posted 05 September 2005 12:30 PM            

quote:

---

rasol writes: Nice try loser, but you were attempting to refute Brace's comments on the Equatorial skin color of East Africans, by pretending he wasn't referring to skin color. Idiot.

---

quote:

---

EuroDummy's pathetic excuse:
I didn't know what he was referring to

---

If you don't know, then SHUT UP, FOOL!

Don't try and distort.

That's the kind of idiot behavior that got you into this mess in the first place.

quote:

---

because you hadn't posted the full citation

---

quote:

---

Tony Soprano writes:

Just-

---

posted 05 September 2005 01:21 PM            

quote:

---

ginney pussy:
Just like your little lap-dog Super coon has no answers for this:

A = maternal ancestry
B = paternal ancestry

---

So, ginzo pansy, you are on record admitting that this nonesense doesn't actually address...

• What "haplotypes" [not a map] are considered “Niger Congo” mtDNA in the Ethiopian gene pool, as per the Passarino study?

• Where is the Borana sample that Passarino studied, and what "Niger Congo" mtDNA are they supposed to carry?
  

...but supposedly an off-point ginney gibber meant to be forwarded as a "question".

Bravo, little ginzo ape, for stripping yourself before all, as one truely pussified milksop; you couldn't have done a better a job.---a round of applause---

posted 05 September 2005 06:04 PM            

quote:

---

Evil Euro:
Of course, "African" doesn't equal "Negroid" or "Black", and Australoids are a modern race distinct from generalized pre-historic humans:

"[u]Of all 'major races', Australoids have evidently changed least from the generalised modern human pattern[/u], but the flat, receding forehead and angular skull vault that characterise many full-blooded Aboriginal people today are somewhat different to the Qafzeh/Skhul pattern. A 1999 study by Susan Antón and Karen Weinstein of the University of Florida, in the process of confirming that some of the Australian fossils (including most of the famous Kow Swamp series) had undergone artificial head deformation in infancy, found unexpectedly that most of the Pleistocene fossil Australian crania are rounder-skulled than modern ones. So racial features developed late in this part of the world, too." -- Colin Groves

---

I don't know if this is a relevant point in the debate but the bolded statement, in conjunction with the craniometric map, does not seem to lend credence to a caucasoid East African scenario.

posted 05 September 2005 08:04 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Calypso:
I don't know if this is a relevant point in the debate but the bolded statement, in conjunction with the craniometric map, does not seem to lend credence to a caucasoid East African scenario.

---

Good catch. And this one of dozens of Erroneous Euro contradictions was noted in an earlier conversation:

quote:

---

He presented a skull chart from Brace showing the similarity of modern Sub saharan African crania to those of Melanesians and Australians - people whose ancestors migrated out of East Africa 50 thousand years ago.

---

This cranial [only] map by Brace makes so called Sub-saharans closer to Australio-Melanesians [also oddly lumped together], in terms of skull shape than NorthWest Europeans are to Swedes.

By defintion this would make the Blacks of Africa, Australia, and Melanesia the most like the orignal OOA population and the Europeans....the least like them.

Of course, we already know this to be the case....

quote:

---

J Hum Evol. 2005
Apr;48(4):403-14.

Neves WA, Hubbe M, Okumura MM, Gonzalez-Jose R, Figuti L, Eggers S, De Blasis PA.

Increasing skeletal evidence from the U.S.A., Mexico, Colombia, and Brazil strongly suggests that the first settlers in the Americas had a cranial morphology distinct from that displayed by most late and modern Native Americans. The Paleoamerican morphological pattern is more generalized and can be seen today among Africans, Australians, and Melanesians.

Here, we present the results of a comparative morphological assessment of a late Paleoindian from Capelinha Burial II, southern Brazil.

In both analyses performed (classical morphometrics and geometric morphometrics), the results show a clear association between Capelinha Burial II and the Paleoindians, as well as Australians, Melanesians, and Africans, confirming its Paleoamerican status.

---

....

quote:

---

African Exodus
Christopher Stringer and Robin McKie
1996

"Nor does the picture get any clearer when we move on to the Cro-Magnons, the presumed ancestors of modern Europeans. Some were more like present-day Australians or Africans, judged by objective anatomical observations..."

---

And that's why he was forced to....

