posted
"in historic times, only Berber children wore side-locks ; with grown-up men, it indicated either royalty, or the exercise of high priestly functions, identified with the rites of the Goddess Neith. The long, lock-like beard, is very similar to the beard of Osiris, which the pharaohs also adopted as a sign of royalty. The Libyan pointed-beard and the side-lock may shed more light on the origin of the present-day Jewish side-lock, which they could have picked up in Egypt among other things." (www.temehu.com/)
"Dr Bates notes that side-locks are still worn among the Amazigh Berbers of Morocco"
According to wikipedia, this was the young ramsses II: Posts: 883 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
^^you have got to be kiddin me! Don't you see how wide the damn twist is?! You can't do that with wiry; kinky or tightly coiled hair! Geezus! That can only be accomplished on straight or curly hair. That is, loosely coiled hair.
Try again buddy. The image you have is not a wide twist (which is impossible to do on nappy hair).
If you look at the image below, you can see the strands of hair that make up the sidelock. They are bone as* straight!!!!! This is not the hair trait of a Negro.
quote:Originally posted by Mazigh: "in historic times, only Berber children wore side-locks ; with grown-up men, it indicated either royalty, or the exercise of high priestly functions, identified with the rites of the Goddess Neith. The long, lock-like beard, is very similar to the beard of Osiris, which the pharaohs also adopted as a sign of royalty. The Libyan pointed-beard and the side-lock may shed more light on the origin of the present-day Jewish side-lock, which they could have picked up in Egypt among other things." (www.temehu.com/)
"Dr Bates notes that side-locks are still worn among the Amazigh Berbers of Morocco"
According to wikipedia, this was the young ramsses II:
The Jews do not BRAID their peyos, as in the depiction of Ramses. Their side hair is CURLED.
Do you have any photos depicting these Amazigh Berbers with the hair Braided? As I understand, braiding is considered a hairstyle worn by women, and is prohibited in Islamic culture.
Posts: 747 | From: Atlanta, GA USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
The point of the peyot was to show that only the long strand of hair can be braided in the manner of an Egyptian side-lock. If you look at the relief, you can clearly see the Egyptian had STRAIGHT HAIR, not kinky coiling hair. That is why the artist went to great lengths to stylize the straightness of the hair strand.
Posts: 2025 | Registered: Dec 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
If it's in fact his actual hair and not a wig the Egyptians were famous for, then the hair would have to be very thick, no matter what texture for it to be so wide. Plus there is no evidence in any Ancient Roman or Greek art that depict any EUROPEAN MEN with their hair braided. This is an age-old African custom still practiced to this day in both men and women of African descent.
Posts: 747 | From: Atlanta, GA USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Rural Egyptians and Nubians once braided their hair from birth in the sidelock of youth. There are some rural Egyptians and Nubians that have straight hair but its mostly between tightly curled and wavy. Many southern Egyptians have hair like the Beja people. The Beja were known collectively as fuzzy wuzzies by Kipling. However, the fact that the end of the braid curls shows
homeylu, I cannot think of Greco-Roman depictions of braids but braiding is not just exclusively African or for individuals with tightly curled hair. I doubt that collectively the ancient Egyptians had bone straight hair. For instance, the said braids appear to curl at the end which is typically not an indication of bone straight hair.
Posts: 8675 | From: Tukuler al~Takruri as Ardo since OCT2014 | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mazigh: "in historic times, only Berber children wore side-locks ; with grown-up men, it indicated either royalty, or the exercise of high priestly functions, identified with the rites of the Goddess Neith. The long, lock-like beard, is very similar to the beard of Osiris, which the pharaohs also adopted as a sign of royalty. The Libyan pointed-beard and the side-lock may shed more light on the origin of the present-day Jewish side-lock, which they could have picked up in Egypt among other things." (www.temehu.com/)
"Dr Bates notes that side-locks are still worn among the Amazigh Berbers of Morocco"
According to wikipedia, this was the young ramsses II:
For one, you have taken two pictures that have very little to do with one another. Your first picture is an atypical Asian, your next picture is Egyptian, nice try though. Better luck next time......WaIT! And now The Berbers are out to Claim Egyptian History...........Damn....Ok who is not trying to tie their history to Egypt?...Wow
Posts: 163 | From: United States | Registered: Aug 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by homeylu: If it's in fact his actual hair and not a wig the Egyptians were famous for, then the hair would have to be very thick, no matter what texture for it to be so wide.
Yea, very thick within the straight hair range. Go fvck yourself w/your bullsh1t excuses.
quote: Plus there is no evidence in any Ancient Roman or Greek art that depict any EUROPEAN MEN with their hair braided.
If any poster tries to debate this Euro relic he/she deserves all the insult this Euro piece if sh!t gives them. LOL
Posts: 4254 | From: dasein | Registered: Jun 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
This topic was discussed several times before. In African cultures hairstyles are used to symbolize various things such as age and status. It is actually a common tradition among many African cultures for children to be shaved except for one or more patches of hair which is usually braided. Ausar is correct that this tradition continued among both modern rural Egyptians and Nubians until recently.
Homeylu is wrong to say that Europeans never braided their hair, since some groups did, however I should point out that both Greeks and Romans considered braided hair among men to be a trait associated with "barbarians" from further north. The braided side-lock of youth however was NOT a custom associated with any Europeans or Asians that I am aware of, but is strictly AFRICAN, which brings me to this...
quote:Originally posted by Cowering Asshole-holic:
Yeah, great job proving our point that the hairstyle is AFRICAN as that bust is of a Ptolemaic prince of EGYPT as that link you provided clearly explained! Now how about showing us an actual Greek or other European born and raised in an actual European country having such a hairstyle!! LMAOPosts: 26238 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Recovering Afro-holic: Source: link
Thanks for this jackass, I was looking for more examples of whites appropriating black culture. Posts: 4254 | From: dasein | Registered: Jun 2009
| IP: Logged |
Lycinus (describing a young Egyptian): "This boy is not merely black; he has thick lips and his legs are too thin . . . his hair worn in a plait behind shows that he is not a freeman."
