...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
New Evidence Provides An Alternative Route 'Out Of Africa' For Early Humans
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bettyboo: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Knowledgeiskey718: [qb] [QUOTE]You heard what I said! I'm tired of all these stupid scientist looking for an 'Out-of-Africa' story. Migrations took place, but there was never an 'Out-of-Africa' journey in which different pockets of Africans left "Africa" during specific chapters in life's history and populated the earth. [/QUOTE]Oh really? Pray, do tell how you would explain this? http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/01/070112104129.htm [IMG]http://www.sciencedaily.com/images/2007/01/070112104129.jpg[/IMG] [b]The field of paleoanthropology is known for its hotly contested debates, and one that has raged for years concerns the evolutionary origin of modern people. A number of genetic studies (especially those on the mitochondrial DNA) of living people indicate that modern humans evolved in sub-Saharan Africa and then left between 65,000 and 25,000 years ago to colonize the Old World. However, other genetic studies (generally on nuclear DNA) argue against this African origin and exodus model. Instead, they suggest that archaic non-African groups, such as the Neandertals, made significant contributions to the genomes of modern humans in Eurasia.[/b] [b] Until now, the lack of human fossils of appropriate antiquity from sub-Saharan Africa has meant that these competing genetic models of human evolution could not be tested by paleontological evidence.[/b] [b]The skull from Hofmeyr has changed that. The surprising similarity between a fossil skull from the southernmost tip of Africa and similarly ancient skulls from Europe is in agreement with the genetics-based "Out of Africa" theory, which predicts that humans like those that inhabited Eurasia in the Upper Paleolithic should be found in sub-Saharan Africa around 36,000 years ago. The skull from South Africa provides the first fossil evidence in support of this prediction.[/b] -------- http://www.pnas.org/content/104/18/7367.full.pdf+html?sid=4fe8c6d0-a57b-49c0-ac09-a5f3a6e6b88f European early modern humans and the fate of the Neandertals Erik Trinkaus* [b] "The skull is large and robust. [/b] [b]The maximum estimated length and breadth of the [/b] [b]neurocranium, as well as most measurements of the facial skeleton,[/b] [b]lie at or exceed[/b] [b]two standard deviations[/b] (SD) [b]of the means for modern African males[/b] [b],whereas they lie within these limits for Late Pleistocene crania from Eurasia and North Africa(table S3)."[/b] "As a result of an ongoing cleansing of the fossil record through direct radiometric dating, a series of obviously modern, and in fact Late Upper Paleolithic or Holocene, human remains have been removed from consideration (7). [b]This cleansing has helped to dilute the impression that the earliest modern humans in Europe were just like recent European populations.[/b] Thus, [b]Hofmeyr[/b] is seemingly [b]primitive[/b] in comparison to [b]recent African crania[/b] in a number of features, including a prominent glabella; moderately thick, continuous supraorbital tori; a tall, flat, and straight malar; a broad frontal process of the maxilla; and comparatively large molar crowns. [/qb][/QUOTE]This shyt is nothing but CLAIMS. Another case of Hocus Pocus science. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3