EgyptSearch Forums
  Ancient Egypt and Egyptology
  Africa climate history.

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Africa climate history.
rasol
Member

Posts: 3041
Registered: Jun 2004

posted 14 March 2005 08:37 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rasol     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

Africa 22 thousand years ago:

Africa 11 thousand years ago:

Africa 09 thousand years ago:

Africa 05 thousand years ago:

Africa currently


From around 150,000 to 130,000 years ago, Africa experienced colder and more arid than present conditions. About

130,000 years ago, a warm phase moister than the present began, and this lasted until about 115,000 years ago, with

greater rainforest extent and the deserts almost completely covered with vegetation. Subsequent cooling and drying

of the climate led to a cold, arid maximum about 70,000 years ago, followed by a slight moderation of climate and

then a second aridity maximum around 22,000-13,000 14C years ago. Conditions then quickly became warmer and moister,

though with an interruption by aridity around 11,000 14C years ago. A resumption of warm, moist conditions led up to

the Holocene 'optimum' of greater rainforest extent and vegetation covering the Sahara. Conditions then became

somewhat more arid and similar to the present. Relatively brief arid phases (e.g. 8,200 14C y.a.) appear to

punctuate the generally moister early and mid Holocene conditions.

IP: Logged

rasol
Member

Posts: 3041
Registered: Jun 2004

posted 14 March 2005 09:06 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rasol     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
source: http://www.esd.ornl.gov/projects/qen/nercAFRICA.html

IP: Logged

rasol
Member

Posts: 3041
Registered: Jun 2004

posted 14 March 2005 10:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rasol     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The primary habitat for homo sapiens throughout African history has been the savanna grasslands. (yellow and purple)

Observe that grassland stretches from west coast to east coast, always has. The latitude and extent of it expands and contracts as the climate cycles over and again thru wet and dry phases, but east and west Africa have never been substantially cut off from one another.

[This message has been edited by rasol (edited 14 March 2005).]

IP: Logged

Super car
Member

Posts: 930
Registered: Jan 2005

posted 14 March 2005 11:33 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Super car     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Earlier it was thought that Homo Sapiens Sapiens appeared around 150, 000 years ago. Further studies show that they may well have been around 200,000 years ago. In light of what you posted earlier (provided below), what should be said about the climatic conditions during 200,000 years and how this affects the evolutionary process of humans? One would think that the climatic conditions influencing the evolutionary process would start little over the timeframe set for anatomically modern humans, wouldn't say? East Africa is notorious for its mountainous regions.

quote:
From around 150,000 to 130,000 years ago, Africa experienced colder and more arid than present conditions.

[This message has been edited by Super car (edited 15 March 2005).]

IP: Logged

rasol
Member

Posts: 3041
Registered: Jun 2004

posted 15 March 2005 06:35 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for rasol     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Super car:
Earlier it was thought that Homo Sapiens Sapiens appeared around 150, 000 years ago. Further studies show that they may well have been around 200,000 years ago. In light of what you posted earlier (provided below), what should be said about the climatic conditions during 200,000 years and how this affects the evolutionary process of humans?

What should be said is that climate varies everywhere and the variations involve many complex interrelated cycles, which are in turn related to ocean currents, orbital axes variation, release of carbon dioxide from volcanos and many other phenomena.

However, tropical regions such as Africa do not vary as wildly over time as do northerly climes such as North America or Europe.

Europe and North America vacilate between being largely ice covered wastelands to milder more temperate zones.

Africa varies largey in that the deserts, grasslands and rainforests spread, and retreat, with human populations expanding and retreating along with it. During the last wet phase about 10,000 years ago much of the sahara was fertile, with crocodiles, giraffes, lakes and substantial human populations as well.

The drying of this area is likely one of the factors that caused populations to converge into the Nile Valley and also expand across the Levant. Populations in Africa respond to climate change primarily by migrating.

The precursors of the indigenous somatic variations that exist in Africa today have existed for many 10's of thousands of years because the same range of climate variation has exited during this time, and repeated over and again. And of course this is notwithstanding the climatic constant of tropical solar radiation, to which native African dark skin tone is adapted.

The situation in Europe could not be more different....

About 24,000 years ago, the last ice age began, with mountain-sized glaciers moving across most of Europe. Paleolithic Europeans retreated before the ice, finding refuge for hundreds of generations in three areas: what is now Spain, the Balkans and the Ukraine. - PA Underhill.

[This message has been edited by rasol (edited 15 March 2005).]