Timolaus: "But that is a sign of really distinguished birth in Egypt, Lycinus, All freeborn children plait their hair until they reach manhood. It is the exact opposite of the custom of our ancestors who thought it seemly for old men to secure their hair with a gold brooch to keep it in place." (Lucian, Navigations, paras 2-3)
What a perfectly fitting quote to silence the rat..
Posts: 8785 | From: Discovery Channel's Mythbusters | Registered: Dec 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Recovering Afro-holic: Source: link
Thanks for this jackass, I was looking for more examples of whites appropriating black culture.
Indeed, what an idiot the Ass-hole is! I didn't even need to click on the link to know that the bust is of a Ptolemy of Egypt!
This reminds me how the actress Bo Derek made cornrow with beaded braids popular among "mainstream" (white) society to the point that in the 70s and early 80s the style was actually named after her!
^ This despite her admitting to the public time and again that it was a BLACK hairstyle given to her by her AFROCENTRIC hairdresser! Not surprisingly many white women and girls who wanted hair like that had to go to the black hairdressers. LOLPosts: 26238 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
Lycinus (describing a young Egyptian): "This boy is not merely black; he has thick lips and his legs are too thin . . . his hair worn in a plait behind shows that he is not a freeman."
Timolaus: "But that is a sign of really distinguished birth in Egypt, Lycinus, All freeborn children plait their hair until they reach manhood. It is the exact opposite of the custom of our ancestors who thought it seemly for old men to secure their hair with a gold brooch to keep it in place." (Lucian, Navigations, paras 2-3)
What a perfectly fitting quote to silence the rat..
LOL That's right! I had almost forgotten about this passage.
Posts: 26238 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
The moderator Henu a.k.a. Yom once posted pics of children from his home country of Ethiopia with braided locks on shaved heads. Most of the pics aren't working but here are a couple:
Posts: 26238 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
The braided side-lock of youth however was NOT a custom associated with any Europeans or Asians that I am aware of, but is strictly AFRICAN, which brings me to this...
That's right. Youth side-lock is strictly an African custom, and the fact that the AE shared this custom, is significant. The issue of hair texture is a distraction, which in any case, is merely emphasized to elicit the point that it is braided.
more examples from previous discussions...
Mazigh's post of an adult Tamahou figure with a long slender side-lock, like that on the Jewish kid, is NOT a youth side-lock. In fact, it doesn't even demonstrate the purpose Mazigh may have the intentions for posting it -- to demonstrate a "Berber" connection with AE, since, again like the Jewish kid, the Tamahou were supposed to have side-lock on both sides of their head, running down the temple region. The youth side-lock is only directed to one side of the head, as in the AE example and the Himba boy.
Posts: 7516 | From: Somewhere on Earth | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by StTigray: And now The Berbers are out to Claim Egyptian History...........Damn....Ok who is not trying to tie their history to Egypt?...Wow [/QB]
You're strange! Where did I claim the Egyptian civilisation? buhh... you always claim it is an african civilisation. To make it only "black"! And how about saying that the first is typic "Asian"?
Don't tell me so...., and discuss what the subject of this topic. ---
The Libyco-Berber sidelock is thought to be related to the Egypto-Libyan Goddess Neith and Horus.
"It is worth remark- ing that the Libyan chiefs wear a long side-lock like the Horus-lock of Egyptian children and princes. "
That answers a question posed in this forum: "Why is he wearing that Earring? " (The original answer was: "Why is this defeated Libyan from Abu Simbel near Aswan wearing an Ankh for an ear ring? Why does he have the Jewish Payot or sidelock.)
"in historic times, only Berber children wore side-locks ; with grown-up men, it indicated either royalty, or the exercise of high priestly functions, identified with the rites of the Goddess Neith."
"According to several historical records, the Libyan birthplace of the Goddess Neith, whom the Greeks adopted as Athena, as has been pointed out by Plutarch, Diodorus, Herodotus and (indirectly) Plato, was also the traditional homeland of the warrior women known as the Libyan Amazons, in the western parts of Libya, particularly around the legendary Lake Tritonis; where the Libyan Poseidon's son Theseus married the queen of the Amazons. The world of the Amazons was ruled by women warrior, in which they followed a manner of life unlike that which prevailed among other races of the time." (tamahou.com)
Posts: 883 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
homeylu, I cannot think of Greco-Roman depictions of braids but braiding is not just exclusively African or for individuals with tightly curled hair. I doubt that collectively the ancient Egyptians had bone straight hair. For instance, the said braids appear to curl at the end which is typically not an indication of bone straight hair.
quote:Originally posted by homeylu:
If it's in fact his actual hair and not a wig the Egyptians were famous for, then the hair would have to be very thick, no matter what texture for it to be so wide. Plus there is no evidence in any Ancient Roman or Greek art that depict any EUROPEAN MEN with their hair braided. This is an age-old African custom still practiced to this day in both men and women of African descent.
Are you just parroting my remarks?
quote:Originally posted by Djehuti: Homeylu is wrong to say that Europeans never braided their hair,
Where is the quote where "homeylu" stated this? In the future it would help if your read my actual statement, and NOT Ausur or anyone else's 'distorted' version. Thanks.
quote:Originally posted by Djehuti: since some groups did, however I should point out that both Greeks and Romans considered braided hair among men to be a trait associated with "barbarians" from further north.
Who were those groups, you speak of, we're talking about antiquities, not Bo Derek? The Romans would often describe barbarians with LONG hair, and considered it uncouth, which is why they required their men to shave their hair and beards, and not let it grow out like the 'savages'. But you would have to enlighten me about these "Northern barbarians with braids " thru art or ancient text, I'm waiting.
quote:Originally posted by Recovering Afro-holic: Now retract your bullsh1t. Source: link
Could you at least leave the African continent, to refute my statement. Where are all these little boys with braids??? It will help your position if you find them in 'remote' areas away from any AFRICAN influence, and be sure it's an actual 'side lock' as Truth depicted.
quote:Originally posted by Kalonji: Djehuty,
Also note that:
Lucian (Greek writer, 125 B.C.)
