...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Palo-Americans and their descendants
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [qb] No members of the OOA population made their way to the New World. There is clear evidence that the OOA population settled Asia. But lets not forget that if the OOA population who took the eastern route out of Africa left the Continent around 60kya this would have been during the last Ice Age. The Ice Age latsed from from 110kya to around 12kya. As a result the OOA populartion would have found it impossible to take a land route to the Americas across Beringa. As a result, your insistence that the OOA population made their way to the Americas does not correlate with the environmental and archaeological evidence. . [IMG]http://www.geocities.com/olmec982000/Slide1.GIF[/IMG] . The ancient Americans looked more like the Khoisan then Australians, because they came from Africa not Asia. [IMG]http://www.geocities.com/olmec982000/Slide18.GIF[/IMG] . [/qb][/QUOTE]Clyde, you still aren't making sense. The picture you posted is from a model of a skull in South America. It supports research that says the original native Americans came from AUSTRALIA among populations like Aborigines. It does not support what you are talking about. Australian aborigines along with the aborigines of ALL of Asia are black. Some have straight hair (Australia) and others look more like Africans (New Guinea). New Guinea and Australia are considered places with the OLDEST populations in Asia, outside South Asia. ALL of these people are black and ALL of them have features that are very much similar to Africans. Therefore, why on earth would Australian and African features found in the first Americans be a sign of DIRECT African migration, when THE SAME Australian/African features are found in the FIRST ASIAN populations as well. Why the disconnect Clyde? There is no distinction between these Australian/African features and the features of the FIRST people in Asia, because they are very much the same. NONE of these people are MELANESIANS Clyde. So melanesian features have nothing to do with it. [/qb][/QUOTE]There you go showing your stupidity again. We were discussing the San and Australians--not Melanesians. [IMG]http://cienciahoje.uol.com.br/materia/resources/images/chc/old/chc102e.jpg[/IMG] You attempt to make it appear that anthropologists claim the earliest skeletal remains found in the Americas such as Luzia are definitely Australian. This is not true Neves made it clear that the anatomy of her skull and teeth - including a narrow, oval cranium, projecting face and pronounced chin - likens Luzia to Africans and Australasians. . [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3