posted
On October 1, 1911, Italy invaded Libya and controlled it until 1943. During the Italian colonial period, about 50% (YES 50%!!) of the Libyan Berber population died in the struggle for independence, mainly in prison camps.
Why no genocide trials, why no cries of crimes against humanity - Oh ya, they were Black people.
Plus killing all of those Black people, made room for all of those Amaizing, or whatever those mixed-race mutts call themselves. It also gave a great opening for the phony Turks-calling-themselves-Arabs like Gaddafi to take over. Now it's the Libyan "Arab" Republic.
All built on rivers of Black blood, and the corpses of how many millions of Berbers. Then Whites have the nerve to ask "so where are all the Blacks of North Africa?"
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: [QB] On October 1, 1911, Italy invaded Libya and controlled it until 1943. During the Italian colonial period, about 50% (YES 50%!!) of the Libyan Berber population died in the struggle for independence, mainly in prison camps.
Why no genocide trials, why no cries of crimes against humanity - Oh ya, they were Black people.
Plus killing all of those Black people, made room for all of those Amaizing, or whatever those mixed-race mutts call themselves. It also gave a great opening for the phony Turks-calling-themselves-Arabs like Gaddafi to take over.
the Ottoman Turks were in control of Libya from 1551 to 1911.
In 1911 Italy attacked the Ottoman controlled Libya claiming to be liberating them from Constantinople's rule. The Italians fought against 20,000 Arabs and 8,000 Turks in this war called the Italo-Turkish War
Posts: 42921 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: On October 1, 1911, Italy invaded Libya and controlled it until 1943. During the Italian colonial period, about 50% (YES 50%!!) of the Libyan Berber population died in the struggle for independence, mainly in prison camps.
Why no genocide trials, why no cries of crimes against humanity - Oh ya, they were Black people.
Plus killing all of those Black people, made room for all of those Amaizing, or whatever those mixed-race mutts call themselves. It also gave a great opening for the phony Turks-calling-themselves-Arabs like Gaddafi to take over. Now it's the Libyan "Arab" Republic.
All built on rivers of Black blood, and the corpses of how many millions of Berbers. Then Whites have the nerve to ask "so where are all the Blacks of North Africa?"
You killed them!
Too bad they were not Jews, then the Lybians would be getting Trillions of Dollars and Pity Party movies every two years..LMAO and claim to be an "opressed minority"...lol
Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: On October 1, 1911, Italy invaded Libya and controlled it until 1943. During the Italian colonial period, about 50% (YES 50%!!) of the Libyan Berber population died in the struggle for independence, mainly in prison camps.
posted
Mike you need to start a reparations campaign for all the Bedouins who died in the camps
Posts: 42921 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by IronLion: ^^Any time they jew you, they always get a response...
Lion, I assume that your lack of empathy is because you have succumbed to the barrage of White and Sand-Nigger bullsh1t propaganda that Berbers are not really Black people.
Well yes, their ancient fondness for White nookie has produced some dilution of the blood.
posted
Mike the Berbers area nomadic people from a wide variety of backgrounds.
You're not in a position to talk about empathy when referring to people, as "sand niggers". Like anguishofbeing is fond of doing, you copy another racist page from the Aryan Nation's handbook.
Posts: 42921 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by IronLion: ^^Any time they jew you, they always get a response...
Lion, I assume that your lack of empathy is because you have succumbed to the barrage of White and Sand-Nigger bullsh1t propaganda that Berbers are not really Black people.
Well yes, their ancient fondness for White nookie has produced some dilution of the blood.
But they were, and still are, a Black people.
...
They may be black. The question is whether they were there at the time of the Romans and the Phoenicians, and the Kemitians.
Tarik Berry and Dana Marniche claim they may have come from Yemen...
Some of the present day Berbers claim a Yemeni origns;
We know many Turkos and Germanos also try to claim Berber origins..
So one has to be careful about who one is talking about and in what time frame!
Lion!
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness: Mike the Berbers area nomadic people from a wide variety of backgrounds.
You're not in a position to talk about empathy when referring to people, as "sand niggers". Like anguishofbeing is fond of doing, you copy another racist page from the Aryan Nation's handbook.
As long as you mean "African" backgrounds, then yes.
BTW - have you noted the position of the "Sand Niggers": i.e. Berbers were NOT Black people, but rather some Hodge-podge of races like them! Those ass-holes deserve every bit of contempt that I have for them.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
^BTW Lioness, I do understand why you take-up for the "Sand Niggers". Don't you pure-Albinos also make the same preposterous claim that you are an original, separate, and unique breed of Humans?