Lycinus (describing a young Egyptian): "This boy is not merely black; he has thick lips and his legs are too thin . . . his hair worn in a plait behind shows that he is not a freeman."
Timolaus: "But that is a sign of really distinguished birth in Egypt, Lycinus, All freeborn children plait their hair until they reach manhood. It is the exact opposite of the custom of our ancestors who thought it seemly for old men to secure their hair with a gold brooch to keep it in place." (Lucian, Navigations, paras 2-3)
What a perfectly fitting quote to silence the rat..
Good post!
Posts: 747 | From: Atlanta, GA USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
It's important to note that Herodotus referred to everything west of the Nile valley as Libya and the people to the North of Libya as Berbers and to the South as Ethiopian. We now know that he is speaking of the entire continent of Africa when he speaks of Libya.
"One thing more also I can add concerning this region, namely, that, so far as our knowledge reaches, four nations, and no more, inhabit it; and two of these nations are indigenous, while two are not. The two indigenous are the Berbers and Ethiopians, who dwell respectively in the north and the south of Libya. The Phoenicians and the Greek are in-comers."
He speaks of various Ethiopian tribes, and various Berber tribes. He is NOT, which several people tend to confuse with modern names, speaking specifically about Modern day Ethiopia or Modern day Libya. For those who don't know.
Posts: 747 | From: Atlanta, GA USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
Isn't it interesting how some folks just completely discount the first-hand eyewitness testimony/accounts of the ancient ones (e.g, Herodotus' description of the physical characteristics of people of ancient Kmt, etc.)....(as well as ones not so ancient)....
yet first-hand eye-witness testimony/account is so important for everything else to those same ones...
If what I just said made sense the way I worded it...
htp.
Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by homeylu: "One thing more also I can add concerning this region, namely, that, so far as our knowledge reaches, four nations, and no more, inhabit it; and two of these nations are indigenous, while two are not. The two indigenous are the Berbers and Ethiopians, who dwell respectively in the north and the south of Libya. The Phoenicians and the Greek are in-comers."
This is an incorrect translation. Did you translate it yourself?
Edit: OK, i see you got it from "North of Afica.com". But noone others would translate it as "Berbers versus Ethipgians". Since, those Etheopians were possibly also Berbers.
This is worth a sperate topic. Posts: 883 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Recovering Afro-holjc, often imitated but never duplicated. The Other is an imposter.
Other ex-Euroloons should follow suit.
^^you have got to be kiddin me! Don't you see how wide the damn twist is?! You can't do that with wavy; straight or uncoiled hair! Geezus! That can only be accomplished on African or curly hair. That is, kinky coiled hair.
Try again buddy. The image you have is not a wide twist (which is impossible to do on caucasian albinos hair).
If you look at the image below, you can see the African strands of hair that make up the sidelock. They are bone as* African!!!!! This is not the hair trait of a Caucasian Albino.
Yea, very thick within the African hair range. Go fvck yourself w/your bullsh1t excuses.
quote:Originally posted by The Explorer: That's right. Youth side-lock is strictly an African custom, and the fact that the AE shared this custom, is significant. The issue of hair texture is a distraction, which in any case, is merely emphasized to elicit the point that it is braided.
more examples from previous discussions...
Mazigh's post of an adult Tamahou figure with a long slender side-lock, like that on the Jewish kid, is NOT a youth side-lock. In fact, it doesn't even demonstrate the purpose Mazigh may have the intentions for posting it -- to demonstrate a "Berber" connection with AE, since, again like the Jewish kid, the Tamahou were supposed to have side-lock on both sides of their head, running down the temple region. The youth side-lock is only directed to one side of the head, as in the AE example and the Himba boy.
Correct. Which is the exact reason why the Asshole-holic is dumbfounded and stricken silent. Anyone else want to dispute the African identity and affinity of this Egyptian hairstyle? Anyone else? I don't think so. Posts: 26238 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by homeylu: Where is the quote where "homeylu" stated this (no European men had braided hair)? In the future it would help if your read my actual statement, and NOT Ausur or anyone else's 'distorted' version. Thanks.
You said it here:
"Plus there is no evidence in any Ancient Roman or Greek art that depict any EUROPEAN MEN with their hair braided."
This is false, since I have seen a few examples of Roman art portraying Celtic men with braided hair.
quote:Who were those groups, you speak of, we're talking about antiquities, not Bo Derek? The Romans would often describe barbarians with LONG hair, and considered it uncouth, which is why they required their men to shave their hair and beards, and not let it grow out like the 'savages'. But you would have to enlighten me about these "Northern barbarians with braids " thru art or ancient text, I'm waiting
No need to get smart. It is a known fact that more northerly European men such as Celts, Germanics, and even Balts and Slavs braided their hair. Of course we are talking about the simple European braids and not some shaven head lock of youth seen in Africa or more elaborate microbraids etc. This is why the Greeks and Romans associated braided hair among men to be a 'barbaric' trait.
Posts: 26238 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by homeylu: Where is the quote where "homeylu" stated this (no European men had braided hair)? In the future it would help if your read my actual statement, and NOT Ausur or anyone else's 'distorted' version. Thanks.
You said it here:
"Plus there is no evidence in any Ancient Roman or Greek art that depict any EUROPEAN MEN with their hair braided."
This is false, since I have seen a few examples of Roman art portraying Celtic men with braided hair.
No need to get smart. It is a known fact that more northerly European men such as Celts, Germanics, and even Balts and Slavs braided their hair. Of course we are talking about the simple European braids and not some shaven head lock of youth seen in Africa or more elaborate microbraids etc. This is why the Greeks and Romans associated braided hair among men to be a 'barbaric' trait.
Please post photos of this art, and I will stand corrected. If not photos, then at least ancient text, describing these 'barbarians' Thanks.
Posts: 747 | From: Atlanta, GA USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ I am unable to find any pictures off the net, but I have seen them in books. Here are also some brief references to traditional European hairstyles.
