posted

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by castrated-mind:

- Caucasians can range in skin colour, from pale white, to a ruddy pink, to an olive complexion. The Mediterraneans are mostly olive skinned.

---

quote:

---

- Skeletal evidence has classified the ancestors of the Sumerians (from the Ubaid, Uruk, and Jemdet Nasr periods) as Caucasians, mostly of the Mediterranean sub-race. See link for details - http://carnby.altervista.org/troe/04-03.htm

---

quote:

---

- There was also a Nordic ruling elite among the lower classes who were predominately Mediterranean, just like in ancient egypt.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Abozo the FAKE Egyptian Russo-Persian Dickhead:

---

posted

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by castrated-mind:

Science (forensics, physical anthropology, genetics etc) has proven different races exist.

The only people who deny races exist are:

1. Liberals
2. Multiculturalists/multiracialists

Basically race-denialism is only believed by a few sad individuals who have a socio-political agenda. In the case of most Afrocentrics, they deny race exists because they are living in countries founded by white people, so they need a reason to justify why they are living in white lands.

---

posted

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by cassiterides:
please see thread where i define this for you...

---

posted

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Djehuti:
^ Yes but remember you are dealing with a dumb scientifically illiterate mind. The only "science" he's read are outdated Carleton Coon books. LOL

In the meantime let us ponder over the whiteness of the Sumerians, shall we?





LOL

---

According to Djehuti both of the following are Black people






LOL [Big Grin]
 

posted

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Brada-Anansi:
They called themselves Sagigga the Black headed ones I do not claim they were culturally Africans but Blacks they were according to how they self describe and how some describe them.

---

quote:

---

And "Kush" begat Nimrod and he became a mighty one upon the earth and the begining of his kingdom was in Shinnar.(Sumer?) Now if Ham/Kham was black and his sons Misr, Kush,Phut(Punt?)all located in Africa were blacks also,then Kush's son is responsible for the rise of Babylon,in the sense that Sumer was the insparation for the rise of Babylon.

---

quote:

---

And before some one says they were talking about heir note they were in a land populated by black haired folks to this day.

---

Again, unless you are willing to say they were two-toned people, you are flat out wrong. They had black hair compared to the gods they worshiped.

Here is an example of the painstaking length they went to to capture the black hair of the sumerians ...



Notice how they paint the hair BLACK and neglect to paint the rest of the idol flesh tone color.
 

posted

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by the lyingass:

According to Djehuti both of the following are Black people






LOL [Big Grin]

---

Again with the lying and putting words in my mouth. What's the matter? The complexion of the Sumerians too dark for ya high-yella mullata ass? LOL
 

posted

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Djehuti:
^ Yes but remember you are dealing with a dumb scientifically illiterate mind. The only "science" he's read are outdated Carleton Coon books. LOL

In the meantime let us ponder over the whiteness of the Sumerians, shall we?





LOL

---

posted

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Truthcentric:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Djehuti:
^ Yes but remember you are dealing with a dumb scientifically illiterate mind. The only "science" he's read are outdated Carleton Coon books. LOL

In the meantime let us ponder over the whiteness of the Sumerians, shall we?





LOL

---

Good find, Djehuti! And here I was wondering if Mesopotamians ever painted themselves the way Egyptians did (most Mesopotamian art I have seen prior to this is not very colorful).

Say, would you call the people in these frescoes "black"? They do seem slightly darker than modern Iraqis.

---

posted

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Afrocentric Liars Exposed:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Brada-Anansi:
They called themselves Sagigga the Black headed ones I do not claim they were culturally Africans but Blacks they were according to how they self describe and how some describe them.

---

Come on dude, use some critical thinking. If they were described as merely black headed ones, does that mean they were two-tone flesh beings? Get real dude... Black headed is reference to their black hair. Sumerians contrasted themselves to their gods, the fair hair, eyes and skin people.

quote:

---

And "Kush" begat Nimrod and he became a mighty one upon the earth and the begining of his kingdom was in Shinnar.(Sumer?) Now if Ham/Kham was black and his sons Misr, Kush,Phut(Punt?)all located in Africa were blacks also,then Kush's son is responsible for the rise of Babylon,in the sense that Sumer was the insparation for the rise of Babylon.

---

Another common mistake by Afrocentrists. Kush was used to denote two places in the bible, one in Africa and one in fertile crescent (Kish). The one spoken of in Genesis refers to Kish of Mesopatamia, not Africa, you numbnut!

quote:

---

And before some one says they were talking about heir note they were in a land populated by black haired folks to this day.

---

Again, unless you are willing to say they were two-toned people, you are flat out wrong. They had black hair compared to the gods they worshiped.

Here is an example of the painstaking length they went to to capture the black hair of the sumerians ...



Notice how they paint the hair BLACK and neglect to paint the rest of the idol flesh tone color.

---

posted

---

To the lying dummy, the boy above is technically not black since his complexion is very light. He is only labeled so for political reasons, namely that he has black ancestry. This all due to the political "one-drop rule" so whites can maintain the illusion of purity whereas blacks are the ones who are being 'mongrelized' so to speak. Of course that is the political policy followed in America. It is different elsewhere especially in Africa, where it is the opposite-- where having any visible white ancestry makes one 'white'.

Of course this has no bearing on technical terms where indigenous or relatively pure Africans with their very dark complexions would obviously be labeled as BLACK, and so would some Asians indigenous to tropical and subtropical regions such as apparently the Sumerians.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Truthcentric:

Good find, Djehuti! And here I was wondering if Mesopotamians ever painted themselves the way Egyptians did (most Mesopotamian art I have seen prior to this is not very colorful).

Say, would you call the people in these frescoes "black"? They do seem slightly darker than modern Iraqis.

---

posted

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Brada-Anansi:

Bullsh!!t!! this is from his own link

 
The head (left) and leg (right) of a naturally made mummy found in 2004 display "salt-cured" skin and yellowish hair after spending centuries in an Iranian salt mine. The remains belong to one of five mummies found in the mine between 1993 and 2005. Last month an international team announced the discovery of a sixth salt man from the mine, and the experts say more could eventually be unearthed.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/bigphotos/3020824.html
In any case these are Iranians and some did came from the steeps they they were once called the;
Martu We have a description of the Martu: roughly in English, as quoted “The Martu, who knows no grain, the Martu who knows no house nor town, the slob of the mountains ... the Martu who digs up truffles ... who eats raw meat, who has no house during his lifetime, who is not buried after his death ...”
http://tao-dnd.blogspot.com/2009/07/animal-husbandry.html

---

LMAO What do you expect from a desperate loser like Castrated-mind. Of course he would lie! It's what he's been doing all along when he makes claims of Africans never having civilization and Egyptians were never black, etc.