posted
Originally posted by Mike111: In summarizing the above posts, let’s try to put a face on the mentioned Humans and Humanoids. Of course, since we are dependant on “White” people to provide the busts, we have to put up with a certain amount of silliness from “White” people.
I am sure everyone has seen this one. It’s really White people saying; “We were there”, “We were there”, We were there because we say so, and because we make the pictures! Silly White people.
The following is the exact order in which Humans and Humanoids appear.
Homo – Habilis - sub-Saharan Africa (only) about 2.5 million to 1.5 million years ago.
Homo- Erectus – Originated in Africa about 2 million years ago. By about 500,000 years ago, he began to gradually migrate into Asia and parts of Europe. Homo-erectus appears to have ranged widely over the Earth. Erectus fossils were first found at Trinil on the island of Java, near Peking in China, Specimens from Europe were discovered at Bilzingsleben and Mauer (both in Germany), and Petralona (Greece).
Homo erectus is thought to have evolved in Africa from H. habilis, the first member of the genus Homo. Anatomically and physiologically, H. erectus resembles contemporary humans except for a stouter bone structure. The size of its braincase (850—1000 cc), approaches that of H. sapiens, but the cranial bones are more massive than either those of H. habilis or modern humans.
There are other fossils, that seem to represent subspecies of Homo-sapiens (the next in line) dating from the late Middle or early Late Pleistocene, and these are found in Africa at Kabwe (Broken Hill), Elandsfontein - the Cave of Hearths, Lake Ndutu, Omo, and Bodo, and in Europe at Swanscombe, Steinheim, Biache, Ehringsdorf, La Chaise, and Vértesszollos. It is among these that the line of distinction between Homo-erectus and Homo-sapiens becomes dim, for it seems that these are the creatures that represent the gradual progression from Homo-erectus to Homo-sapien.
Homo - Sapiens (Modern Man)
Homo - Sapiens (Modern Man) – 400,000 B.C. - Present
The Genus and species to which all modern human beings (Homo-sapiens-sapiens), belong and to which are attributable fossil remains of humans in Africa, from 400,000 years ago or more. Homo sapiens are distinguished from other animals and from earlier humanoid species by characteristics and habits such as bipedal stance and gait, brain capacity averaging about 82 cubic inches, high forehead, small teeth and jaw, defined chin, construction and use of tools, and the ability to make use of symbols such as used in language and writing. Some of these features were possessed by the immediate ancestor, Homo erectus; but in the aggregate they are characteristic only of Homo sapiens.
Neanderthal (Here we run into some more “White” foolishness, just have a laugh and move on).
Neanderthal - 100,000 to 30,000 B.C. (extinct)
Anatomically Neanderthals were somewhat shorter but much more robust than contemporary H. sapiens. Distinctive cranial features of Neanderthals included prominent brow ridges, low, sloping foreheads, a chinless and heavy, forward-jutting jaw, and extremely large front teeth. The shoulders and pelvis were wider, the rib cage more conical in shape, and the forearms and lower legs shorter. When placed in an evolutionary perspective, Neanderthal anatomy gives the impression of a large and somewhat "primitive" hominid, as though the evolutionary trajectory of Homo sapiens had somehow reversed itself. This impression is offset somewhat by the observation that the Neanderthal braincase measured on average about 1600 cc, larger than contemporary Homo sapiens
Cro-Magnon (Here we run into TOTAL “White foolishness”. Even the Russians couldn’t bring themselves to depict the creature without making it SOMEWHAT “White”. Those poor “White” people, Nature left them out!).
Cro-Magnon – 40,000 – 4,000 B.C. (extinct)
Cro-Magnon is the name of a rock shelter near Dordogne France. Here several prehistoric skeletons were found in 1868, these human remains are of the Upper Paleolithic period, 40,000 –10,000 years ago. Among these bones is the cranium and mandible of a male about 50 years old. This male is considered representative of the Cro-Magnon type, and this particular specimen is known as the “Old Man of Cro-Magnon.”
The skull is longheaded, the forehead is straight, the brow ridges only slightly projecting, the cranial vault noticeably flattened, and the occipital bone (at the back of the head) projects backward. The cranial capacity is large, about 100 cubic inches. Although the skull is relatively long and narrow, the face appears quite short and wide. This combination is often regarded as a common feature of the Cro-Magnon race.