Men wore long braided hair and skirts with pleats. The skirts were dyed yellow from saffron. Irish men also wore wool trousers. In the 15th century, King Henry VIII passed laws forbidding traditional Celtic clothing. From that point on, Irish people were forced to wear English clothing.
People - men and women are both depicted in Celtic art, with various hairstyles and clothing. Usually their hair and limbs are knotted up much like the knotwork interlace designs. People are drawn either in a full front manner or in perfect profile, never in partial profile.
...Most People carried their own Comb. Especially Men liked to wear their Combs as a decorative item hanging on the Belt. With the help of these Combs, Hair was intricately styled and braided. Men also combed and braided their Beards.
I don't know what else to say. Anyone knowledgeable about European culture knows that braided hair was not uncommon among men from northern European cultures. Though of course non of this has any bearing on the side-lock of youth for children in Africa. Posts: 26238 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
Mazigh's post of an adult Tamahou figure with a long slender side-lock, like that on the Jewish kid, is NOT a youth side-lock. In fact, it doesn't even demonstrate the purpose Mazigh may have the intentions for posting it -- to demonstrate a "Berber" connection with AE, since, again like the Jewish kid, the Tamahou were supposed to have side-lock on both sides of their head, running down the temple region. The youth side-lock is only directed to one side of the head, as in the AE example and the Himba boy. [/QB]
I don't what you do mean by "a Berber connection with AE", since that is nod needed. But i would like to see a source of the suppose that "the Tamahou were supposed to have side-lock on both sides of their head, running down the temple region."
Posts: 883 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
The side lock of Berber speaking people is simply part of an African tradition as Berber languages are African in the first place. However, trying to put the origin of this custom in the hands of "Berbers" and specifically "white berbers" is the problem. The custom is ancient across Africa and has been there since before there was a Berber language to begin with.
The Goddess Tanit is only attested to the 5th century BC and therefore cannot be postulated as the origin of the ancient Egyptian goddess neith. And it is from this time that you get the association with Berbers due to the written evidence and cultural evidence found in and around carthage. However, again, the evidence of "Berber" languages and customs do not go back to 3000 BC when Neith and many other Egyptian deities came to be. Evidence for Berber languages and customs only go back, based on actual linguistic and cultural evidence to about the time of Phoenicia.
The problem here is that some people have tried to link the group labeled as Berbers since the Phoenician period, with ancient peoples in North Africa about whom much is not known. In fact some people, as in the article on Wikipedia, try to link the term "Berber" with ancient North Africans from 200,000 years ago. The problem is that Berber is a language not a people and Berber languages are only about 6-8,000 years old at best and originated in North East Africa. There is no actual linguistic evidence that Berber languages existed in North Africa 5,000 years ago. But because some people have tried to use the word "Berber" as a synonym for North Africans, it has been used as a way to tie any and all historic traditions and customs stretching back to the time of ancient Egypt and beyond to "Berbers", which is totally nonsense.
For example, the dress of the Libyans and Temehu are still found among Africans in Niger, like the Peul or Woodabe. It is something that possibly was much more widespread among African cultures in the region than just simply "Libyans". In fact, similar dress can be seen among African peoples in ancient Minoan Frescoes.
Again, the problem is how some people want to tie African customs and traditions to foreigners. For example, trying to make Berber a foreign "not black African" identifier and then using that to claim all sorts of traditions and customs as somehow originating among "not black Africans".
In fact the truth is more likely the opposite. In the 21st Dynasty of Egypt sometimes called the "Libyan" Dynasty, there were depictions of priestesses and goddesses who were associated with Libyans but dressed in Egyptian style. Apparently many of the later images of the goddess Tanit found in the Mediterranean in places like Ibiza and Phoenicia have similar forms.
In fact, this is strongly supported by the fact that ancient Phoenicians also imported other deities from Egypt including Bes. This deity is thought by some to be the name of the ancient town settled by the Phoenicians which became the derivation of the word Ibiza.
quote: Bes statuette found in Carthage, now in the Bardo Museum. Bes was a god recognizable as an Egyptian import, who kept demons away during childbirth. Images of Bes are found throughout Phoenician and Carthaginian territories. The Carthaginians dedicated a new town in Spain to Bes: Carthaginian Ebysos is now Spanish Ibiza.
Therefore, you can look at many of the attributes of Tanit as simply a reflection of the influence of Egyptian culture on later cultures in Northern Africa.
quote:Originally posted by Doug M: [QB] The side lock of Berber speaking people is simply part of an African tradition as Berber languages are African in the first place. However, trying to put the origin of this custom in the hands of "Berbers" and specifically "white berbers" is the problem. The custom is ancient across Africa and has been there since before there was a Berber language to begin with.
One thing spread in this forum, is that i would be a lover of white Berbers. That is not so. The image is not drawn by me.
I don't also claim that this custom is only Berber. But that custom is typical for the Berbers in Ancient Egypt. "The side-lock was a fashion peculiar to the Libyans and ."
quote: The Goddess Tanit is only attested to the 5th century BC and therefore cannot be postulated as the origin of the ancient Egyptian goddess neith. And it is from this time that you get the association with Berbers due to the written evidence and cultural evidence found in and around carthage.
If you think that the attestation is only valable source, then you have also to forget those statement relating Egypt with people without writing systems.
quote: However, again, the evidence of "Berber" languages and customs do not go back to 3000 BC when Neith and many other Egyptian deities came to be. Evidence for Berber languages and customs only go back, based on actual linguistic and cultural evidence to about the time of Phoenicia.
You're not the only one to say this. This it is generally nonsenses and contradicting. All the main afro-asiatic branches are situated in higher dates, excepts the Berber languages, like if it existed after them all. If so, it has to be a dialect of one of those branches. The judgements are not useful: the methode is more covincing.
quote: The problem here is that some people have tried to link the group labeled as Berbers since the Phoenician period, with ancient peoples in North Africa about whom much is not known.
The people labelled as "Berbers" goes back only the Arab period. You want claim that they fall down from the sky in that period.
quote: The problem is that Berber is a language not a people and Berber languages are only about 6-8,000 years old at best and originated in North East Africa. There is no actual linguistic evidence that Berber languages existed in North Africa 5,000 years ago.