[This message has been edited by rasol (edited 05 September 2005).]

posted 05 September 2005 08:14 PM            

So much so, that he speculates the European morphology may be the result of some admixture with Neanderthal:

That splendid Ethiopian specimen is a good candidate for being an ancestor of Ethiopians, but not Europeans.
- C. Loring Brace

posted 05 September 2005 09:04 PM            

quote:

---

Rasol:
Since we are discussing Brace, let's not forget the following....pertaining HertoMan of Ethiopia [150kya], Brace also found it to be most like modern East Africans, and least like Europeans.
So much so, that he speculates the European morphology may be the result of some admixture with Neanderthal:

That splendid Ethiopian specimen is a good candidate for being an ancestor of Ethiopians, but not Europeans.
- C. Loring Brace

---

posted 05 September 2005 11:19 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by rasol:
....

[QUOTE]
African Exodus
Christopher Stringer and Robin McKie
1996

"Nor does the picture get any clearer when we move on to the Cro-Magnons, the presumed ancestors of modern Europeans. Some were [b]more like present-day Australians or Africans, judged by objective anatomical observations..."

---

And that's why he was forced to....

[/B][/QUOTE]

Thought Writes:

These are all great examples Rasol. The so-called **GENERALIZED** morphology is nothing more than a euphimism for the range of ancestral AND modern Black African phenotypic morphologies. In fact the term generalized means undifferentiated. Until recently the people of Australia were known as "Blacks". In the U.K. East Indians are still known as Blacks. The ancient Greeks recognized the eastern and the western Ethiopians. The mtDNA lineage M unites tropical African and Asian people from Guinea-Bissau to the Andaman Islands. The cranial remains of pre-mesolithic Egypt (the region that humans used to migrate out of Africa) have cranial and dental affinities with modern Sub-Saharan Africans, as do modern Andaman Islanders (the proto-Asian types). All of this is consistent with Black people being the first people to inhabit the earth. Relativism is being utilized to create a superficial disassociation between the **GENERALIZED** paleolithic remains found in Africa, Asia, the Americas and early Europe. Superficial variations are blown out of proportion in Africa or when it is related to Black people. But when we discover variation through time in Europe a call for continuity is made:

Thought Posts:

Ancient Germans weren't so fair
Anna Salleh in Brisbane
ABC Science Online
Friday, 16 July 2004

This girl’s ancestors may have had darker skin that didn't burn so easily, ancient DNA suggests (Image: iStockphoto)
Researchers may be able to make more accurate reconstructions of what ancient humans looked like with the first ever use of ancient DNA to determine hair and skin colour from skeletal remains.

The research was presented today at an international ancient DNA conference in Brisbane, Australia, by German anthropologist, Dr Diane Schmidt of the University of Göttingen.

She said her research may also help to identify modern day murderers and their victims.

"Three thousand years ago, nobody was doing painting and there was no photography. We do not know what people looked like," Schmidt told ABC Science Online.

She said most images in museums and books were derived from comparisons with living people from the same regions.

"For example, when we make a reconstruction of people from Africa we think that they had dark skin or dark hair," she said. "But there's no real scientific information. It's just a guess. It's mostly imagination."

She said this had meant, for example, that the reconstruction of Neanderthals had changed over time.

"In the 1920s, the Neanderthals were reconstructed as wild people with dark hair and dumb, not really clever," she said. "Today, with the same fossil record, with the same bones and no other information - just a change in ideology - you see reconstructions of people with blue eyes and quite light skin colour, looking intelligent and using tools.

"Most of the reconstructions you see in museums are a thing of the imagination of the reconstructor. Our goal is to make this reconstruction less subjective and give them an objective basis with scientific data."

Genetic markers for hair colour

In research for her recently completed PhD, Schmidt built on research from the fields of dermatology and skin cancer that have found genetic markers for traits such as skin and hair colour in modern humans.

In particular, Schmidt relied on the fact that different mutations (known as single nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs) in the melanocortin receptor 1 gene are responsible for skin and hair colour.

DNA analysis showed this skull belonged to someone with red hair (Image: Sussane Hummel)
"There is a set of SNPs that tells you that a person was a redhead and a different set of markers tell you they were fair skinned."

She extracted DNA from ancient human bones as old as 3000 years old from three different locations in Germany and looked for these SNPs.

Her findings suggest that red hair and fair skin was very uncommon among ancient Germans.

Out of a total of 26 people analysed, Schmidt found only one person with red hair and fair skin, a man from the Middle Ages. All the other people had more UV-tolerant skin that tans easily.