You can run from the Black all you want, but if you want to claim that you are Human, then ya gotta be Black. Whether that be pure, or depigmented Albino, or some mix of the two; it still all comes back to the Black!
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
you know what's hilarious? You are too intimidated and in fear of Jews to even make your own thread about them. I challenged you to do this and you failed. I gave you three days. You are truly a low ranking Nazi errand boy. Apparently your penis is smaller than horsenation's diseased member, hence your anguish, a wannabe. Even melaninking has more balls than you. So paranoid and cowardly. Why ask a black person to go do research on Jews to battle some nobody stormfront member on a website about Egypt? I am not even interested in the subject. When you develop the balls to make your own thread maybe then I'll cut them off for you. Until then curl up in your corner afraid someone is going to google a thread started by an anguished pencil dyk and report you to the Elders of Zion.
Posts: 42921 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ Hey Kitten. In case you missed it, I have already posted several threads exclusively on the wannabes who pretend and call themselves, Jews.
They are after all, the least human of all genetically diseased species on the planet. In those threads, We have shown scientifically and conclusively how European Jew DNA is so screwed up they suffer from serious genetic mortality, as well as serious defective reproductive capability that make them the least numbered group on the planet and due to their melanin deficiencies, the most mentally deranged as well.
I have also posted Henry Ford's excellent book; The International Jew, analysis of The Elders of Zion, which as expected, Jews responded in the usual reactionary manner by demonizing it as, the most Anti-semitic book ever written.
I have failed to notice any valid rebuttal from you of ANY of the data presented in either of these threads.
Posts: 2403 | Registered: Feb 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Farrakhan does sort of thing to get Islamic funds, I know people, it's a racket It's easy to do because there's already peckerwoods like David Duke on the team high fiving behind the scenes It's great though they are going to give us our own blacks only state, "negroville" up in the Yukon. I can't wait until they get us free sterilizations for our help in calling out the defectives. And we can join the HNNC, House Niggers for Nazis Club, it's part of the old boy network.
Posts: 42921 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness: you know what's hilarious? You are too intimidated and in fear of Jews to even make your own thread about them. I challenged you to do this and you failed. I gave you three days. You are truly a low ranking Nazi errand boy. Apparently your penis is smaller than horsenation's diseased member, hence your anguish, a wannabe. Even melaninking has more balls than you. So paranoid and cowardly. Why ask a black person to go do research on Jews to battle some nobody stormfront member on a website about Egypt? I am not even interested in the subject. When you develop the balls to make your own thread maybe then I'll cut them off for you. Until then curl up in your corner afraid someone is going to google a thread started by an anguished pencil dyk and report you to the Elders of Zion.
Speaking of hilarious, intimidated, fear, failure and cowardice...
quote:Originally posted by the lioness: ^^^^mel gibson without the fame and looks
I like how this crazed bitch will take shots in one thread then pull that tired Im a Woman sensitive sh#t in another, lamenting on how we are soo harsh to her. Sadly that manic deppression **** only works on people like King..
Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by MelaninKing: ^ Hey Kitten. In case you missed it, I have already posted several threads exclusively on the wannabes who pretend and call themselves, Jews.
They are after all, the least human of all genetically diseased species on the planet. In those threads, We have shown scientifically and conclusively how European Jew DNA is so screwed up they suffer from serious genetic mortality, as well as serious defective reproductive capability that make them the least numbered group on the planet and due to their melanin deficiencies, the most mentally deranged as well.
I have also posted Henry Ford's excellent book; The International Jew, analysis of The Elders of Zion, which as expected, Jews responded in the usual reactionary manner by demonizing it as, the most Anti-semitic book ever written.
I have failed to notice any valid rebuttal from you of ANY of the data presented in either of these threads.
Yes, the so called Modern "Jews" are really Idumeans who were converted by John Hycraneus. These Albinos can't hide from ME, I know who they are, Josephus exposes them, Paul exposes them, Y-shuah puts these leeches on Blast all throught the New Testament.
These Leeches can't Hide from me, The Pharasees and Scribes(Why do you think Christ targeted mainly them) Herod the Idumian King of Judea, the Khazars(Later to be the "Ashenazi" Jew converted and mix with the so called Sepharic or Idumians) of Pergamos where Satan Seat is:
And to the angel of the church in Pergamos write; These things saith he which hath the sharp sword with two edges; thy works, and where thou dwellest, [even] where Satan's seat
LOL, Christ Knew where these Mother$uckers WERE..LMAO, they can't hide..