The forward projection of the upper jaw is also distinctive. The eye sockets are low-set, wide, and rather square in shape; and the nasal aperture of the skull is narrow and strongly projecting. The mandible is robust, with massive ascending ramus (the upward projection of the lower jaw, where it attaches to the skull), has strongly developed points of muscular attachment, and a quite prominent chin. The stature of Cro-Magnon is from five feet five inches to five feet seven inches, though in some areas they are taller.
The question of the relation of Cro-Magnons to the earliest forms of Homo-sapiens (like Neanderthal) is still unclear. It does appear however, that Cro-Magnons and Neanderthals are closer in affinity than was once believed. Though Cro-Magnon is found all over Europe, Asia and the Mediterranean, The tendency now is to locate the origin of the Cro-Magnon type Humanoid in the Middle-east: as typified by the remains found at the Jebel Qafzeh and Skhul sites in what is now Israel. Just as complex as the origin of Cro-Magnons, is that of the duration of Cro-Magnons. It appears that they flourished during the Upper Paleolithic (old stone age, 40,000 - 4,000 years ago).
Remember from previous post.
Modern Man – The African modern man (Grimaldi) entered Europe at about 45,000 B.C. (the only one left)
Cro-Magnon – This Levant “Humanoid” entered Europe at about 35,000 B.C. They ceased to exist at about 4,000 B.C. (However, for racist reasons, they are often used "Euphemistically" as a replacement for the African Grimaldi).The following is an example of how they Bull-sh1t it!
The term (Cro-Magnon) falls outside the usual naming conventions for early humans and is used in a general sense to describe the oldest modern people in Europe, though also a specific (but very frequent) subtype among their fossil remains. In recent scientific literature the term "early modern humans" is used instead. The oldest definitely dated specimen is from 34,000–36,000 years ago. [/QUOTE]
Re-posting for continuity and future search.
Mike111 Member # 9361
posted
Originally posted by Mike111: xyyman – Since the progression above does NOT make sense, let’s see if we can come up with a scenario that DOES make sense.
First, let’s see who the possible players were, and what they looked like.
Homo–Habilis is out of it because he disappeared by 1.5 million years ago.
Homo - Sapiens (US - Modern Man) showed up at about 400,000 B.C.
But look at this!
Homo-Erectus – 2,000,000 – 250,000? B.C.
Homo-Erectus was still around at the same time as US (modern people)!
Now we know that “Modern Man” evolved in SOUTHERN Africa. And we know that Homo-Erectus was all over the place. We also know that Neanderthal began in NORTHERN Africa (at about 100,000 B.C.).
So after “Modern Man” begins in SOUTHERN Africa, we know that he heads NORTH. Just look at this guy, is there any doubt in your mind, that once he gets in the north and gets horny, if he runs across a Homo-Erectus girl, he is going to do the nasty with he! She’s a goner for sure!
So this:
Plus this:
Equals this:
So now we know how Neanderthal came into being. But what about Cro-Magnon?
Well, we know that Cro-Magnon began in the Levant at about 40,000 B.C. So who was in the Levant at that time? Guess who - “Modern Man” and Neanderthal!
So this:
Plus this:
Equals this:
Mike111 Member # 9361
posted
Originally posted by Mike111: xyyman - Just to complicate things a little bit more for you; consider this:
10,000 years BEFORE those southern Africans went to China. A different group of south Africans had gone to Australia. They looked like this. (Note the straight hair).
We also know that the ORIGINAL Chinese (Mongols), looked much more NEGROID than they do now. (Probably because of admixture with Whites).
As you also know; it is meninarmer's position that Whites are really Black African Albino's.
So I ask you, if this man was an Albino with straight hair, what would you call him?
He was also in Central Asia at about that time - but he was NOT in China. And what makes it REALLY interesting, is that Neanderthal was the ONLY Humanoid who was "COLD ADAPTED". So what effect, if any, might he have had on White people becoming White people???
Mike111 Member # 9361
posted
As is clear from the postings above; Blacks and Whites have taken different paths, and these were at different times, along the evolutionary journey. In the case of Blacks, the path is clear and straightforward. To summarize:
Homo-habilis
Homo-habilis: We believe, was the first of the "great Ape" type creatures to have evolved to the point where he could be called "Homo" (MAN).
Homo- habilis is now extinct, but he inhabited parts of sub-Saharan Africa about 2 million to 1.5 million years ago. Homo-habilis is generally accepted as the earliest member of the genus Homo. He is following Australopithecus and preceding Homo-erectus. He was given the name Homo habilis, meaning 'handy man', because he made tools. We think that he was the first creature to make tools for specific purposes. Like if he needed a sharp edge to cut meat, he would strike two pieces of flint against each other, and the pieces that broke away would usually have a sharp edge, instant Knife.
Homo-erectus
Next we have Homo-erectus, he seems to have been restricted to the African tropics for the first several hundred thousand years of his existence, but eventually; by about 500,000 years ago, he began to gradually migrate into Asia and parts of Europe. Homo erectus or 'upright man’ was the first creature to stand fully upright. He was probably also the first to use fire. We think that Homo erectus built campfires and may have made simple ovens with hot stones. Homo-erectus appears to have ranged widely over the Earth. Erectus fossils were first found at Trinil on the island of Java; other finds were near Peking in China, at Ternifine in Algeria, and at Olduvai Gorge and Koobi Fora in eastern Africa. Also in northwestern Africa at Salé, Sidi 'Abd ar-Rahman, and Rabat, all in Morocco. Specimens from Europe were discovered at Bilzingsleben and Mauer (both in Germany), and Petralona (Greece).
There are other fossils, that seem to represent subspecies of Homo-sapiens (the next in line) dating from the late Middle or early Late Pleistocene, and these are found in Africa at Kabwe (Broken Hill) in Zambia, the Cave of Hearths in South Africa, Lake Ndutu in Tanzania, Omo, and Bodo, in Ethiopia. And in Europe at Swanscombe in England, Steinheim and Ehringsdorf in Germany, Biache and La Chaise in France, and Vértesszollos in Hungary. It is among these that the line of distinction between Homo-erectus and Homo-sapiens becomes dim, for it seems that these are the creatures that represent the gradual progression from Homo-erectus to Homo-sapien.
Note: Pleistocene: means the “Great Ice Age.” which began about 1,600,000 years ago and ended roughly 10,000 years ago.
Middle Pleistocene (780–130 ya) Late Pleistocene (130–10 ya)
Homo-sapiens
The Genus and species to which all modern human beings (Homo-sapiens-sapiens), belong and to which are attributable fossil remains of humans in Africa, from 400,000 years ago or more. Homo sapiens are distinguished from other animals and from earlier humanoid species by characteristics and habits such as bipedal stance and gait, brain capacity averaging about 82 cubic inches, high forehead, small teeth and jaw, defined chin, construction and use of tools, and the ability to make use of symbols such as used in language and writing. Some of these features were possessed by the immediate ancestor, Homo erectus; but in the aggregate they are characteristic only of Homo sapiens.
This is the "Oldest known" life-like statue made by Man. It is called "Lion Man" and is dated 30,000 B.C. It was found in Hohlenstein-Stadel, Germany, and was probably made by the Grimaldi Africans; who were the first "Modern Humans" in Europe, and who had entered Europe at Gibraltar in about 45,000 B.C.
The following are examples of some of the oldest "Life like" depictions of Man by Man.
Cave painting (Anatolia/Turkey)
Homo-sapiens continued: Homo sapiens, “man the wise,” is the only currently existing species of the genus Homo. It is difficult, if not impossible, to follow the evolutionary steps that led to modern man in the fossil record. Charles Darwin himself defined the problem. “In a series of forms graduating insensibly from some ape-like creatures to man as he now exists, he wrote in The Descent of Man, it would be impossible to fix on any definite point when the term "man" ought to be used.”
Gobekli Tepe (Anatolia/Turkey) - 11,500 B.C.
Homo-sapiens continued: One of the things that makes discovery of a point of distinction so difficult, is that Homo-sapien is the product of an evolutionary process called mosaic evolution. Which postulates that humans did not evolve smoothly as a species, but that various populations evolved at different rates, according to environmental and genetic circumstances. And because fossils are the remains of individuals, who may differ even within populations, one fossil alone or even a few do not adequately describe how a population may have evolved.
Hacilar (Anatolia/Turkey)
Sumer (Iraq) 3,500 B.C.
Continued next frame.
Mike111 Member # 9361
posted As stated above, the evolutionary path of Blacks is clear and straightforward. The same cannot be said of Mongols and Whites. Their origins are a jumble of Humans and Humanoids which still defies resolution. The participants in this jumble are:
Homo-habilis is believed to have remained in sub-Saharan Africa, and so is not part of the equation.
Therefore the first Humanoid in Asia was Homo-Erectus, who may have arrived at about – 1,500,000 B.C. He became extinct at about 250,000 B.C.
The first wave of Modern Humans out of Southern Africa; occurred at about 60,000 B.C. But these people are believed to have hugged the Southern coast of Asia, and continued on to Australia.
The second wave of Modern Humans out of Southern Africa; occurred at about 50,000 B.C. This group is known to have reached East Asia. This group is the first "Modern Humans" in Asia, all subsequent Modern Humans descend from them.
When this group reached Asia, Homo-Erectus was likely long extinct. However Neanderthal was likely there to welcome them (note; Neanderthal was NOT in East Asia). They would later be joined by Cro-Magnons (note; Cro-Magnon WAS in East Asia). To complicate matters even more; the African Grimaldi, who had entered Europe at about 45,000 B.C. Eventually migrated East; as far as Ma’lta Siberia. He too became part of the mix of Humans and Humanoids in Asia.
To simplify things; Asia can be separated into Central Asia – believed to be the place of origin of Caucasians (Whites), and East Asia – believed to be the place of origin of Mongols (Chinese).
In East Asia (Mongols); there were three participants:
Note: Neanderthal was not in East Asia.
1) Modern Humans directly from Africa (about 50,000 B.C.).
2) Modern Humans who migrated eastward from Europe. They reached Ma’lta Siberia (north of China and Mongolia) by about 24,000 B.C. (the picture assumes that they looked similar to other people in Russia at that time).
3) Cro-Magnon Man (born of Neanderthal and Modern Man in the Levant - about 40,000 B.C. he became extinct at about 4,000 B.C.).
Out of that mix come the Mongols; who appear quite different today, than they originally did. (Probably as a result of admixture with their neighbors: the Caucasians).
In Central Asia (Whites) it gets much more complicated. There were four participants:
1) Neanderthal (born of Modern Man and Homo-erectus in North Africa - about 100,000 B.C. he became extinct at about 30,000 B.C.). Of Neanderthal, it is said that they exhibit anatomic adaptations to cold, especially in Europe, such as large body cores and relatively short limbs, which maximize heat production and minimize heat loss. The evidence of Neanderthal’s body adaptations to cold weather also makes it possible to assume that there was also a change in skin color from dark, with lots of melanin, to a lighter tone with less melanin. A story in ScienceDaily seems to support that conclusion.
ScienceDaily (Oct. 26, 2007) — Ancient DNA retrieved from the bones of two Neanderthals suggests that at least some of them had red hair and pale skin, scientists report in the journal Science. The international team says that Neanderthals' pigmentation may even have been as varied as that of modern humans, and that at least 1 percent of Neanderthals were likely redheads.
There is not as yet any data, which proves that Neanderthals admixed with Humans in Central Asia (Neanderthal was not in East Asia). However he probably did, and if these arriving people were Albinos, it would have a mitigating effect on their Albinism.
2) Modern Humans from Africa (about 50,000 B.C.). This group is the first "Modern Humans" in Asia, all subsequent Modern Humans descend from them. It is speculated by some, that Whites may have originated as African Albinos. This is somewhat supported by Genetic data that shows that the biochemical systems of Asian and European populations appear to be more similar to each other, than they are to African populations. Thus, Asians (Mongols) and Europeans (Caucasians) may have shared a common ancestry with each other, some 40,000 years ago and a common ancestry with African populations, some 120,000 years ago. Moreover, investigations of human mitochondrial DNA reveals that there is a distinction between African and other human mitochondrial DNA types, suggesting that African peoples are very old, and that Asians (Mongols) and Europeans (Caucasians) are relatively young.
So it is possible that there were two separate groups who took part in the 50,000 B.C. migration. Albinos and Africans with what is now called “Mongol” features – such as the Khoisan girl pictured. If the Albinos separated and went into Central Asia as a group, with no possibility of admixture with normal Humans; then the defective melanin-producing gene would become “fixed”. Modern experiences of Albinos in Africa, makes that scenario very plausible.
In modern day Africa: Albinos suffer not only from the climate, but also from the treatment of fellow Africans. Not only are they ostracized, but they suffer violence as well. Attacks for the purpose of removing body parts to be used in rituals, is not unknown.
Relating to skin color: there was also a study done by a team led by geneticist Keith Cheng of Pennsylvania State University (PSU) College of Medicine in Hershey PA.. Which issued a new report on the evolution of a gene for skin color; which suggested that Europeans acquired pale skin quite recently, perhaps only 6000 to 12,000 years ago.
It is very hard to gauge the value of this study, because the authors did not clearly define “Europeans”. If they were talking about people “IN” Europe during that timeframe (6000 to 12,000 years ago.), then of course the study is just pure racist bunk. The Africans in Europe never changed color; they were displaced, killed or absorbed by incoming Caucasians. All Caucasians in Europe are a result of migrations FROM Central Asia INTO Europe. But, if they are talking about the Central Asians NOW known as Europeans, then the study might have some merit.
Reference the Qin dynasty soldiers: Since Ancient Mongols retained their Negroid features, and presumably their dark complexion as late as 200 B.C. It can be logically assumed that Caucasians had different circumstances and experiences in Africa and Asia.
3) The Grimaldi Africans who migrated eastward from Europe.
4) Cro-Magnon Man (born of Neanderthal and Modern Man in the Levant - about 40,000 B.C. he became extinct at about 4,000 B.C.).
There is not as yet any data, which proves that Cro-Magnon admixed with Humans in Central Asia. However he probably did, and if these people were Albinos, it would also have a mitigating effect on their Albinism.
No one has as yet produced a working scenario of why Caucasians left Central Asia in such great numbers.
In the 20th century, Marija Gimbutas created the Kurgan hypothesis, a modern variation of the traditional invasion theory. The name is after the Kurgans (burial mounds) of the Eurasian steppes. The hypothesis is that the Indo-Europeans were a nomadic tribe of the Pontic-Caspian steppe (now Eastern Ukraine and Southern Russia) and expanded in several waves during the 3rd millennium BC. Their expansion coincided with the taming of the horse. Leaving archaeological signs of their presence (see battle-axe people), they subjugated the peaceful European Neolithic farmers of Old Europe.
There are no records of when they actually arrived in Europe. Their arrival would necessarily lead to war and upheaval for the indigenous Africans, consequently written records would be abandoned. And since the invading Caucasians were illiterate nomadic pastoralist, there was no one to record what took place.
The first migrants out of Central Asia, are believed to be the Arian’s who entered India at about 1300-1000 B.C.
The Hellenes/Dorian’s are known to have entered central Greece from the north at about 1,100 B.C.
The Latin’s are believed to have reached Italy by about 1,000 B.C.
The Scythians, the Parthian's, the Parni, and other Arian's entered Persia/Iran from central Asia, at about 900 B.C.
Archeological evidence suggests a relatively uniform Germanic people were located at about 750 B.C. from the Netherlands to the Vistula and in Southern Scandinavia. In the west the coastal floodplains were populated for the first time, since in adjacent higher grounds the population had increased and the soil became exhausted. At about 250 BCE some expansion to the south had occurred and five general groups can be distinguished: North Germanic in southern Scandinavia, excluding Jutland; North Sea Germanic, along the North Sea and in Jutland; Rhine-Weser Germanic, along the middle Rhine and Weser; Elbe Germanic, along the middle Elbe; and East Germanic, between the middle Oder and the Vistula. This concurs with linguistic evidence pointing at the development of five linguistic groups, mutually linked into sets of two to four groups that shared linguistic innovations.
The Germanic peoples are a historical ethno-linguistic group, originating in Northern Europe and identified by their use of the Indo-European Germanic languages which diversified out of Common Germanic in the course of the Pre-Roman Iron Age. The descendants of these peoples became the ethnic groups of North Western Europe: the Swedes, Norwegians, Faroese, Icelanders in Scandinavia, the Germans, Flemish on the continent, and the inhabitants of South-East Scotland, East England and South-East England in Great Britain. Migrating Germanic peoples spread throughout Europe in Late Antiquity (AD 300-600) and the Early Middle Ages. Germanic languages became dominant along the Roman borders, Austria, Germany, Netherlands, Belgium, England), but in the rest of the (western) Roman provinces, the Germanic immigrants adopted Romance) dialects.
The migration period peoples that would coalesce into a "German" ethnicity are the Saxones (Saxons), Frisii (Netherlands, Germany), Franci (the Franks), Thuringii (central Germany), Alamanni (Bavarii Czech Republic, Bohemia, Austria, Bavaria).. By the 800s, the territory of modern Germany had been united under the rule of Charlemagne, although much of what is now Eastern Germany remained Slavonic-speaking (Veleti)
The Goths (Gutans) were East Germanic tribes who, in the 3rd and 4th centuries, harried the Roman Empire and later adopted Arian Christianity. In the 5th and 6th centuries, divided as the Visigoths and the Ostrogoths, they established powerful successor-states of the Roman Empire in the Iberian peninsula and Italy.
The Slav’s, the largest ethnic and linguistic group of peoples in Europe belonging to the Indo-European linguistic family. It is estimated that the Slavs number over 300 million in the world. They are usually classified in three main divisions. The West Slavs include the Poles, the Czechs, the Slovaks, and the (also known as Lusatians) and other small groups in E Germany. The South Slavs include the Serbs, the Croats, the Slovenes, the Macedonians, the Montenegrins, the Bosniaks, and the Bulgars. The East Slavs, the largest group, include the Great Russians, Ukrainians, and Belorussians (or White Russians).
From the early 6th century they spread from their original homeland (most commonly thought to be in Eastern Europe to inhabit most of eastern Central Europe, Eastern Europe and the Balkans. It is not known when they left Central Asia.
The Turks were the last of the Caucasian tribes to migrate west. In 1071 the Seljuq sultan Alp-Arslan defeated the Byzantine Empire at the Battle of Manzikert and thereby opened the way for several million Oguz tribesmen to settle in Anatolia.
akoben Member # 15244
posted
Lay off the Twix Mike, seriously.
Mike111 Member # 9361
posted Clarifications
1) The statement above, Quote: “The first wave of Modern Humans out of Southern Africa; occurred at about 60,000 B.C. But these people are believed to have hugged the Southern coast of Asia, and continued on to Australia.” This statement makes it sound like these first migrants out of Africa, did not populate the lands that they encountered, as they continually pressed eastward.
That is of course incorrect; these first migrants OOA, did indeed populate the lands that they encountered. Since we are interested in what they probably “looked like”, it would be worthwhile to use the Australian aborigine; who remained isolated in Australia for 50,000 years+ as a template.
The original Australian, and thus, the original people of (greater) India, probably looked very much like this man. Note; that he has very dark skin, straight hair, and what is considered “Caucasian” facial features.
2) Above, in the “East Asia (Mongols)” section, which relates to the second migration OOA (50,000 B.C.) which populated Northern Asia and Japan; a Khoisan girl, with Asian features was used as an example of what those FIRST Mongol people, probably “Looked Like”.
A better example might be gotten from some members of the “Indus Valley Civilization”. Which was possibly the first civilization created. This civilization was mainly in greater India (Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh), but it effectively extended north to the Himalayas and east to what is now Vietnam. Its major cities were Mohenjo-daro, Harappa, Lothal, and Mehrgarh. These cities were located in what is now, North Western India and Pakistan.
However; these busts should not be taken as typical, the ancient Indus Valley people, are generally recognized as being Dravidians; similar to the Australians. Additionally; the ancient people of Japan, Burma, Thailand, Cambodia, Viet Nam, Malaysia, Indonesia, New Guinea, and New Zealand were Africans with “typical” African facial features.
These people acquired their “Current” Mongol features as a result of conquest by the Chinese. The Japanese Jomon and Ainu were conquered by the Mongol "Yayoi" in 350 B.C. The ancient people of Burma, Thailand, Cambodia, and Viet Nam, were conquered and absorbed by migrating Mongols from China, beginning at about 900 A.D. The Mongolization of south-east Asia was complete with the fall of the Champa kingdom in Viet Nam at about 1700 A.D.
3) The suggestion is made above; that ONLY the people going to Central Asia might have been Albinos. The fact is; there is no way to know.
As can be seen in these photos of Mongol type Cuna Indians in Panama; an Albino Cuna looks very similar to a Chinese.
Normal Cuna:
Albino Cuna:
Also in that section above: A Negroid type Albino, was used as an example of what the 50,000 B.C. OOA migrants to Central Asia might have “Looked Like”. A better example might be to use a Dravidian type Albino, since they have Caucasian features.
Note should be made however, that current Indians in the north: (Pakistani and Hindu) are already lighter complexioned, because of admixture with invading Arians from Central Asia, this began at about 1300-1000 B.C.
Normal people in Rajasthan, a state in North West India, not far from the Indus Valley in Pakistan.
An Albino family in Rajasthan begging (they look like normal Caucasian people).
Whoops: The picture does not come-up. The link below can be copyed and pasted into your browser address window. Don't bother just clicking the link, it won't work.
posted 