From 3000 to 6--8000 to 5000 ? You're not serious. Are you?
quote: But because some people have tried to use the word "Berber" as a synonym for North Africans, it has been used as a way to tie any and all historic traditions and customs stretching back to the time of ancient Egypt and beyond to "Berbers", which is totally nonsense.
Not to all North Africa, but only its indegenous people excepts: the Nubians and Egyptians. And why would it be "nonsense"?
quote: For example, the dress of the Libyans and Temehu are still found among Africans in Niger, like the Peul or Woodabe. It is something that possibly was much more widespread among African cultures in the region than just simply "Libyans".
Niger also populated by Berbers, and the peul may have been descended from the Berbers. You prefer them, because they are black?
quote: Again, the problem is how some people want to tie African customs and traditions to foreigners. For example, trying to make Berber a foreign "not black African" identifier and then using that to claim all sorts of traditions and customs as somehow originating among "not black Africans".
It is you and other black minded (and some eurocentrics) that try to make the Berbers as foreigners because they are not black.
Posts: 883 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
I don't what you do mean by "a Berber connection with AE", since that is nod needed.
If it were not needed, you wouldn't have made the connection between the lock running down the temple region of adult Tamahou figures and AE *youth* side-lock.
quote: But i would like to see a source of the suppose that "the Tamahou were supposed to have side-lock on both sides of their head, running down the temple region."
Not that the burden is on me, but if you look at the images you'll notice that two-dimensional views of the youth side-lock of figures on Egyptian wall murals usually have the lock obscuring the ear where the lock is supposed to descend. It is done that way, because the artists want to project that feel of the lock simply flung sideways, and not necessarily running closely to the side of the face [for examples, see the images I already provided above] like a slender strand of hair, along the temple region and thereof, i.e. ahead of the ear, as that seen in the Jewish boy; note that the lock of the Jewish boy is not so much as braided as it is twirling hair. The AE examples are also shown that way, because the youth side-lock are supposed to convey one thick lump of braided hair that is flung to one side of the head, and not both sides. This hints to me that the adult Tamahou figures have locks that run on both sides of the face, as opposed to the one-sided orientation of the *youth* side-lock.
To demonstrate this visually, take an exceptional case, wherein an *adult* or adult-looking figure sports a youth side-lock -- the moon god Khonsu:
Note the *youth* side-lock on the moon god Khonsu (figure on the right), obscuring the ear.
Here is another view of Khonsu:
Here, the ear is not hidden, but note the thick lump of braided hair tucked behind the ear; that's right -- the difference between the top image of the moon god and this one, is that in the former the braided side-lock is simply flung to the side, while in the latter, not only is it flung to the side, but the moon god's ear pinna (cartilage muscle) is partly holding the braided lock to the back of the ear. This is even more apparent in the following three-dimensional representations of the moon god:
Again, note that the side-lock only runs down to one side of the head, in each case. You have to understand though, courtesy of touregypt.net, that Khonsu's youth side-lock presents a rare case because of his identification as "divine child of Amun and Mut". The divine part explains the fake goatee in his personification.
All that put aside, the burden really lies on you, to show that the Tamahou side-lock(s) are suggestive of a single *youth* side-lock brought to one side of the head, as opposed to side-locks on either side of head.
Posts: 7516 | From: Somewhere on Earth | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Doug M: The side lock of Berber speaking people is simply part of an African tradition as Berber languages are African in the first place. However, trying to put the origin of this custom in the hands of "Berbers" and specifically "white berbers" is the problem. The custom is ancient across Africa and has been there since before there was a Berber language to begin with.
One thing spread in this forum, is that i would be a lover of white Berbers. That is not so. The image is not drawn by me.
I don't also claim that this custom is only Berber. But that custom is typical for the Berbers in Ancient Egypt. "The side-lock was a fashion peculiar to the Libyans and ."
The side lock comes from Africa. Period. The ancient peoples of Northern Africa are but one example of its usage in history but it is not the origin of the custom and it is not unique or peculiar to those people. The problem is that we don't have images in art of other African people across the continent from that time period like we do for those who were close to Egypt. It doesn't mean that other Africans didn't exist with similar customs. The people depicted with such locks in Egypt were not called Berbers. And whether they were depicted with it or not does not change the facts that the Egyptians also used it from the Old Kingdom. They are simply two examples of this ancient African tradition that we have evidence for, neither of whom indicate the origins of such a tradition.
quote:
quote: The Goddess Tanit is only attested to the 5th century BC and therefore cannot be postulated as the origin of the ancient Egyptian goddess neith. And it is from this time that you get the association with Berbers due to the written evidence and cultural evidence found in and around carthage.
If you think that the attestation is only valable source, then you have also to forget those statement relating Egypt with people without writing systems.
What I am saying is that the evidence for the goddess Tanit goes back to the 6th century BC. Evidence for Neith and other Egyptian deities goes back to 2000 BC. Those are the facts. If you have evidence of the goddess Tanit from before the 6th century then please provide it. The point is that if there is a relationship between the two it reflects the influence of older Egyptian customs on later Phoenician and Carthaginian customs.
quote:
quote: However, again, the evidence of "Berber" languages and customs do not go back to 3000 BC when Neith and many other Egyptian deities came to be. Evidence for Berber languages and customs only go back, based on actual linguistic and cultural evidence to about the time of Phoenicia.
You're not the only one to say this. This it is generally nonsenses and contradicting. All the main afro-asiatic branches are situated in higher dates, excepts the Berber languages, like if it existed after them all. If so, it has to be a dialect of one of those branches. The judgements are not useful: the methode is more covincing.
The fact is that according to linguists, Berber as a language is not as old as all branches of Afro Asiatic. And my point is that the images of Northern African peoples from ancient Egypt do not define the origin of "Berber" as a language. Nobody knows what the language of the ancient Libu or Tehenu was. The evidence for Berber languages does not go back that far. Those are the facts.
quote:
quote: The problem here is that some people have tried to link the group labeled as Berbers since the Phoenician period, with ancient peoples in North Africa about whom much is not known.