Backed up by History(John Hycranus, Josephus, etc)
Backed up by Scripture
Backed up by the words of Y-shuah
Get these Leeches away from us, all blacks, whites, Latinos, and Arabs can all agree on one thing..the Leech that is the So Called Idumean Jew, deport them to Antartica!
Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by IronLion: ^^Any time they jew you, they always get a response...
Lion, I assume that your lack of empathy is because you have succumbed to the barrage of White and Sand-Nigger bullsh1t propaganda that Berbers are not really Black people.
Well yes, their ancient fondness for White nookie has produced some dilution of the blood.
But they were, and still are, a Black people.
...
They may be black. The question is whether they were there at the time of the Romans and the Phoenicians, and the Kemitians.
Tarik Berry and Dana Marniche claim they may have come from Yemen...
Some of the present day Berbers claim a Yemeni origns;
We know many Turkos and Germanos also try to claim Berber origins..
So one has to be careful about who one is talking about and in what time frame!
Lion!
Lion - Knock me over with a feather, you HAVE been brainwashed by the White man and the Sand-niggers!
posted
Lioness, if your point is that there are a bunch of Sand Niggers now in Libya, then da: the thread is about how the Italians killed millions of the Black ones. AFTER the Italians killed off the REAL Berbers and their leader, look who took over!
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
The Egyptians painted the Libyans and showed them not look much different then the Light Skinned people in Libya Now.
What proof is there that the Italians "killed" off most dark Libyans and that is how Libya got light skinned. Also showing a few pics of Black Libyans does not prove anything, There is Blacks in Libya today also.
Peace
Posts: 9651 | From: Reace and Love City. | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: HE! He! He! he missed that point.
xyyman - Surely you are NOT suggesting that Lioness was trying to use that phony picture of these OBVIOUSLY BLACK people, to make-up some stupid lie about the ancient Libyans. No way, she is too smart for that: He he he.
posted
Pappé estimates that between 1928 and 1932 the Italian military "killed half the Bedouin population (directly or through starvation in camps)."
Ilan Pappé, The Modern Middle East.Routledge, 2005, ISBN 0415214092, p. 26
Mike changed the word Bedouin to Berber.
that's not to say there were no Berbers killed.
Killed either in combat or mainly through starvation and disease at a minimum of 80,000 or even up to one third of the Cyrenaican population died (Aran estimates) Some estimates are much less (Italian historians) at a few thousand. The Greeks colonized N Cyrenaica in the 7th cent. B.C., founding numerous settlements. In the mid-1st cent. B.C., Cyrenaica became a Roman province. In A.D. 115–16 there was a large-scale but unsuccessful revolt of Jewish settlers. When Rome was divided (4th cent.) into the Eastern and Western empires, Cyrenaica came under the Byzantines, who, however, exercised little control over the region. In 642 Arab armies conquered Cyrenaica and many Arabs settled in the region from the 9th to 11th cent. The Ottoman Turks captured the area in the mid-16th cent.
Posts: 42921 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Lioness - Bedouin is a term designating ARAB desert dwelling nomads. Ignorant people incorrectly use it to designate desert dwellers as they incorrectly use the term Nubian to designate Blacks.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote: Lion - Knock me over with a feather, you HAVE been brainwashed by the White man and the Sand-niggers!
Mike you are over-impressed by your ill-defined categorizations.
First understand what Berber is before fighting over whether they are blacks or not...
Understand implications of Kabyles claiming that they are Berber; before claiming them as your half-blood children
Analyse first before jumping to hasty, unfounded conclusions. and then you will be on safer grounds.
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: Lioness - Bedouin is a term designating ARAB desert dwelling nomads. Ignorant people incorrectly use it to designate desert dwellers as they incorrectly use the term Nubian to designate Blacks.
If Bedouin is ill-defined, Berber is worse.
Thus you face another symantical pitfall of using ill-defined terms like Berbers, and arguing that it represents some distinct nationality of a certain hue.
Berbers are not the only ones living in North Africa; And there is no monolithic Berber tribe. Different peoples speak the Berber language and no-one yet has the complete history of that tongue.
Berber tribes are related only that they speak the same language. Many of them are far different from each other some of their most hated enemies are actually fellow Berber tribe. Many other different tribes and nationalities live in the desert of Africa... and they were there before the Berbers...
If you have better proof of the Berbers' antiquity on African soil, please produce it.
Lion!
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
IronLion - I really don't understand why you expend such energy dodging a simple question.
You know perfectly well that Berber is just a convenient term used conventionally to designate the original Black African inhabitants of North Africa.