She said she was excited when she "coloured in" the faces that once covered the skulls, and had even developed "a kind of a personal relationship" with one of them.

"It's not so anonymous," she said. "I think this is the reason why people in museums can do reconstruction because our ancestors are not so anonymous any more; they have a face you can look into."

Unfortunately the genetic markers Schmidt used could not distinguish which of the ancient humans had blond versus black hair, and she could not determine eye colour.

But, she said she was confident that this will be possible in a few years.

Schmidt said that such research could also be used to help build up identikit pictures to help identify skeletons or criminals.

posted 06 September 2005 06:43 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Charlie_Bass:
Talk about no answers and still using Brace's plot and misrepresenting his views, *YOU* have no answers to this:

---

I've already "answered" that by agreeing with it. Now where are your answers for this:

Well, if you don't like either explanation, then the onus is on you to provide an alternative theory to account for Brace's plot. If Somalis are neither mixed with Eurasians nor descended from Eurasian-like East Africans, then how do you explain their cranial alignment near Eurasian groups?

quote:

---

Originally posted by Babbling Ape:
Don't try and distort.

---

Don't post off-topic. Now quit stalling and get some answers, nig:

Well, if you don't like either explanation, then the onus is on you to provide an alternative theory to account for Brace's plot. If Somalis are neither mixed with Eurasians nor descended from Eurasian-like East Africans, then how do you explain their cranial alignment near Eurasian groups?

quote:

---

pertaining HertoMan of Ethiopia [150kya]

---

"There are implications for the origins of modern races, too. Herto (and Jebel Irhoud) are H. sapiens, but with primitive features. They are not, racially speaking, Africans. The later Omo and Klasies remains are more modern, but they too are archaic, and certainly show no traces of the features that characterise any modern races. Only Qafzeh and Skhul seem to lack these primitive features, and rate as 'generalised modern humans'. Our species seems to have existed as an entity long, long before it began to spread outside Africa or the Middle East, let alone split into geographic races." (Colin Groves)

posted 06 September 2005 11:22 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Calypso:
The evidence against a "caucasian" presence in pre-historic East Africa seems truly overwhelming. Keep on bringing the truth, which, as you pointed out at another time, is the important thing. The spectacle of seeing a Nazi zealot getting a merciless mind whipping, although enjoyable, is but a side-show.

---

posted 06 September 2005 01:54 PM            

quote:

---

Well, if you don't like either explanation, then the onus is on you to provide an alternative theory to account for Brace's plot. If Somalis are neither mixed with Eurasians nor descended from Eurasian-like East Africans, then how do you explain their cranial alignment near Eurasian groups?

---

posted 06 September 2005 01:58 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Charlie_Bass:
Repeating spammer wrote:

Try seeing what Brace wrote you stupid, stubborn trolling moron. I already answered this question with Brace's e-mail reply. Supply a source that says they're Eurasian like, who the hell are you that we should take your biased interpretation of anything?

---

posted 07 September 2005 06:59 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Charlie_Bass:
I already answered this question with Brace's e-mail reply.

---

How is that possible when I asked the question after you posted the e-mail reply?

quote:

---

Supply a source that says they're Eurasian like

---

The source is Brace himself, you blind ape:

So I repeat:

If Somalis are neither mixed with Eurasians nor descended from Eurasian-like East Africans, then how do you explain their cranial alignment near Eurasian groups?

posted 07 September 2005 07:18 AM            

quote:

---

Rejected EuroDummy: So I repeat:

---

Correction....mindless repetition of question Brace has already answered.

quote:

---

EuroDummy: If Somalis are neither mixed with Eurasians

---

Brace has already answered this:
"As I see it, the appearances of the Upper Nile Valley and Horn people has little if anything to do with admixtures"

quote:

---

EuroDummy:
then how do you explain their cranial alignment near Eurasian groups

---

Brace has already answered this:
I would expect people like the Fulani to fall into the same general category as the Somali and Nubians in a kind of Northeast African group. Hiernaux's Elongated East Africans is a fine observation by a first-rate student of the business."

In fact Brace does not 'align' them with Eurasian groups. Brace groups them with other elongated Africans including Nubians.

Brace has answered your questions very clearly, you are simply in denial because he rejected your view. You are behaving exactly as all rejected losers do.

If pretending that Brace has not answered your question is the best you can do, then you are truly a sick puppy.