The people labelled as "Berbers" goes back only the Arab period. You want claim that they fall down from the sky in that period.
quote: The problem is that Berber is a language not a people and Berber languages are only about 6-8,000 years old at best and originated in North East Africa. There is no actual linguistic evidence that Berber languages existed in North Africa 5,000 years ago.
From 3000 to 6--8000 to 5000 ? You're not serious. Are you?
quote: But because some people have tried to use the word "Berber" as a synonym for North Africans, it has been used as a way to tie any and all historic traditions and customs stretching back to the time of ancient Egypt and beyond to "Berbers", which is totally nonsense.
Not to all North Africa, but only its indegenous people excepts: the Nubians and Egyptians. And why would it be "nonsense"?
The current extent of "Berber" languages does not reflect the historic distribution or origin of such languages. Within the last 500 years there has been a sharp decrease in the extent of Berber languages across Northern Africa. In Ancient Egypt they identified people all the way down to Aswan as related to the Temehu and Tehenu. And even today you have pockets of Berber speakers in places like Siwa. Therefore, you cannot make an argument about the historic spread of languages based on present distribution.
quote:
quote: For example, the dress of the Libyans and Temehu are still found among Africans in Niger, like the Peul or Woodabe. It is something that possibly was much more widespread among African cultures in the region than just simply "Libyans".
Niger also populated by Berbers, and the peul may have been descended from the Berbers. You prefer them, because they are black?
No they are Africans and practice African customs. They are not Berber and this is the point I am making. Berber is an African language and culture, therefore of course it is related to other African languages and cultures. It is not a people, gene or skin color. Therefore Berbers did not bring African culture to Africa. Berber is a expression of African language and culture not something separate from it. That is my point.
quote:
quote: Again, the problem is how some people want to tie African customs and traditions to foreigners. For example, trying to make Berber a foreign "not black African" identifier and then using that to claim all sorts of traditions and customs as somehow originating among "not black Africans".
It is you and other black minded (and some eurocentrics) that try to make the Berbers as foreigners because they are not black.
I would argue the opposite, that some people try and treat Berber as somehow separate or distinct from Africa as if it isn't African because some Berbers are light skinned. Berber is an African culture and language which originated in Africa among black Africans, no matter how many today are not black. It is no different than the French language originating among white Europeans even though a lot of non white people today speak French.
Posts: 8889 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
@The explorer, No, it seems that they had a single side lock. I didn't say it has to do with youth side lock, and it has not to be in the case of Khonsu or Horus:
quote:In mythology the hair of the gods is a symbol of a symbol of rays of lights (see gilgamas) and the infant Horus in Egypt wears a single side lock, as did the Libyans.
I even add that the Egyptian deities wore two feathers, and so did the Libyans.
I said i don't have to connect the Berbers with the Egyptians, since it generally is not needed. The Berbers are connected to the Egyptians and vice versa. If i do, it is then to shed more light on this connctions.
Posts: 883 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
@Doug M, I won't discuss the language of the Berbers (It would be best if we open a seperate topic to prove that the berber language is the least old, until then, that argument is not taken into consideration).
quote: The ancient peoples of Northern Africa are but one example of its usage in history but it is not the origin of the custom and it is not unique or peculiar to those people. The problem is that we don't have imag...
You can then use this logic for Tanit. However, it was not meant that we discuss Tanit, but Neith. This Neith was already an influencial goddess at the time of Herodotus. Athena is said to be the Berber goddess Neith (Tanit). The Egyptians called it "Neith Tehenu" (Libyan Neith). The side lock and the tattoe's may be realted to this goddess. In this topic, there is also a libyan wearing the Ankh as earring.
quote: The people depicted with such locks in Egypt were not called Berbers.
Neither do the Berbers call themselves "Berbers" The Egyptians called them "Mashwesh" (Mazyces=> Mazigh ) and Libu (Luwata). So no need to use the name Berber.
quote: And whether they were depicted with it or not does not change the facts that the Egyptians also used it from the Old Kingdom.
maybe, you're adressing this to "the explorer". If not, then i do.
Posts: 883 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mazigh: @The explorer, No, it seems that they had a sigle side lock.
What "seems" to you, is your subjective opinion. I have demonstrated my position little more than just a personal feeling, and you haven't addressed it to the contrary.
quote: I didn't say it has to do with youth side lock
However, you did compare the lock on an *adult* Tamahou figure with a *side*-lock of *youth* on an Egyptian *adolescent* figure. Why were you forced to do this rash comparison, without carefully considering what you were doing here? Because you will not have found youth side-lock on ordinary adult AE figures. You disagree? Then, produce one.
quote: , and it has not to be in the case of Khonsu or Horus:
Yes, the locks on these folks are *youth* side-locks. You are not naive enough to deny that, I hope.
quote:Originally posted by Mazigh:
quote:In mythology the hair of the gods is a symbol of a symbol of rays of lights (see gilgamas) and the infant Horus in Egypt wears a single side lock, as did the Libyans.
I even add that the Egyptian deities wore two feathers, and so did the Libyans.
Citing some unnamed sources isn't going to do you any good; you've got to do better than that: You've got give us *material* reasoning behind your position that Tamahou locks could have only been on just one side of their head. I have seen no reason behind this, other your simply saying it is so, because you *feel* it is so. I know you *feel* it is so, but I want you to *show* that it is so. I have already *shown* you why I *feel* it isn't so, hence backing my viewpoint with *material* observation.
quote: I said i don't have to connect the Berbers with the Egyptians, since it generally is not needed. The Berbers are connected to the Egyptians and vice versa. If i do, it is then to shed more light on this connctions.
You know full well that your purpose is to portray AE as some lost "Berber" ethnicity, not merely some other *non-ethnic* "connections" here and there. AE were not Imazighen by any stretch of the imagination.
quote:Originally posted by Mazigh:
quote:And whether they were depicted with it or not does not change the facts that the Egyptians also used it from the Old Kingdom.
maybe, you're adressing this to "the explorer". If not, then i do.