On the Kabyles; what have these Christian Sand-Niggers got to do with anything? Does the fact that they are Christians make them more legitimate than the Muslim Sand-Niggers?
I don't know, but your answers sound strangely Lioness-like. Please tell me you haven't started an internet romance with that flea-bitten feline on the side. If so, please be forewarned that the likely product of such an unholy union could only be, more Jari's and Anguish's, and dare I say, more Lioness's.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
Your attacks on others is baseless. Maybe I was wrong about the Libyans. The pics you posted seem true. I was really going by the Tables of Nations that the Egyptians created to show most of the people that were around there area.
I KNOW that early libyans were shown the same as Egyptians but the table of nation showed them looking like people from Eurasia and we DO know that Libyans were invaded by the sea people.
Also your comment on Kabyles is wrong, where did you hear they were Christians? Thats news to me because I always thought they were muslims.
Peace
Posts: 9651 | From: Reace and Love City. | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
Your attacks on others is baseless. Maybe I was wrong about the Libyans. The pics you posted seem true. I was really going by the Tables of Nations that the Egyptians created to show most of the people that were around there area.
I KNOW that early libyans were shown the same as Egyptians but the table of nation showed them looking like people from Eurasia and we DO know that Libyans were invaded by the sea people.
Also your comment on Kabyles is wrong, where did you hear they were Christians? Thats news to me because I always thought they were muslims.
Peace
the Ottoman Turks were in control of Libya from 1551 to 1911.
In 1911 Italy attacked the Ottoman controlled Libya claiming to be liberating them from Constantinople's rule. The Italians fought against 20,000 Arabs and 8,000 Turks in this war called the Italo-Turkish War
Posts: 42921 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
Your attacks on others is baseless. Maybe I was wrong about the Libyans. The pics you posted seem true. I was really going by the Tables of Nations that the Egyptians created to show most of the people that were around there area.
I KNOW that early libyans were shown the same as Egyptians but the table of nation showed them looking like people from Eurasia and we DO know that Libyans were invaded by the sea people.
Also your comment on Kabyles is wrong, where did you hear they were Christians? Thats news to me because I always thought they were muslims.
Peace
Actually KING, I think that I have every right to be annoyed. At some point posters, except Lioness, need to take responsibility for intelligent posts. You have been told a thousand times that the table-of-nations picture was a fake, yet you still cite it, that's bullsh1t!
Lion is acting weird too. Don't know why he brought up the Kabylia of Algeria. I don't think that even they claim to be African. Everything about them screams Eastern European Albino.
Woman of Kabylia
dana marniche - Pictorial History of BALKAN North Africa: Revealing the Ottoman and Mamluk Impact
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: Actually KING, I think that I have every right to be annoyed. At some point posters, except Lioness, need to take responsibility for intelligent posts. You have been told a thousand times that the table-of-nations picture was a fake, yet you still cite it, that's bullsh1t!
below is the actual temple wall, not an artists illustration from a book
__________________________________________________________^^^^^Libyan see the side lock _________________________________________________________________hanging down
Ottoman War Losses 1911-15
Italy demanded Tripolitania (Libya) and declared war on September 29, 1911. The Ottoman navy could not stop the 50,000 Italians who invaded Tripoli on October 4 nor ship reinforcements. The Ottoman garrison had only 15,000 men, and the Italians gained control of the coast while meeting resistance inland. The CUP accepted a coalition government on September 30 with Said as grand vizier. The Freedom and Accord Party demanded an investigation of the Italian war, but the CUP was still more organized and won the elections again. Major Enver brought about fifty officers by way of Egypt to lead the Arab resistance in Tripolitania. The Italians bombarded the entrance to the Dardanelles in April 1912 and took over Rhodes and the Dodecanese Islands in May. Turks rallied behind the CUP, which gained seats in Said’s cabinet. On November 5 Italy proclaimed their annexation of the Tripolitanian provinces even though they only controlled the coast. The Ottoman empire organized a boycott of Italian goods, and they fought a guerrilla campaign at Derna, Tripoli, Benghazi, and Tobruk. A treaty was finally signed on October 18, 1912; but the resistance continued for twenty years, and the Italians refused to evacuate the Dodecanese.
Posts: 42921 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Lioness - below is the actual temple wall, not an artists illustration from a book. He he, WHERE?
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: Lioness - below is the actual temple wall, not an artists illustration from a book. He he, WHERE?