IP: Logged

rasol
Member

Posts: 3041
Registered: Jun 2004

posted 15 March 2005 09:55 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for rasol     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Solar Activity and Ice Ages, causes and relevance to African morphology.

There are 3 principal factors directly effecting the amount of energy the earth gets from the sun. The solar cycle, orbital eccentricity and, perhaps the most important... orbital tilt.


The greater the tilt in the Earth's axis.....the MORE solar energy is received in the mid and high latitudes....and less (than usual) is received in the tropical and equatoral regions.

The smaller the tilt in the Earth's axis...the more solar energy is received in TROPICS, and less in the mid and high latitudes.

It is this condition that is one of many interrelated culprits in triggering ICE AGES.

25 thousand years ago the Earth's axis tilt was near it's minimum. This means Northern EurAsia may have recieved less UV at this time, but tropical East Africa may have actualy recieved more.

Pale skin tones developed in Eurasia at around this time. In tropical Africa, pale skin is and always has been maladaptive (ie = skin cancer).

Native tropical Africans have dark skin for this reason and always have- throughout the entire history of modern human evolution from 150kbp until today.

IP: Logged

Super car
Member

Posts: 930
Registered: Jan 2005

posted 16 March 2005 12:36 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Super car     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Good replies.

IP: Logged

rasol
Member

Posts: 3041
Registered: Jun 2004

posted 16 March 2005 05:41 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for rasol     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The Earth's orbit is elliptical and also changes from a more oval shape to a more circular one over time.

Apehelion - when the earth is furthest from the sun.

Perhelion - when the earth is closest to the sun.

Presently the perhelion occurs in January and apehelion in July. To those living in the Northern Hemisphere this may seem odd, but this actually makes the seasonal extremes in the Northern Hemisphere less severe and those in the Southern Hemisphere more severe.

10 thousand years ago, the reverse was the case, 20 thousand years ago, it was as it is now.


Each of these phenomena have a different time scale and so a complex relationship on the earth's climate, often effecting the northern vs. southern hemishere and the topics vs. the high latitudes, in opposite ways, and with a minimal effect on actual UV sometimes having a major impact on climate especially in Northern Eurasia.

Africa's native peoples are primarily adapted to a high UV environment with differing ranges of savanna grassland, desert and rainforest.

[This message has been edited by rasol (edited 16 March 2005).]

IP: Logged

rasol
Member

Posts: 3041
Registered: Jun 2004

posted 19 March 2005 08:33 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rasol     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
9000 years ago grassland extended north in Africa all the way up thru Nubia to what is now southern Egypt.


What is now the sahel zone, the present climatic abode of peoples such as the Taureg and Fulani, made up almost the entirety of the Northernmost regions of the continent, and true Sahara, essentially ceased to exist, and sub-sahara during this formative period for African culture is somewhat of a misnomer.


Stop around lunchtime at Dabos to see the stunning, almost life size, recently discovered neolithic rock engraving of a giraffe. Rock engravings and paintings in this part of the Sahara date as early as 8-6,000BC. The giraffe at Dabos is another testimony that the Sahara was once wet and green http://www.exploreafrica.net

[This message has been edited by rasol (edited 20 March 2005).]

IP: Logged

Super car
Member

Posts: 930
Registered: Jan 2005

posted 19 March 2005 08:46 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Super car     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Sub-Sahara, though really a geographical term, has become politicized to mean something other than that. Again, mainly the development of 19th century European approach to scholarship. In fact, Egypts history, not to mention the linguistic ties of North African territories, belies intentions behind the politicized use of the term. In bio-anthropology and linguistics, so long as it is used in its proper geographical context and in a consistent manner, there should be no problem.

IP: Logged

kifaru
Member

Posts: 82
Registered: Jul 2004

posted 20 March 2005 03:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for kifaru     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by rasol:

Observe that grassland stretches from west coast to east coast, always has. The latitude and extent of it expands and contracts as the climate cycles over and again thru wet and dry phases, but east and west Africa have never been substantially cut off from one another.

[This message has been edited by rasol (edited 14 March 2005).]


Thank you for making this point. I am always somewhat amazed by the fact that people believe that africans cannot now or could not then travel long distances or traverse hostile terrain of their own volition.

IP: Logged

rasol
Member

Posts: 3041
Registered: Jun 2004

posted 20 March 2005 04:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rasol     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by kifaru:
Thank you for making this point. I am always somewhat amazed by the fact that people believe that africans cannot now or could not then travel long distances or traverse hostile terrain of their own volition.