Seek help!

posted 07 September 2005 01:00 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Evil Euro:
The source is Brace himself, you blind ape:

---

Look I'm posting my final words on this, either you're going to post a direct quote from Brace himself that states they're Eurasian like or shut up. You're making a fool out of yourself misrepresenting his views when he states exactly what he considers them to be. He agreed with the Elongated East African classification by Hiernaux so what the hell are you begging the question for? You're not an anthropologist and you look like a fool arguing against the words of the anthropologist himself and his study. Who are you to overrule him?

posted 07 September 2005 01:43 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Charlie_Bass:
...either you're going to post a **direct** quote from Brace himself that states they're Eurasian like or shut up.

---

posted 08 September 2005 06:48 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Babbling Ape:
Brace has already answered this:
I would expect people like the Fulani to fall into the same general category as the Somali and Nubians in a kind of Northeast African group. Hiernaux's Elongated East Africans is a fine observation by a first-rate student of the business."

---

What he "would expect" is not what actually is. His hypothesis has yet to be tested. The Fulanis I've seen, like Bantu Tutsis, don't resemble E3b-carrying East Africans very much. Still, they're a nomadic Islamic tribe from the southern Sahara, so the possibility of Arab/Berber admixture can't be ruled out.

quote:

---

In fact Brace does not 'align' them with Eurasian groups. Brace groups them with other elongated Africans including Nubians...

---

posted 08 September 2005 07:23 AM            

quote:

---

CL Brace wrote
I would expect people like the Fulani to fall into the same general category as the Somali and Nubians in a kind of Northeast African group. Hiernaux's Elongated East Africans is a fine observation by a first-rate student of the business."

---

quote:

---

Erroneous grovels: His hypothesis has yet to be tested.

---

Wrong. It has been tested by Jean Hiernaux, Philip Rightmire, Keita, Zakrezewski, Brace and others.

quote:

---

Fulanis I've seen, like Bantu Tutsis, don't resemble E3b-carrying East Africans very much.

---

Your non scientific observations are worthless.

Intstead of whining to us because Brace has shattered your racist fantasies, write Brace yourself and dispute his observations - with your Erroneous antics, if you think you can.

In fact, we know you won't because you're afraid he will either reject you, again...or simply ignore you.

quote:

---

rasol wrote: In fact Brace does not 'align' them with Eurasian groups. Brace groups them with other elongated Africans including Nubians...

---

quote:

---

Erroneous writes: who are also intermediate between Sub-Saharan Africans

---

The scholars agree and have debunked your racist-distortions.

So, back to sucking on fellow pseudo Dienekes Pontikos - your only source of "support".

posted 09 September 2005 07:36 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Evil Euro:
Where's the craniometric map with Fulanis plotted on it? Where are the mtDNA and Y-chromosome studies about Fulanis?

---

Brace draws his conclusions based upon his cranial study of Somali and Nubians. which he states is concordant with Hiernaux's skeletal study of Somali and other elongated Africans, and concurs with the data from Dr. Shomarka Keita, Dr. Sonia Zakrezewski et. al..

Fulani DNA has been studied by Cruciani and others.

Not Brace's fault you're both stupid and unaware, of the basic facts necessary to engage in a serious conversation.

So Brace ignores you.

We continue to use you.

Take it....like the loser you are.

Skeletal data from Jean Hiernaux:

Tutsi of Rwanda:

[color=green]

• Stature: 176 cm
  
• Head length: 198 mm
  
• Head breadth: 147 mm
  
• Face height: 125 mm
  
• Face breadth: 134 mm
  
• Nose height: 56 mm
  
• Nose breadth: 39 mm
  
• Relative trunk length: 49.7
  
• Cephalic Index: 74.5
  
• Facial Index: 92.8
  
• Nasal Index: 69.5[/color]

  
  Masai:

  [color=blue]

• Stature: 173 cm
  
• Head length: 194 mm
  
• Head Breadth: 140 mm
  
• Face Height: 121 mm
  
• Face Breadth: 137 mm
  
• Nose Height: 54 mm
  
• Nose Breadth: 39 mm
  
• Relative Trunk length: 47.7
  
• Cephalic Index: 72.8
  
• Facial Index: 89.0
  
• Nasal Index: 72.0[/color]

  
  Galla(Oromo):

  [color=red]

• Stature: 171 cm
  
• Head length: 190 mm
  
• Head Breadth: 147 mm
  
• Face Height: 122 mm
  
• Face Breadth: 133 mm
  
• Nose Height: 53 mm
  
• Nose Breadth: 37 mm
  
• Relative Trunk length: 50.3
  
• Cephalic Index: 77.6
  
• Facial Index: 91.5
  
• Nasal Index: 69.0[/color]

  Sab Somali:

  [color=gray]

• Stature: 173 cm
  
• Head length: 194 mm
  
• Head Breadth: 145 mm
  
• Face Height: 119 mm
  
• Face Breadth: 134 mm
  
• Nose Height: 49 mm
  
• Nose Breadth: 36 mm
  
• Relative Trunk length: 49.7
  
• Cephalic Index: 74.7
  
• Facial Index: 88.5
  
• Nasal Index: 72.8[/color]

  Warsingali Somali:

  [color=navy]

• Stature: 168 cm
  
• Head length: 192 mm
  
• Head Breadth: 143 mm
  
• Face Height: 123 mm
  
• Face Breadth: 131 mm
  
• Nose Height: 52 mm
  
• Nose Breadth: 34 mm
  
• Relative Trunk length: 50.7
  
• Cephalic Index: 74.5
  
• Facial Index: 94.1
  
• Nasal Index: 66.0[/color]
  

posted 09 September 2005 10:12 AM            

quote:

---

Charlie_Bass:
There were no 'Eurasian-like' indigenous East Africans, period

---

Have you ever seen the president of Somalia? He looks like a white Nordic guy with brown skin..

This somali man also looks white/European but with dark skin.

<-- This guy is anything but Negroid

posted 09 September 2005 11:50 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by leba:
Have you ever seen the president of Somalia? He looks like a white Nordic guy with brown skin..

This somali man also looks white/European but with dark skin.

<-- This guy is anything but Negroid

[This message has been edited by leba (edited 09 September 2005).]

---

It is rather interesting to see the variation of features in Africa. Far more variation than in Europe. However, if you have even been to China or paid any attention to the features of Orientals you will see that they too have this type of variation.

posted 10 September 2005 07:00 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Babbling Ape:
Brace draws his conclusions based upon his cranial study of Somali and Nubians. which he states is concordant with Hiernaux's skeletal study of Somali and other elongated Africans, and concurs with the data from Dr. Shomarka Keita, Dr. Sonia Zakrezewski et. al..

Fulani DNA has been studied by Cruciani and others.

Not Brace's fault you're both stupid and unaware, of the basic facts necessary to engage in a serious conversation.

So Brace ignores you.

We continue to use you.

Take it....like the loser you are.

---

Translation: You can't produce any of the requested data. What a surprise.

posted 10 September 2005 01:01 PM            

No surpise at all.

Skeletal data from Jean Hiernaux:

Tutsi of Rwanda:

[color=green]

• Stature: 176 cm
  
• Head length: 198 mm
  
• Head breadth: 147 mm
  
• Face height: 125 mm
  
• Face breadth: 134 mm
  
• Nose height: 56 mm
  
• Nose breadth: 39 mm
  
• Relative trunk length: 49.7
  
• Cephalic Index: 74.5
  
• Facial Index: 92.8
  
• Nasal Index: 69.5[/color]

  
  Masai:

  [color=blue]

• Stature: 173 cm
  
• Head length: 194 mm
  
• Head Breadth: 140 mm
  
• Face Height: 121 mm
  
• Face Breadth: 137 mm
  
• Nose Height: 54 mm
  
• Nose Breadth: 39 mm
  
• Relative Trunk length: 47.7
  
• Cephalic Index: 72.8
  
• Facial Index: 89.0
  
• Nasal Index: 72.0[/color]

  
  Galla(Oromo):

  [color=red]

• Stature: 171 cm
  
• Head length: 190 mm
  
• Head Breadth: 147 mm
  
• Face Height: 122 mm
  
• Face Breadth: 133 mm
  
• Nose Height: 53 mm
  
• Nose Breadth: 37 mm
  
• Relative Trunk length: 50.3
  
• Cephalic Index: 77.6
  
• Facial Index: 91.5
  
• Nasal Index: 69.0[/color]

  Sab Somali:

  [color=gray]

• Stature: 173 cm
  
• Head length: 194 mm
  
• Head Breadth: 145 mm
  
• Face Height: 119 mm
  
• Face Breadth: 134 mm
  
• Nose Height: 49 mm
  
• Nose Breadth: 36 mm
  
• Relative Trunk length: 49.7
  
• Cephalic Index: 74.7
  
• Facial Index: 88.5
  
• Nasal Index: 72.8[/color]

