...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
KEITA AN AFROCentric fraud
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by zarahan: [QB] real one said: [b]Keita is an afrorcentric fraud who distorts evidence; he misquoted Strouhal as saying that 80% of all predynastic Badarian hair was Negroid in origin:[/b] The only fraud is you and your own quote kills your claim. Your "hair" argument is warmed over bullshiit from Madilda, using E. Stouhal's long defunct early 1970s approach. Is this all you got? In his writing, Keita referred to how certain scholars never develop a "true white" stereotypical model as they do with blacks. If they did, then all hair not meeting a long, straight caucasoid "true" type would be "Negro." But in any event your "point" and that of tired Madilda is bogus, and revealed by your own quote. Note Keita says that "most of these were interpreted as being hybrids." He never claims Stouhal said they were "pure negro" this is something added on by madilda and you to create a bogus "talking point." And if Strouhal's says they were "mixed Negroid-Europid" origin, then that makes them non-white. Either way, they aren't white. In fact, Strouhal points out the long standing African elements not only physically but culturally as well- i.e. the rainmaker. Ironically, Strohal takes pains to point out how the Badarian are linked to african groups, such as in the Sudan. Keita in 2005 put this to the test, making a head to head comparison with whites, blacks and the Badari. Results showed the Badari link much more closely with Africans than white groups, confirming more scientifically, with a bigger sample, the close links noted by Strouhal. Both Strouhal and Keita agree that they had close links to Africans. QUOTE: [i]"An examination of the distance hierarchies reveals the Badarian series to be more similar to the Teita in both analyses and always more similar to all of the African series than to the Norse and Berg groups (see Tables 3A & 3B and Figure 2). Essentially equal similarity is found with the Zalavar and Dogon series in the 11-variable analysis and with these and the Bushman in the one using 15 variables. The Badarian series clusters with the tropical African groups no matter which algorithm is employed (see Figures 3 and 4).. In none of them did the Badarian sample affiliate with the European series."[/i](S.O.Y. Keita. Early Nile Valley Farmers from El-Badari: Aboriginals or "European" Agro-Nostratic Immigrants? Craniometric Affinities Considered With Other Data. Journal of Black Studies, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 191-208 (2005) Brace 1993, so often quoted by Eurocentrics specifically and conveniently EXCLUDED the Badari ensuring the results were skewed a certain way. [IMG]http://africanamericanculturalcenterpalmcoast.org/historyafrican/truenegromodel.jpg[/IMG] Are you aware that your own quote undermines your argument. Look at it again: [i]{Thus] the Negriod component amung the Badarians is anthropologically well based. Even though the share of ''pure'' Negores is small[6.8 percent],being half that of Europoid forms[12.9 percent],the hig majority of mixed forms [80.3 percent] suggest a long-lasting dispersion of Negriod genes in the population. It can be interpreted by the supposition that the mixture of both components began many generations previously..... [/i] Your own Strouhal's quote shows him saying 6.9% pure negro, 12.9 Europid, and the majority (quote) [b]"majority of mixed forms [80.3 percent] suggest a long-lasting dispersion of Negriod genes in the population." [/b] Bingo. Strouhal is saying that most were mixed, and that the data suggested not a preponderance of white people, but a long standing negroid component in the population, something he takes pains to note. This is exactly what Keita is pointing out. Keita is advancing no claim of any "pure negroes" (there is no such thing in any case. He is saying that Strouhal said most were mixed, and that is exactly what is demonstrated by the Strouhal quote above. All can see it. Madilda's claim and yours, is STRAWMAN, and clearly and totally bogus, revealed by the very same quotes you are peddling as "evidence." You shot yourself in the foot again, with your own "evidence." [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3