It is also interesting to consider, in terms of defining Africa by geography and then by ethnicity....where exacty does East Africa end and west Africa begin, and why...based on what geographic feature, cultural facet, genotype or physical feature?

In truth you are likely to find affinity on all fronts from East to West for reasons shown on the above climate maps.

However since anthropology revealed the rift valley origins of humanity, the tendency has been to attempt to remove East Africa...from Africa.

And many misguided studies on Africa and its peoples have, by design, and consciously or not, tended to conceptually replicate that ideological bias.

IP: Logged

rasol
Member

Posts: 3041
Registered: Jun 2004

posted 26 March 2005 05:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rasol     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by rasol:
AFRICA:

The Fertile Valleys of the Nile, Indus, Tigris, Euphrates, and Yellow rivers were able to support large populations and it was here that great 'civilisations' of the Ancient world emerged

more...


Thought Posts:


http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/~e118/publications/Brooks-BeyondCollapse-abs.pdf

IP: Logged

Thought2
Member

Posts: 1491
Registered: May 2004

posted 26 March 2005 08:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Thought2     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by rasol:
Thought Posts:


http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/~e118/publications/Brooks-BeyondCollapse-abs.pdf


Thought Writes:

The important thing about this study is that it demonstrates the flaws in the "agricultural revolution" theory as espoused by Gordan Childe. Childe argued that agriculture and animal husbandry led to sedentism and sedentism led to an urban revolution. This urban revolution in turn led to social complexity or "civilization". Of course we now know that some groups like Africans in Early Khartoum have been sedentary since the early Holocene but did not develop hierarchical complex political structures. Likewise central and northern Europeans practiced village based agriculture earlier than Africans outside the Nile Valley, yet they NEVER developed hierarchical complex political structures they simply received these structures from Rome. Populations in the Saharan Neolithic practiced a semi-sedentary wild grain using transhumance based lifestyle, yet they also developed hierarchical complex political structures as evidenced by the burial of elites throughout the Sahara. This political substructure was infused and elaborated on in Ancient Egypt. The key seems to be economies based upon agriculture and/or animal husbandry effected by extreme environmental constraints. Agriculture and/or animal husbandry produce unequal wealth accumulation. Environmental stress adds hierarchical complexity to this economic and political structure.

IP: Logged

windstorm2005
Member

Posts: 32
Registered: Feb 2005

posted 27 March 2005 09:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for windstorm2005     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Excellent thread!

...What about what Europe was like during corresponding periods?

IP: Logged

Super car
Member

Posts: 930
Registered: Jan 2005

posted 27 March 2005 09:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Super car     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Thought2:
Thought Writes:

Of course we now know that some groups like Africans in Early Khartoum have been sedentary since the early Holocene but did not develop hierarchical complex political structures.

??

[This message has been edited by Super car (edited 27 March 2005).]

IP: Logged

rasol
Member

Posts: 3041
Registered: Jun 2004

posted 29 March 2005 06:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for rasol     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
About 80 percent of Europeans arose from primitive hunters who arrived about 40,000 years ago, endured the long ice age and then expanded rapidly to dominate the continent, a new study shows.

About 24,000 years ago, the last ice age began, with mountain-sized glaciers moving across most of Europe. Underhill said the Paleolithic Europeans retreated before the ice, finding refuge for hundreds of generations in three areas: what is now Spain, the Balkans and the Ukraine.

When the glaciers melted, about 16,000 years ago, the Paleolithic tribes resettled the rest of Europe. Y chromosome mutations occurred among people in each of the ice age refuges, said Underhill. He said the research shows a pattern that developed in Spain is now most common in northwest Europe, while the Ukraine pattern is mostly in Eastern Europe and the Balkan pattern is most common in Central Europe.

About 8,000 years ago, said Underhill, a more advanced people, the Neolithic, migrated to Europe from the Middle East, bringing with them a new Y chromosome pattern* and a new way of life: agriculture. About 20 percent of Europeans now have the Y chromosome pattern from this migration, he said.

In general, studies show that modern humans first arose in Africa about 100,000 years ago and thousands of years later began a long series of migrations, he said. Some groups migrated eastward and humans are known to have existed in Australia about 60,000 years ago. Other groups crossed the land bridge into the Middle East. Humans appeared in Central Asia about 50,000 years ago. From there, the theory goes, some migrated west, arriving in Europe about 40,000 years ago
- Early Europeans, 11-2000 AP

IP: Logged

Thought2
Member

Posts: 1491
Registered: May 2004

posted 29 March 2005 11:16 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Thought2     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by windstorm2005:
Excellent thread!