  Warsingali Somali:

  [color=navy]

• Stature: 168 cm
  
• Head length: 192 mm
  
• Head Breadth: 143 mm
  
• Face Height: 123 mm
  
• Face Breadth: 131 mm
  
• Nose Height: 52 mm
  
• Nose Breadth: 34 mm
  
• Relative Trunk length: 50.7
  
• Cephalic Index: 74.5
  
• Facial Index: 94.1
  
• Nasal Index: 66.0[/color]
  

quote:

---

Originally posted by Serpent Wisdom:
Keep trying Erroneous:

Keep trying....

---

posted 10 September 2005 05:55 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Charlie_Bass:
...either you're going to post a **direct** quote from Brace himself that states they're Eurasian like or shut up.

---

posted 10 September 2005 06:27 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Super car:
Back to the business of Brace's merciless rejection of the poor unconscious troll, forcing it to 'temporarily' retract from the futile attribution of indigenous sub-Sahara East African morphology to admixture! Is it any wonder then, that ginney hasn't delivered the requested direct Brace citation on "Eurasian like"?

---

but what's the point??

Stupid-Euro has been beaten and broken so many times, yet the idiot is too stupid to know it, or at least denies it!!

posted 11 September 2005 05:28 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Evil Euro:
[b]Translation: You can't produce any of the requested data. What a surprise.

[/B]

---

Requested data shoved in your face:

Am. J. Hum. Genet., 74:1014-1022, 2004

Fulbe Nigeria: E(xE3b)100%, E-M81: 0%

Fulbe Niger: E(xE3b) 71.4%, E-81: 0%

posted 11 September 2005 06:31 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Babbling Ape:
Skeletal data from Jean Hiernaux:

---

Which doesn't include the Fulani, meaning that you still can't produce any of the requested data. What a surprise.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Charlie_Bass:
Fulbe Nigeria: E(xE3b)100%, E-M81: 0%

Fulbe Niger: E(xE3b) 71.4%, E-81: 0%

---

posted 11 September 2005 10:14 AM            

quote:

---

Requested data shoved in your face:

Am. J. Hum. Genet., 74:1014-1022, 2004

Fulbe Nigeria: E(xE3b)100%, E-M81: 0%

Fulbe Niger: E(xE3b) 71.4%, E-81: 0%

---

CB: Don't let RetardedEuro bait you into supplying him with ever more data. It's just another way of stalling, changing the subject and setting the basis for new monkeyshines from him.

Same with Dienekes by the way. Don't try and prove anything TO THEM. And NEVER accept their distorted terms of argument for the purpose of 'showing them', anything.

Propagandists only goal is to distort information. Sometimes you argue as if you're trying to change THEIR minds.

The objective is merely to prevent them from poluting the public water supply. ie - to shut them down.

You've done a great job of that, and the reply from Brace was very helpful. Thanks.

posted 12 September 2005 06:49 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Babbling Ape:
CB: Don't let RetardedEuro bait you into supplying him with ever more data. It's just another way of stalling, changing the subject

---

Translation: CB: I know you don't have the data we need, and neither to I, so I'll try to stall and change the subject, and maybe Evil Euro won't notice.

quote:

---

The objective is merely to prevent them from poluting the public water supply. ie - to shut them down.

---

Translation: The objective is to prevent the truth from reaching the public -- i.e. to shut down whoever exposes our Afrocentric agendas.

quote:

---

the reply from Brace was very helpful.

---

posted 12 September 2005 08:47 AM            

Or are you taking the same line as Orison and calling as savage.

posted 12 September 2005 09:03 AM            

And...didn't you post an image of the US Soldier attacking the Somali civilian, in order to ridicule a Somali on this forum?

posted 12 September 2005 09:16 AM            

quote:

---

rasol: Didn't you post an image of the US Soldier attacking the Somali civilian, in order to ridicule a REAL Somali on this forum.

---

quote:

---

Cobra writes: NO......MUTALATED BODIES THERE.....

---

translation: Yes......he did.

check yourself, you phony.

posted 12 September 2005 11:05 AM            

Fucking Bantu ape(Rasol) And that Semitic Jew Bastard (Osiron). This is why I hate their kind!

posted 12 September 2005 11:24 AM            

quote:

---

This is why I hate their kind!

---

Your hate, your problem.