...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
KEITA AN AFROCentric fraud
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Morpheus: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by realone: 94% of them were found MIXED not negroid. [/QUOTE]He said that over 80% were found to be Negroid and that most of these were interpreted as being hybrids. Obviously Keita is applying the One-Drop Rule. In any case Northeast African hair is highly variable as Keita notes..... [i]Strouhal (1971) microscopically examined some hair which had been preserved on a Badarian skull. The analysis was interpreted as suggesting a stereotypical tropical African-European hybrid (mulatto). [b]However, this hair is grossly no different from that of Fulani, some Kanuri, or Somali and does not require a gene flow explanation any more than curly hair in Greece necessarily does. Extremely "woolly" hair is not the only kind native to tropical Africa.[/b] This is not to say that gene flow (admixture) never occurred, but only to reit- erate that natural variation should be considered the first line of explanation. This kind of hair, and the lack of appreciation of the Elongated African con- cept (see Hiernaux 1975), have led some (e.g., Robins and Shute 1986) to fail to view their data in an adaptive context. This results in implying that southern early Egyptians were not part of the Saharo-tropical group which includes "Negroes."[/i] [b]- Keita (1993)[/b] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3