If you are directing it to me, then I simply have this to say to you: Adult AEs did not wear the youth *side*-lock, and it was normally something restricted the adolescent. The burden lies with you or another other who says otherwise.
Posts: 7516 | From: Somewhere on Earth | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
"“They let their hair grow long on the right side of their heads, and shave it close on the left; they besmear their bodies with red paint; and they say that they are descended from the men of Troy. Their country and the remainder of Libya towards the west is far fuller of wild beasts and of wood than the country of the wandering people.” Herodotus goes on to specify which wild beasts : huge serpents, lions, elephants, bears, aspics, horned asses. “Here too are the dog-faced creatures, and the creatures without heads, whom the Libyans declare to have their eyes in their breasts; and also the wild men, and wild women, and many other far less fabulous beasts.” (Hist. IV.188ff.) " (He -Herodotus- speaks on the Maxyans)
Herodotus makes it ,thus, clear. It is not just a feeling.Posts: 883 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well, if Herodotus saw certain things with his own pair of eyes, I suppose then, I'll have to take him at his word, in ordinary circumstances. That said, I'd like to see you clarify I few things for me:
1)What record(s) tells us about the Tamahou around Herodotus' time?
2)If there is any currency to what Herodotus is telling us here, by way of translation, then why does your own posting say something different:
Did the AE artist overlook this peculiarity, that the lock was supposed to only be on the right side of the figure's face? And if you think this is the only instance that this happens, consider this:
3)Should we also take Herodotus at his word, when he says that they are descended from the men of Troy. Who is Troy?
4)Should we also take him at his word, when he speaks of "the creatures without heads"?
5)You can only find the side-lock of youth in *adolescent* AE personalities, and not adults. If the cultural background of these locks are the same, how come *adult* Tamahou figures would continue to bear one, and not their *adult* AE counterparts?
6)Why is the side-lock on the AE youth drawn differently from that seen in the Tamahou, as I had noted a few posts ago?
Posts: 7516 | From: Somewhere on Earth | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
1- No idea. You? 2- The Egyptians are said to distinguish the Libyans from themselves for ideological reasons. The side lock is depicted on both sides. If depends on the image. They had to depict that difference:
The egyptians are not always accurate: You see here that the clothes are identic in the Libyan and hettite. The beard is also identic in Libyan and syrian:
- Herodotus is not always accurate, but he is a good reference (father of history?).
-The maxyans being descendants of Troye. He didn't believe him "claim", but said they believe. (It is possible that some Libyans dwelled between Greece and Libya).
- Different, because it the same status. The Libyan side lock is to be associated with the side lock of horus. (Horus seem to be of Libyan origin, or common between them).
Posts: 883 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
It doesn't befall on me to have an idea here; you are the one on defense about something you claim to be the case. If you have no idea, then how can you vouch for the veracity of what Herodotus is presumably telling you?
quote: 2- The Egyptians are said to distinguish the Libyans from themselves for ideological reasons.
They were *in fact* different from them. Do you have any reason to suggest otherwise?
quote: The side lock is depicted on both sides. If depends on the image.
Depends on what about the image?
quote: They had to depict that difference:
The difference is far and wide; for one, the side-lock is only identified with the *youth* of AE society, whereas the lock is on *adult* Tamahou figures.
You still haven't answered why the AE side-locks are wider, *braided*, usually displayed as covering the ear, and usually accommodated an almost completely shaved head; why is this not the case with the Tamahou adult figures?
quote:
The egyptians are not always accurate: You see here that the clothes are identic in the Libyan and hettite. The beard is also identic in Libyan and syrian:
They are not accurate, because they show distinctions between different groups?
quote: - Herodotus is not always accurate, but he is a good reference (father of history?).
quote:-The maxyans being descendants of Troye. He didn't believe him "claim", but said they believe. (It is possible that some Libyans dwelled between Greece and Libya).
Alright, I'm willing to entertain that explanation, but what about the below...
- Different, because it the same status. The Libyan side lock is to be associated with the side lock of horus. (Horus seem to be of Libyan origin, or common between them). - Mazigh
If the two items have the same status, then should it not follow that they share that "status" in common, and that it doesn't make them "different" from that standpoint, LOL?
The "side-lock of horus" again is only associated with *youth*; it is not some unconnected thing with the other youth side-locks of AE, as you seem to imagine. It is only found on figures implicated with *youthfulness* or adolescence. Why would *adult* Tamahou therefore adopt a tradition that is reserved for the adolescent?
You only answered two of 6 questions; what is the matter -- not enough material?
Posts: 7516 | From: Somewhere on Earth | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Djehuti: ^ I am unable to find any pictures off the net, but I have seen them in books. Here are also some brief references to traditional European hairstyles.
Men wore long braided hair and skirts with pleats. The skirts were dyed yellow from saffron. Irish men also wore wool trousers. In the 15th century, King Henry VIII passed laws forbidding traditional Celtic clothing. From that point on, Irish people were forced to wear English clothing.
People - men and women are both depicted in Celtic art, with various hairstyles and clothing. Usually their hair and limbs are knotted up much like the knotwork interlace designs. People are drawn either in a full front manner or in perfect profile, never in partial profile.
...Most People carried their own Comb. Especially Men liked to wear their Combs as a decorative item hanging on the Belt. With the help of these Combs, Hair was intricately styled and braided. Men also combed and braided their Beards.
I don't know what else to say. Anyone knowledgeable about European culture knows that braided hair was not uncommon among men from northern European cultures. Though of course non of this has any bearing on the side-lock of youth for children in Africa.
No ANCIENT art, and No ANCIENT text, but an E-How article and a site selling REPLICAS of Viking and Celtic hair accessories, is offered as 'evidence', and you laugh at Recovering? At least he did offer a statue of an ANCIENT period. Since it was so 'common' as you claim, then it should be very easy to source during said time period, since most of the history of Celts and Germanic tribes came to us from Roman and Greek sources. As you know the Celts did not record their own history, so what you read on such 'un-sourced' sites is merely 'imaginary'.
