...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
KEITA AN AFROCentric fraud
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Morpheus: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by realone: BLACK EGYPT IS IMPOSSIBLE!! CT is the ancestral haplogroup from which DE eventually diverged, but CT, CF, and C have never been detected in Africa, with these haplogroups only reaching their highest frequencies and greatest diversity in Asia. How could CT be ancestral to DE, but CT/CF/C be completely absent from the continent of Africa? Therefore, it should be obvious that E is of Asian origin. Similarly, D is much older than E and is geographically restricted only to Asia; it is impossible that DE originated in Africa, because D has never been detected in Africa; on the other hand, Asia has the greatest amount of YAP(+) diversity, with all three forms of YAP(+) being present, meaning that Asia is the likely birthplace of DE. Now let's look at what Underhill et. al. said about the conditions necessary for an Asian origin of YAP(+) with the full quotation before us, from his 2001 paper: One prediction of this model is that the ancestral state of this lineage, which would be YAP(+) but ancestral for both the eastern (M174C) and western (M96C) sublineages , should be found in the Asian population(s) where the insertion originally occurred. Then there was this discovery made by Shi et. al. in 2008, sometime after the Underhill et. al. paper: In surprise, we observed two DE* in the Tibetan samples, which was previously only observed in Africa (Nigerians), but not in other world populations. North eastern Africans share the same Eurasian mtDNA/Y-DNA sequences (such as Y-DNA Hg J and T, mtDNA Hg M and U) with North Africans and other white Mediterraneans, much of which dates from long after the OOA migration, up until the Neolithic period. The fact that North eastern Africans are more related to Caucasoids than Negroids clearly demonstrates that they belong to the Caucasoid race. Even Hanihara et. al. (2003) admits that sub-Saharan African populations are biologically distinct from all other populations including Egyptians.[/QUOTE]This pathetic troll is quoting verbatim the ramblings of some racist Eurocentrist on another site. http://www.arguewitheveryone.com/1536681-post240.html Kemp admitted to being said Eurocentrist in another thread but perhaps they are both just copycats of another poster. Zarahan already debunked this crap: http://www.geocities.com/nilevalleypeoples/#Modern_DNA_analysis_used_on_ancient_Nile_Valley_peoples If you have any original arguments to make about DNA let us know. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3