oct 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
the lioness,
Member
Member # 17353

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for the lioness,     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by adrianne:
[QB] 3rd dynasty RULER

Q.why did the EARLY rulers look like this

 -

Somebody broke off his nose because when you break the nose off a statue it looks blacker.
Probably broken off by Taharqa's men

Posts: 42930 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Elijah The Tishbite
Member
Member # 10328

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Elijah The Tishbite     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Perahu:
quote:
Originally posted by .Charlie Bass.:
Um no, they are Africans you ape, I am not, biologically they're connected to other Africans more than I am.

Ethiopians are several times closer to pure North Europeans than you are. [Roll Eyes]
And Europeans are intermediate between Africans and Asians but closer to Africans, your point being monkey? Ethiopians are still biologically more African than African Americans.
Posts: 2595 | From: Vicksburg | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Perahu
On Vacation
Member # 18548

Rate Member
Icon 10 posted      Profile for Perahu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by .Charlie Bass.:
And Europeans are intermediate between Africans and Asians but closer to Africans

Negrocentric liar.

 -

---- Reich et al. 2010

Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Calabooz '
Member
Member # 18238

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Calabooz '   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
^The divergences in that figure are caused by sequencing error. Read it again

--------------------
L Writes:

Posts: 1502 | From: Dies Irae | Registered: Oct 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Perahu
On Vacation
Member # 18548

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Perahu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You don't even know what the f' you are talking about. Errors mainly concerned the ancient hominid samples (processed and aligned differently, despite this Papuans were still closest to the Denisova), it had little to no impact on the AMH samples.

Europeans are not closer to Africans according to the latest complete genome data.

Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Calabooz '
Member
Member # 18238

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Calabooz '   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
^Believe what you want. But you were refuted on the same study here along with the issue of divergence times. I'm just going to let this thread die now...
Posts: 1502 | From: Dies Irae | Registered: Oct 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | EgyptSearch!

(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3