...What about what Europe was like during corresponding periods?


Thought Writes:

Simple hunters and gathers until the spread of the neolithic from Africa via the Near East.

IP: Logged

rasol
Member

Posts: 3041
Registered: Jun 2004

posted 05 April 2005 07:37 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rasol     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
First Farmers
Peter Bellwood
2004

"Paleolithic Egyptians, such as those who used Wadi Kubanniya campsites about 20,000 years ago, exploited fish, migrant birds, wild cattle, gazelle, and hartebeest, and used grindstones to prepare a toxic tuber (Cypres rotundus) for leaching prior to consumption."

Thought Writes:

Another interesting fact from Bellwoods book is that he charts the southern boundary of the sahara around Dakhleh and the northern limit of the Tsetse Fly zone around Kadero. Hence the bulk of Africas population during the Neolithic period (8,000 to 3,000 B.C.) would be packed between these two latitudes from the Atlantic to the Red Sea.


IP: Logged

rasol
Member

Posts: 3041
Registered: Jun 2004

posted 27 April 2005 10:57 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for rasol     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ausar:
In the Paleolithic period [before 5000 B.C.] the Delta and Nile Valley were virtually uninhabitable. The annual flood [inundation] of the river Nile would have placed all areas of the Nile Valley under water for three months of each year, and at other times it was covered with thick vegetation that provided habitation for a variety of wild animals. In the north much of the low lying Delta was converted with papyrus swamps. At this time people lived on the desert spurs and hunted prolific game. As the climate became drier and the vegitation of the Nile Valley gradually changed , they were able to move down into the valley once the inudation receded . Here during the Neolithic period[c. 5000-4000 B.C.] they began to cultivate the land ,gorwing grain and learning to domesticate animals.


Atlas of Ancient Egypt (Cultural Atlas of) - John Baines; Hardcover

page 59


ISBN: 0871963345

Publisher: Facts on File (July 1, 1980)


IP: Logged

rasol
Member

Posts: 3041
Registered: Jun 2004

posted 04 May 2005 12:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rasol     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The Holocene Climate Optimum warm event consisted of increases of up to 4 °C near the North Pole (in one study, winter warming of 3-9°C and summer of 2-6°C in northern central Siberia.

Northwestern Europe experienced warming, while there was cooling in the south.

The average temperature change appears to have declined rapidly with latitude so that essentially no change in mean temperature is reported at low and mid latitudes.

Tropical reefs tend to show temperature increases of less than 1 °C. In terms of the global average, the typical shift was probably between 0.5 and 2 °C warmer than the mid-20th century (depending on estimates of latitude dependence and seasonality in response patterns).


In the far southern hemisphere (e.g. New Zealand and Antarctica), the warmest period during the Holocene appears to have been roughly 8,000 to 10,500 years ago, immediately following the end of last ice age

By 6,000 years ago, the time normally associated with the Holocene Climatic Optimum in the Northern Hemisphere, these regions had reached temperatures similar to those existing in the modern era, and did not participate in the temperature changes of the North.

However, some authors have used the term "Holocene Climatic Optimum" to describe this earlier southern warm period as well.

While there do not appear to have been significant temperature changes at most low latitude sites, other climate changes have been reported.

Since there is no scientific consensus on how to reconstruct global temperature variations during the Holocene
, the average shown here should be understood as only a rough, quasi-global approximation to the the temperature history of the Holocene
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature_record


IP: Logged

rasol
Member

Posts: 3041
Registered: Jun 2004

posted 08 May 2005 05:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rasol     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Thought:

The Horn of Africa During the Last Glacial Maximum:

"Conditions over other parts of Ethiopea are a matter of conjecture. With the evidence of drying in the highlands and the rift valley region, we suggest that **TROPICAL** desert covered much of the Horn of Africa."



http://www.esd.ornl.gov/projects/qen/new_africa.html

[This message has been edited by rasol (edited 08 May 2005).]

IP: Logged

rasol
Member

Posts: 3041
Registered: Jun 2004

posted 08 May 2005 06:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rasol     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

Cave painting from Northern Algeria - 6000 BC

[This message has been edited by rasol (edited 08 May 2005).]

IP: Logged

All times are GMT (+2)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | EgyptSearch!

(c) 2003 EgyptSearch.com

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c