Further, there was no term 'Irish' during the era in question, we're not speaking about Medieval time periods here; Since you refuted my statement "There is no evidence in any Ancient Roman or Greek art that depict any EUROPEAN MEN with their hair braided." Then you should stay with the same time period to invalidate it. Thanks.
Posts: 747 | From: Atlanta, GA USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
^^ I stand corrected, as my best friend a Greek History Professor, informed me that the Ancient Greek gods particularly the "Naxian Sphinx" is often depicted with braids. So Djehti, I owe you an apology. BUT, he did state that this sphinx has heavy Egyptian influence.
Posts: 747 | From: Atlanta, GA USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mazigh: @Doug M, I won't discuss the language of the Berbers (It would be best if we open a seperate topic to prove that the berber language is the least old, until then, that argument is not taken into consideration).
quote: The ancient peoples of Northern Africa are but one example of its usage in history but it is not the origin of the custom and it is not unique or peculiar to those people. The problem is that we don't have imag...
You can then use this logic for Tanit. However, it was not meant that we discuss Tanit, but Neith. This Neith was already an influencial goddess at the time of Herodotus. Athena is said to be the Berber goddess Neith (Tanit). The Egyptians called it "Neith Tehenu" (Libyan Neith). The side lock and the tattoe's may be realted to this goddess. In this topic, there is also a libyan wearing the Ankh as earring.
quote: The people depicted with such locks in Egypt were not called Berbers.
Neither do the Berbers call themselves "Berbers" The Egyptians called them "Mashwesh" (Mazyces=> Mazigh ) and Libu (Luwata). So no need to use the name Berber.
quote: And whether they were depicted with it or not does not change the facts that the Egyptians also used it from the Old Kingdom.
maybe, you're adressing this to "the explorer". If not, then i do.
Actually the Egyptians called them by many names, indicating there were many different ethnic groups. So you have Tehenu, Temehu, Libu, Meshwwesh and so on. The Tehenu and Temeju go back to the 5th dynasty and 12th dynasty respectively and then are followed in the New Kingdom by the Meshwesh and then Ribu and Libu from which the term Libyan derives.
The oldest of these groups were depicted as almost identical to the Egyptians and it was not until the 12th dynasty that we have evidence of blue eyed Temehu.
Any way, none of this provides any sort of antiquity of Neith as originally a Libyan goddess imported into Egypt. And in reality there are older goddesses that filled the role even before Neith. Sopdet is the oldest member of the Egyptian pantheon with attributes similar to those of Neith.
Bottom line, the early identities of people to the west of Egypt does not change the fact that these traditions we are speaking of are African.
Posts: 8889 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
"Connus depuis l’antiquité pharaonique sous les noms de Lebu, Tehenu, Temehu, Meshwesh, les Berbères subsistent dans un immense territoire qui commence à l’ouest de l’Égypte. Actuellement des populations parlant le berbère habitent dans une douzaine de pays africains, de la Méditerranée au sud du Niger, de l’Atlantique au voisinage du Nil...." http://www.mondeberbere.com/histoire/camps/origines.htm
(Gabriel Camps father of the Northwest African history?)
This means that we have to determine the basics, and thereafter, we can go further... reducing those works and acting like nothing it known by claiming, that this or that not Berber is, is not helping a constructed knowledge.
As Neith is concerned, Flinders Petrie stated: "Neit was a goddess of the Libyan people ; but her worship was firmly implanted by them in Egypt. " ( Religion of Ancient Egypt - W. M. Flinders Petrie )
However, the article didn't mention the Berbers, it mentioned all the time the "Libyan". The author is not ignoring the Berber rlation, since in the word-tags, we find this:
"Labels: Amazigh, Ancient Egypt, Kemet, Kushite, Nile Valley, Tamasheq, Tamazight" (Amazigh is of course Berber).
Posts: 883 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mazigh: "Connus depuis l’antiquité pharaonique sous les noms de Lebu, Tehenu, Temehu, Meshwesh, les Berbères subsistent dans un immense territoire qui commence à l’ouest de l’Égypte. Actuellement des populations parlant le berbère habitent dans une douzaine de pays africains, de la Méditerranée au sud du Niger, de l’Atlantique au voisinage du Nil...." http://www.mondeberbere.com/histoire/camps/origines.htm
(Gabriel Camps father of the Northwest African history?)
This means that we have to determine the basics, and thereafter, we can go further... reducing those works and acting like nothing it known by claiming, that this or that not Berber is, is not helping a constructed knowledge.
As Neith is concerned, Flinders Petrie stated: "Neit was a goddess of the Libyan people ; but her worship was firmly implanted by them in Egypt. " ( Religion of Ancient Egypt - W. M. Flinders Petrie )
However, the article didn't mention the Berbers, it mentioned all the time the "Libyan". The author is not ignoring the Berber rlation, since in the word-tags, we find this:
"Labels: Amazigh, Ancient Egypt, Kemet, Kushite, Nile Valley, Tamasheq, Tamazight" (Amazigh is of course Berber).
Terms like Libyan, Berber are problematic going back 5,000 years as no state or ethnic group existed with those names. Therefore, associations with those names have to be put into proper context. There have been many different people and cultures who existed in the region West of Egypt who can be said to be ancestors of modern Libyans, but at that time there was no Libya so they weren't Libyans.
Likewise, some of the references that state Neith was a Libyan goddess are problematic because the earliest references to Neith are from Upper Egypt, then Lower Egypt, with none from "Libya". I would like to know how on earth this goddess can be associated with Libya without any specific evidence for that association.
A key point here to remember is that in the thousand years leading up to the predynastic people from the South and West entered the Nile valley searching for water. It is from these people and those along the Nile, that ancient Egyptian civilization arose. Therefore, when tracing traditions, one must understand that people to the West of Egypt had a role in settling the Nile Valley leading to dynastic Egypt, but calling them Libyan in general may be misleading. One reason is because the geographic area called "Libya" today is not the same as the entire expanse of the Sahara to the West of Egypt and may not reflect the actual paths from the West that people took to get to the Nile Valley.
Look up some of the early predynastic cultures to the West and South of Egypt and see if they are associated with Libya or not.
Posts: 8889 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |