...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
KEITA AN AFROCentric fraud
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Morpheus: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Gynphobic: He can use my words all he wants they aren't copyrighted. The claim that niggers built ancient Egypt is both laughable and preposterous. Have niggers built anything comparable in other parts of sub-Saharan Negroid Africa? Well, obviously not! As a matter of fact, never have sub-Saharan Negroids ever built anything that even remotely compared to the magnificent art, architecture and civil engineering projects of ancient Egypt; never have niggers ever produced a body of written literature or a culture that is as rich or even as diverse and complex as that of the ancient Egyptians. Even the Nubians, a people of mixed Caucasoid/Negroid origin who became substantially Egyptianized due to frequent exposure to the cultures of the Nile valley, never constructed anything as magnificent or as grandiose. Given the fact that niggers have an IQ of 70, which is a level of intelligence that is indicative of borderline mental retardation, it is highly unlikely that niggers played any role in the establishment of Egyptian civilization, except as slaves and indentured servants to Mediterranean Caucasoid slave masters.[/QUOTE]LMAO! You racist vermin are a hoot! What were Europeans doing during the thousands of years that Ancient Egypt was flourishing? Nothing of significance! I recommend that you read [i]Black, Spark White Fire: Did African Explorers Civilize Ancient Europe?[/i] by Richard Poe to learn about the debt that Western Civilization owes Ancient Egypt which is acknowledged by the Ancient Greeks. Of particular interest is the 1st chapter Darkest Europe which documents the culture of Central and Northern Europe before the spread of Greco-Roman civilization. They were savages who practiced all manner of barbarism including cannibalism and beastiality. They were regarded as inferior by their Southern neighbors who held Northeast African Blacks in much higher esteem. The development of civilization is very complex and history itself does not support racial hierarchies. Only insecure racist losers like yourself need to identify themselves with the accomplishments of others to mask your personal failings in life. That's why you troll the internet all day looking down on other people. Because you are a LOSER and that's all you're ever going to be. :D Don't even start with that IQ nonsense we've got plenty of counter sources for that garbage. For instance: [QUOTE] Traits that are clinally distributed are under the control of selective forces that are distributed in graded fashion. Traits that cluster in certain regions are simply the results of relatedness and are not adaptively important. Traits that are of equal survival value for all human populations should show no average difference from one population to another. Human cognitive capacity, founded on the ability to learn a language, is of equal survival value to all human groups, and consequently there is no valid reason to expect that there should be average differences in intellectual ability among living human populations. The archaeological record shows that, at any one time during the Pleistocene, survival strategies were essentially the same throughout the entire range of human occupation. Both archaeological and biological data contribute to the picture of the slow emergence of human linguistic behavior and its subsequent maturation. The similarities in human capability were not the result of a sudden, recent, and localized common origin. Instead, the widely shared common human condition was the consequence of a long-term adaptation to common conditions during which specific unity was maintained by low but nontrivial rates of genetic exchange among groups. The differences in human lifeways that have arisen since the end of the Pleistocene-and in most instances much more recently-have had too little time to have had any measurable effect on the generation of inherited differences in intellectual ability. When average group differences in intelligence test scores are encountered, the first conclusion to be drawn is that the circumstances under which intellectual capabilities are nurlured and developed are not the same for the groups in question. Where such tests show different racial averages in test scores, this should be taken as an index of the continuing effects of race prejudice and not of inherent differences in capability. [b]Source:[/b] An anthropological perspective on race and intelligence : The non-clinal nature of human cognitive capabilities [URL=http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=1565402]Abstract[/URL] [/QUOTE]See Also: [URL=http://www.cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?10.062]RACIALISM, RACISM, AND THE BIGOT BRIGADE Book Review of Jensen on Intelligence-g-Factor[/URL] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3