Tomb of Ramses III KV 11 Located in the main valley of the Valley of the Kings, Theban Hills, West of the Nile, Egypt
Posts: 42921 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
______________________________^^^SAME FIGURE AS BELOW __________photo #1__________________________photo#2_______________photo#3
The above is three photos showing a section of the wall. In each section are two figures of the same type. On the actual wall you see more figures of each group but here you see only two of each because these are close up detail photos obviously not showing the entire wall.
______________________________________________________________^^^SAME FIGURE AS ABOVE
the above is one single very bad photo only showing one group. It is also a detail photo, a section of a wall which is a scene with a much larger number of figures.
there is no contradiction between the two pictures
neither picture shows all of the different types that are on the actual wall.
Mike you're seeing things that are not there again.
posted
So mike are you saying that the Italians targeted the darkest part of the Libyan population as policy?..I am not saying that's not what they did but do you have records stating that was the intent? mind you they did mass killings in Ethiopia also prior to the opening of WWII and given the fascist mind set you may well be right but I am looking for records stating that was the intent...Genocide.
Posts: 6546 | From: japan | Registered: Feb 2009
| IP: Logged |
AS a soldier you would be demoted to the rank of a private, for the following reasons:
Rudeness to a General;
Shooting without aim...
I have never contested that blacks Africans own the entire North Africa from ancient. I spent about two productive days educating Lioness on the phenotypes of North Africa. I never saw you comment there.
My problem with you hasty rambling is that you need to take on the full perspective of the meaning of Berber, and its implication for Black Africa.
You need to study brothers like eminent Prof. Cheik Anta Diop from Senegal, who grew up sharing borders and culture with Berbers, to fully explain where the Berbers are from.
When you can comment on that perspective, buzz me.
BTW: I do have better information that you would ever have on how the Italians tried to exterminate the Blacks of Libya.
I can throw in some for starters here but I say, what the heck, Mike needs to learn his start reading some, instead of looking at pictures alone.
What is the use of arguing with someone who does not understand the history, culture or politics of Black Africans in Africa?
And in the same vien, I should observe that Ghaddafi is not a Turk, but an Italian. He is half truk/half Italian, left by the Italian army to rule Libya.
King Idris whose photo you have been spamming endless is another Yemeni/Turki type for your information. You need to go find colour pictures of him instead of spamming old black and white pics.
In conclusion, I wish to say to you, Private Mike, that when Generals talk about their places of birth, origin and cultural context, it is better you hush up and learn.
Lion!
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
Lord of the Nile and Mike(jo nogowa??). Nice lead. So he is not even an Arab.. . man this world is fughked up.
==
Gaddafi was born in a Bedouin family near Sirt. Although this claim is not proven, there is speculation that his biological father was Albert Preziosi, a Free French Forces air officer of Corsican origins.[4]
As an early follower of Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser and his Arab socialist and nationalism ideal, he took a part as a teenager in anti-Israeli demonstrations during Suez Crisis.[5]
An early conspirator, he began his first plan to overthrow the monarchy while in military college. He received further military training in the United Kingdom.[5]
===
In what appears to be a racially incendiary move, Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, recently offered to stem the steady influx of Africans into various European nations in an effort to keep Europe white and civilized. Gaddafi told Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi on a recent trip to Rome that the European Union (EU) should pay him at least 5bn euros ($6.3 billion) a year to stop illegal African immigration and avoid a “Black Europe.”
Massaging old racial wounds and growing concerns, Gaddafi hoped to capitalize on fears that millions of Africans, who once lived under the subjugation of European colonial rule and who were made citizens of those nations, would continue to migrate to their “Mother Country” impoverished, and without clear means of employment.
“Tomorrow Europe might no longer be European, and even Black, as there are millions who want to come in,” Gaddafi reportedly told a European news agency. “We don't know what will happen, what will be the reaction of the white and Christian Europeans faced with this influx of starving and ignorant Africans.
We don't know if Europe will remain an advanced and united continent or if it will be destroyed, as happened with the barbarian invasions,” Gaddafi said. Historian Abdulmolsen Ali said that the precarious nature of relations between Gaddafi and leaders of African countries, particularly those with large Muslim populations, remains influx. In fact, Ali suggests that while Gaddafi may speak to racial fears in order to press these nations for funds, the monies would largely benefit the Africans themselves.
“Col. Gaddafi has repeatedly said he wants to use the monies supplied by countries within the European Union to strengthen the infrastructure and economies of the African countries where the illegal immigrants are coming from. Is it that Gaddafi is racist against Africans? Maybe. No one knows what is in another man’s heart, but if the billions he is seeking annually from each of these countries is provided, the entire African continent may be able to support itself without European influence,” Ali said.
Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic